Ian Davison, Ralph A. Saporito, Lisa M. Schulte, Kyle Summers
{"title":"来自火蚁的胡椒碱生物碱不会被绿黑毒蛙(树蛙)所吸收。","authors":"Ian Davison, Ralph A. Saporito, Lisa M. Schulte, Kyle Summers","doi":"10.1007/s00049-021-00357-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Neotropical poison frogs possess alkaloid-based antipredator defenses which they sequester from a diet of arthropods such as oribatid mites and myrmicine ants. Alkaloid sequestration is still poorly understood and although several studies have examined its uptake, most experiments directly feed alkaloids to the frogs. Here, we examined the alkaloid uptake system in the poison frog species <i>Dendrobates auratus</i> by feeding it an alkaloid-containing prey item, the red imported fire ant <i>Solenopsis invicta</i> (Formicidae, Myrmicinae). Captive bred frogs were either fed live ants or fruit flies dusted with powdered ants for 4 months. Using GC–MS, we confirm that <i>S. invicta</i> contain previously described piperidine alkaloids known as solenopsins; however, none of these piperidine alkaloids was detected in the skin of <i>D. auratus</i>, suggesting the frogs are incapable of sequestering solenopsins from <i>S. invicta</i>. It is possible that <i>D. auratus</i> are unable to sequester fire ant piperidines due to their long hydrocarbon side chains, a feature that makes them structurally different than most known alkaloids in poison frogs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":515,"journal":{"name":"Chemoecology","volume":"31 6","pages":"391 - 396"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00049-021-00357-1","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Piperidine alkaloids from fire ants are not sequestered by the green and black poison frog (Dendrobates auratus)\",\"authors\":\"Ian Davison, Ralph A. Saporito, Lisa M. Schulte, Kyle Summers\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00049-021-00357-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Neotropical poison frogs possess alkaloid-based antipredator defenses which they sequester from a diet of arthropods such as oribatid mites and myrmicine ants. Alkaloid sequestration is still poorly understood and although several studies have examined its uptake, most experiments directly feed alkaloids to the frogs. Here, we examined the alkaloid uptake system in the poison frog species <i>Dendrobates auratus</i> by feeding it an alkaloid-containing prey item, the red imported fire ant <i>Solenopsis invicta</i> (Formicidae, Myrmicinae). Captive bred frogs were either fed live ants or fruit flies dusted with powdered ants for 4 months. Using GC–MS, we confirm that <i>S. invicta</i> contain previously described piperidine alkaloids known as solenopsins; however, none of these piperidine alkaloids was detected in the skin of <i>D. auratus</i>, suggesting the frogs are incapable of sequestering solenopsins from <i>S. invicta</i>. It is possible that <i>D. auratus</i> are unable to sequester fire ant piperidines due to their long hydrocarbon side chains, a feature that makes them structurally different than most known alkaloids in poison frogs.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":515,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chemoecology\",\"volume\":\"31 6\",\"pages\":\"391 - 396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s00049-021-00357-1\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chemoecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00049-021-00357-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chemoecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00049-021-00357-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Piperidine alkaloids from fire ants are not sequestered by the green and black poison frog (Dendrobates auratus)
Neotropical poison frogs possess alkaloid-based antipredator defenses which they sequester from a diet of arthropods such as oribatid mites and myrmicine ants. Alkaloid sequestration is still poorly understood and although several studies have examined its uptake, most experiments directly feed alkaloids to the frogs. Here, we examined the alkaloid uptake system in the poison frog species Dendrobates auratus by feeding it an alkaloid-containing prey item, the red imported fire ant Solenopsis invicta (Formicidae, Myrmicinae). Captive bred frogs were either fed live ants or fruit flies dusted with powdered ants for 4 months. Using GC–MS, we confirm that S. invicta contain previously described piperidine alkaloids known as solenopsins; however, none of these piperidine alkaloids was detected in the skin of D. auratus, suggesting the frogs are incapable of sequestering solenopsins from S. invicta. It is possible that D. auratus are unable to sequester fire ant piperidines due to their long hydrocarbon side chains, a feature that makes them structurally different than most known alkaloids in poison frogs.
期刊介绍:
It is the aim of Chemoecology to promote and stimulate basic science in the field of chemical ecology by publishing research papers that integrate evolution and/or ecology and chemistry in an attempt to increase our understanding of the biological significance of natural products. Its scopes cover the evolutionary biology, mechanisms and chemistry of biotic interactions and the evolution and synthesis of the underlying natural products. Manuscripts on the evolution and ecology of trophic relationships, intra- and interspecific communication, competition, and other kinds of chemical communication in all types of organismic interactions will be considered suitable for publication. Ecological studies of trophic interactions will be considered also if they are based on the information of the transmission of natural products (e.g. fatty acids) through the food-chain. Chemoecology further publishes papers that relate to the evolution and ecology of interactions mediated by non-volatile compounds (e.g. adhesive secretions). Mechanistic approaches may include the identification, biosynthesis and metabolism of substances that carry information and the elucidation of receptor- and transduction systems using physiological, biochemical and molecular techniques. Papers describing the structure and functional morphology of organs involved in chemical communication will also be considered.