静态和动态板载试验确定变形模量的实验研究

IF 0.6 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering Pub Date : 2020-09-28 DOI:10.7250/BJRBE.2020-15.497
S. Lehmann, S. Leppla, A. Norkus
{"title":"静态和动态板载试验确定变形模量的实验研究","authors":"S. Lehmann, S. Leppla, A. Norkus","doi":"10.7250/BJRBE.2020-15.497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Soil, or soil structure modulus of deformation, is one of the main design parameters for road engineering and traffic infrastructure design of, for example, highways, railways, runways and embankments. It is also the main soil improvement criterion. When creating any road structure with codified design resistance, one employs structural layers of certain thicknesses and modulus of deformation. Both values need to satisfy the minimum values in accordance with codified requirements. This paper analyzes correlations for the widely applied in engineering practice methods to determine the soil stiffness. The static test methods acknowledged to be exact enough for determining the modulus of deformation for the primary and secondary loadings. As dynamic test methods require significantly less time and financial resources, they are widely accepted in engineering practice. The dynamic methods determine only the dynamic modulus of deformation. Design practice aims to relate it with the static modulus of deformation of the secondary loading. Many countries propose codified correlations, with differing levels of conservatism, to convert the dynamic modulus of deformation into the static one. Developed correlations between the results of the static plate load test and the dynamic plate load tests processed from own test results of different soils are presented and a comparative analysis with other proposed correlations is given.","PeriodicalId":55402,"journal":{"name":"Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Study of the Modulus of Deformation Determined by Static and Dynamic Plate Load Tests\",\"authors\":\"S. Lehmann, S. Leppla, A. Norkus\",\"doi\":\"10.7250/BJRBE.2020-15.497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Soil, or soil structure modulus of deformation, is one of the main design parameters for road engineering and traffic infrastructure design of, for example, highways, railways, runways and embankments. It is also the main soil improvement criterion. When creating any road structure with codified design resistance, one employs structural layers of certain thicknesses and modulus of deformation. Both values need to satisfy the minimum values in accordance with codified requirements. This paper analyzes correlations for the widely applied in engineering practice methods to determine the soil stiffness. The static test methods acknowledged to be exact enough for determining the modulus of deformation for the primary and secondary loadings. As dynamic test methods require significantly less time and financial resources, they are widely accepted in engineering practice. The dynamic methods determine only the dynamic modulus of deformation. Design practice aims to relate it with the static modulus of deformation of the secondary loading. Many countries propose codified correlations, with differing levels of conservatism, to convert the dynamic modulus of deformation into the static one. Developed correlations between the results of the static plate load test and the dynamic plate load tests processed from own test results of different soils are presented and a comparative analysis with other proposed correlations is given.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7250/BJRBE.2020-15.497\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7250/BJRBE.2020-15.497","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

土或土结构变形模量是公路、铁路、跑道和路堤等道路工程和交通基础设施设计的主要设计参数之一。它也是土壤改良的主要标准。当创建具有规范设计阻力的任何道路结构时,人们使用一定厚度和变形模量的结构层。两个值都需要满足符合法规要求的最小值。本文分析了在工程实践中广泛应用的确定土刚度的相关方法。公认的静态试验方法对于确定主要和次要载荷的变形模量是足够精确的。由于动态测试方法需要较少的时间和财力,因此在工程实践中被广泛接受。动力方法只确定变形的动力模量。设计实践旨在将其与二次荷载的静变形模量联系起来。许多国家提出以不同程度的保守性编纂相关性,将动态变形模量转换为静态变形模量。本文介绍了静板荷载试验结果与根据不同土的试验结果进行的动板荷载试验结果之间发展的相关性,并与其他提出的相关性进行了比较分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Experimental Study of the Modulus of Deformation Determined by Static and Dynamic Plate Load Tests
Soil, or soil structure modulus of deformation, is one of the main design parameters for road engineering and traffic infrastructure design of, for example, highways, railways, runways and embankments. It is also the main soil improvement criterion. When creating any road structure with codified design resistance, one employs structural layers of certain thicknesses and modulus of deformation. Both values need to satisfy the minimum values in accordance with codified requirements. This paper analyzes correlations for the widely applied in engineering practice methods to determine the soil stiffness. The static test methods acknowledged to be exact enough for determining the modulus of deformation for the primary and secondary loadings. As dynamic test methods require significantly less time and financial resources, they are widely accepted in engineering practice. The dynamic methods determine only the dynamic modulus of deformation. Design practice aims to relate it with the static modulus of deformation of the secondary loading. Many countries propose codified correlations, with differing levels of conservatism, to convert the dynamic modulus of deformation into the static one. Developed correlations between the results of the static plate load test and the dynamic plate load tests processed from own test results of different soils are presented and a comparative analysis with other proposed correlations is given.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering
Baltic Journal of Road and Bridge Engineering 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: THE JOURNAL IS DESIGNED FOR PUBLISHING PAPERS CONCERNING THE FOLLOWING AREAS OF RESEARCH: road and bridge research and design, road construction materials and technologies, bridge construction materials and technologies, road and bridge repair, road and bridge maintenance, traffic safety, road and bridge information technologies, environmental issues, road climatology, low-volume roads, normative documentation, quality management and assurance, road infrastructure and its assessment, asset management, road and bridge construction financing, specialist pre-service and in-service training;
期刊最新文献
Traffic Load Model Calibration and Comparison to Evolving Traffic Loads In 2014–2018 Research of Porous Asphalt Concrete Application on Highway Sections with The Increased Aquaplaning Danger Level An Assessment of The Effect of The Average Speed Enforcement Systems on Lithuanian Roads Screen-Out Stones Activated with Mineral Binders and Used as Material for Earth Construction Influence of Nonlinear Analysis Technology on Damage Analysis of Asphalt Pavement Structure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1