有机和无机投入下的土壤养分状况与水稻产量

Q3 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology Pub Date : 2021-11-10 DOI:10.7324/jabb.2021.96023
Michael Troza, Anamae Sutacio, Al Polinar, R. Rollon
{"title":"有机和无机投入下的土壤养分状况与水稻产量","authors":"Michael Troza, Anamae Sutacio, Al Polinar, R. Rollon","doi":"10.7324/jabb.2021.96023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A field experiment was conducted to determine the effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer applications on soil fertility, productivity, and rice profitability. There were five treatment combinations with four replications laid out in Randomized complete block design (RCBD). The treatments were as follows: T1: control, T2: farmer’s practice (FP), T3: recommended rate (RR), T4: organic fertilizer (OF), and T5: RR50% + OF50%. RR50% + OF50% application significantly increased soil fertility after harvest. The N and K uptake of rice was also increased under FP and RR treatments. All yield components were increased with FP, RR, and RR50% + OF50% treatments, with the consistently highest increase in the FP treatment. The highest grain yield obtained was in FP (6.68 t ha−1) followed by RR (6.28 t ha−1), RR50% + OF50% (6.12 t ha −1), and OF (5.25 t ha−1), while the lowest yield was recorded in the control treatment (4.67 t ha−1). The net income was also increased by 43% in FP, 39% in RR, and 34% in RR50% + OF50% over the control. Maximum rice productivity and profitability were both obtained under FP. However, a similar yield and profit increase were also obtained in RR and RR50% + OF50% treatments. The results highlighted the importance of combining organic and chemical fertilizers to reduce the cost of fertilizer inputs, increase soil fertility, improve rice yield, and maximize profitability in rice production.","PeriodicalId":15032,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology","volume":"10 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil nutrient status and yield of rice under organic and inorganic inputs\",\"authors\":\"Michael Troza, Anamae Sutacio, Al Polinar, R. Rollon\",\"doi\":\"10.7324/jabb.2021.96023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A field experiment was conducted to determine the effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer applications on soil fertility, productivity, and rice profitability. There were five treatment combinations with four replications laid out in Randomized complete block design (RCBD). The treatments were as follows: T1: control, T2: farmer’s practice (FP), T3: recommended rate (RR), T4: organic fertilizer (OF), and T5: RR50% + OF50%. RR50% + OF50% application significantly increased soil fertility after harvest. The N and K uptake of rice was also increased under FP and RR treatments. All yield components were increased with FP, RR, and RR50% + OF50% treatments, with the consistently highest increase in the FP treatment. The highest grain yield obtained was in FP (6.68 t ha−1) followed by RR (6.28 t ha−1), RR50% + OF50% (6.12 t ha −1), and OF (5.25 t ha−1), while the lowest yield was recorded in the control treatment (4.67 t ha−1). The net income was also increased by 43% in FP, 39% in RR, and 34% in RR50% + OF50% over the control. Maximum rice productivity and profitability were both obtained under FP. However, a similar yield and profit increase were also obtained in RR and RR50% + OF50% treatments. The results highlighted the importance of combining organic and chemical fertilizers to reduce the cost of fertilizer inputs, increase soil fertility, improve rice yield, and maximize profitability in rice production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology\",\"volume\":\"10 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7324/jabb.2021.96023\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7324/jabb.2021.96023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

进行了一项田间试验,以确定施用有机和无机肥料对土壤肥力、生产力和水稻盈利能力的影响。采用随机完全块设计(RCBD),共有五种治疗组合,四次重复。处理如下:T1:对照,T2:农民实践(FP),T3:推荐率(RR),T4:有机肥(OF),T5:RR50%+OF50%。RR50%+OF50%施用显著提高了收获后的土壤肥力。FP和RR处理也提高了水稻对N和K的吸收。FP、RR和RR50%+OF50%处理增加了所有产量成分,其中FP处理的产量始终最高。获得的粮食产量最高的是FP(6.68 t ha−1),其次是RR(6.28 t ha–1)、RR50%+OF50%(6.12 t ha−2)和OF(5.25 t ha−3),而对照处理的产量最低(4.67 t ha−4)。FP的净收入也比对照增加了43%,RR增加了39%,RR50%+OF50%增加了34%。在FP处理下,水稻产量和盈利能力都达到了最高水平。然而,RR和RR50%+OF50%处理也获得了类似的产量和利润增长。研究结果强调了有机肥料和化肥相结合的重要性,以降低化肥投入成本,提高土壤肥力,提高水稻产量,并最大限度地提高水稻生产的盈利能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Soil nutrient status and yield of rice under organic and inorganic inputs
A field experiment was conducted to determine the effects of organic and inorganic fertilizer applications on soil fertility, productivity, and rice profitability. There were five treatment combinations with four replications laid out in Randomized complete block design (RCBD). The treatments were as follows: T1: control, T2: farmer’s practice (FP), T3: recommended rate (RR), T4: organic fertilizer (OF), and T5: RR50% + OF50%. RR50% + OF50% application significantly increased soil fertility after harvest. The N and K uptake of rice was also increased under FP and RR treatments. All yield components were increased with FP, RR, and RR50% + OF50% treatments, with the consistently highest increase in the FP treatment. The highest grain yield obtained was in FP (6.68 t ha−1) followed by RR (6.28 t ha−1), RR50% + OF50% (6.12 t ha −1), and OF (5.25 t ha−1), while the lowest yield was recorded in the control treatment (4.67 t ha−1). The net income was also increased by 43% in FP, 39% in RR, and 34% in RR50% + OF50% over the control. Maximum rice productivity and profitability were both obtained under FP. However, a similar yield and profit increase were also obtained in RR and RR50% + OF50% treatments. The results highlighted the importance of combining organic and chemical fertilizers to reduce the cost of fertilizer inputs, increase soil fertility, improve rice yield, and maximize profitability in rice production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology
Journal of Applied Biology and Biotechnology Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Food Science
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
181
期刊最新文献
Characterization and comparative assessment of bactericidal activity of carbon nanodots (CDs) and nanoparticles (CNPs) prepared from soot's of clarified butter and mustard oil, respectively Screening and isolation of potential nitrogen-fixing Enterobacter sp. GG1 from mangrove soil with its accelerated impact on green chili plant (Capsicum frutescens L.) growth amelioration Synthesis of bio-nanofiber from pectin/polyvinyl alcohol for therapeutic application Letter regarding “Elastase and COVID-19 relationship, and potential natural resource as elastase inhibitors: A comprehensive review” Bacillus paralicheniformis (OQ202112) - Mediated biodiesel production using groundnut husk: A sustainable approach for bioenergy generation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1