并不是所有的英语结果结构都是一样的:西班牙语使用者对结果结构的习得

IF 1.3 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Acquisition Pub Date : 2022-12-16 DOI:10.1080/10489223.2022.2141634
Luis París, Maria Alejandra Celi, Á. Tabullo, M. Godoy
{"title":"并不是所有的英语结果结构都是一样的:西班牙语使用者对结果结构的习得","authors":"Luis París, Maria Alejandra Celi, Á. Tabullo, M. Godoy","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2022.2141634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The English Resultative Construction (ERC) is a satellite-framed structure with no identical equivalent in Spanish. In a series of studies, we analyzed and compared recognition (acceptability judgment task) and comprehension (sentence comprehension task) of three ERC subtypes with the English Depictive Construction (EDC) (which has a Spanish counterpart) by Spanish speaker learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Results showed that: 1) EDCs were better recognized than ERCs by L2 learners, but highly proficient participants were closer to English native speakers’ performance, 2) Less proficient EFLs comprehended EDCs better than those ERC subtypes that were further from Spanish (ERC Property and Fake Reflexive). We interpret our findings in terms of an interlinguistic distance gradient, where those constructions present (EDC) or closer (ERC-Path) to L1 are more readily acquired. This effect seems more prominent at lower EFL proficiencies, and fades as proficiency increases, evolving towards a more native-like pattern.","PeriodicalId":46920,"journal":{"name":"Language Acquisition","volume":"144 2","pages":"105 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Not all English Resultative Constructions (ERCs) are equal: The acquisition of ERC by Spanish speakers\",\"authors\":\"Luis París, Maria Alejandra Celi, Á. Tabullo, M. Godoy\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10489223.2022.2141634\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The English Resultative Construction (ERC) is a satellite-framed structure with no identical equivalent in Spanish. In a series of studies, we analyzed and compared recognition (acceptability judgment task) and comprehension (sentence comprehension task) of three ERC subtypes with the English Depictive Construction (EDC) (which has a Spanish counterpart) by Spanish speaker learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Results showed that: 1) EDCs were better recognized than ERCs by L2 learners, but highly proficient participants were closer to English native speakers’ performance, 2) Less proficient EFLs comprehended EDCs better than those ERC subtypes that were further from Spanish (ERC Property and Fake Reflexive). We interpret our findings in terms of an interlinguistic distance gradient, where those constructions present (EDC) or closer (ERC-Path) to L1 are more readily acquired. This effect seems more prominent at lower EFL proficiencies, and fades as proficiency increases, evolving towards a more native-like pattern.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Acquisition\",\"volume\":\"144 2\",\"pages\":\"105 - 138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Acquisition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2022.2141634\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2022.2141634","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:英国成果结构(ERC)是一种卫星框架结构,在西班牙语中没有完全相同的结构。在一系列研究中,我们分析并比较了以西班牙语为母语的外语学习者对英语描述结构(EDC)的三种ERC亚型的识别(可接受性判断任务)和理解(句子理解任务)。研究结果表明:1)二语学习者对EDC的识别优于对ERC的识别,但高度熟练的参与者更接近英语母语者的表现;2)不太熟练的EFL比那些远离西班牙语的ERC亚型(ERC属性和假反射)更能理解EDC。我们根据语际距离梯度来解释我们的发现,其中那些存在于L1(EDC)或更接近L1(ERC-Path)的结构更容易获得。这种影响在英语水平较低的情况下似乎更为突出,并随着英语水平的提高而消退,朝着更像母语的模式发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Not all English Resultative Constructions (ERCs) are equal: The acquisition of ERC by Spanish speakers
ABSTRACT The English Resultative Construction (ERC) is a satellite-framed structure with no identical equivalent in Spanish. In a series of studies, we analyzed and compared recognition (acceptability judgment task) and comprehension (sentence comprehension task) of three ERC subtypes with the English Depictive Construction (EDC) (which has a Spanish counterpart) by Spanish speaker learners of English as a Foreign Language (EFL). Results showed that: 1) EDCs were better recognized than ERCs by L2 learners, but highly proficient participants were closer to English native speakers’ performance, 2) Less proficient EFLs comprehended EDCs better than those ERC subtypes that were further from Spanish (ERC Property and Fake Reflexive). We interpret our findings in terms of an interlinguistic distance gradient, where those constructions present (EDC) or closer (ERC-Path) to L1 are more readily acquired. This effect seems more prominent at lower EFL proficiencies, and fades as proficiency increases, evolving towards a more native-like pattern.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The research published in Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics makes a clear contribution to linguistic theory by increasing our understanding of how language is acquired. The journal focuses on the acquisition of syntax, semantics, phonology, and morphology, and considers theoretical, experimental, and computational perspectives. Coverage includes solutions to the logical problem of language acquisition, as it arises for particular grammatical proposals; discussion of acquisition data relevant to current linguistic questions; and perspectives derived from theory-driven studies of second language acquisition, language-impaired speakers, and other domains of cognition.
期刊最新文献
Wh-word acquisition in Czech: Exploring the growing trees hypothesis Why second-language speakers sometimes, but not always, derive scalar inferences like first-language speakers: Effects of task demands Subject position in Greek and Spanish monolingual and bilingual production: Exploring the influence of verb type and definiteness Mandarin non-interrogative wh-words distinguished between children with Developmental Language Disorder and Language-Impaired autistic children Children’s early negative auxiliaries are true auxiliaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1