Ibrahim Taha: 2016年。第四维度:巴勒斯坦和阿拉伯文学的符号学争论。拿撒勒:阿拉伯语言学院

Basilius Bawardi
{"title":"Ibrahim Taha: 2016年。第四维度:巴勒斯坦和阿拉伯文学的符号学争论。拿撒勒:阿拉伯语言学院","authors":"Basilius Bawardi","doi":"10.17192/META.2019.12.8009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"#12–2019 Book Reviewed University of Minnesota Press, 2018 ISBN-13: 9789659251834 Until recently, literary criticism among the Palestinian minority in Israel was dogmatic and ideological and did not meet the ethical standards of true literary critique. Rather, it was nourished by the ideological activities of the political party frameworks of that minority, mainly the Communist Party (RAKAH) and its newspaper al-ittiḥād (The Unity) and magazine al-ghadd (Tomorrow). The critique focused on praising the literary works for the author’s intentions rather than for qualities of the literary text itself. Conversely, it would purposefully crush a work of literature because of the personality of the author or his political or ideological affiliations. I do not believe that this kind of literary criticism did justice to the texts that developed during the national and social struggle of this minority. This book by Ibrahim Taha attempts to address key questions concerning such literary criticism: what is the current state of the field? What key changes has Palestinian literary criticism in Israel undergone? Given the scarcity of literary criticism, how can one balance between the number of literary texts and methodical academic literary criticism?","PeriodicalId":30565,"journal":{"name":"Middle East Topics Arguments","volume":"12 1","pages":"135-137"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ibrahim Taha: 2016. The Fourth Dimension: Semiotic Debates with Palestinian and Arabic Literatures. Nazareth: The Arabic Language Academy\",\"authors\":\"Basilius Bawardi\",\"doi\":\"10.17192/META.2019.12.8009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"#12–2019 Book Reviewed University of Minnesota Press, 2018 ISBN-13: 9789659251834 Until recently, literary criticism among the Palestinian minority in Israel was dogmatic and ideological and did not meet the ethical standards of true literary critique. Rather, it was nourished by the ideological activities of the political party frameworks of that minority, mainly the Communist Party (RAKAH) and its newspaper al-ittiḥād (The Unity) and magazine al-ghadd (Tomorrow). The critique focused on praising the literary works for the author’s intentions rather than for qualities of the literary text itself. Conversely, it would purposefully crush a work of literature because of the personality of the author or his political or ideological affiliations. I do not believe that this kind of literary criticism did justice to the texts that developed during the national and social struggle of this minority. This book by Ibrahim Taha attempts to address key questions concerning such literary criticism: what is the current state of the field? What key changes has Palestinian literary criticism in Israel undergone? Given the scarcity of literary criticism, how can one balance between the number of literary texts and methodical academic literary criticism?\",\"PeriodicalId\":30565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Middle East Topics Arguments\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"135-137\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Middle East Topics Arguments\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17192/META.2019.12.8009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Middle East Topics Arguments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17192/META.2019.12.8009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

#12–2019明尼苏达大学出版社书评,2018年ISBN-13:9789659251834直到最近,以色列巴勒斯坦少数民族的文学批评是教条主义和意识形态的,不符合真正文学批评的伦理标准。相反,它受到了少数民族政党框架的意识形态活动的滋养,主要是共产党及其报纸ḥād(The Unity)和杂志al-ghadd(Tomorrow)。批评的重点是赞扬文学作品的作者的意图,而不是文学文本本身的品质。相反,由于作者的个性或政治或意识形态背景,它会有目的地粉碎文学作品。我不认为这种文学批评对这个少数民族在民族和社会斗争中发展起来的文本是公正的。易卜拉欣·塔哈的这本书试图解决有关此类文学批评的关键问题:该领域的现状如何?以色列的巴勒斯坦文学批评经历了哪些关键变化?鉴于文学批评的稀缺性,如何在文学文本的数量和有条不紊的学术文学批评之间取得平衡?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Ibrahim Taha: 2016. The Fourth Dimension: Semiotic Debates with Palestinian and Arabic Literatures. Nazareth: The Arabic Language Academy
#12–2019 Book Reviewed University of Minnesota Press, 2018 ISBN-13: 9789659251834 Until recently, literary criticism among the Palestinian minority in Israel was dogmatic and ideological and did not meet the ethical standards of true literary critique. Rather, it was nourished by the ideological activities of the political party frameworks of that minority, mainly the Communist Party (RAKAH) and its newspaper al-ittiḥād (The Unity) and magazine al-ghadd (Tomorrow). The critique focused on praising the literary works for the author’s intentions rather than for qualities of the literary text itself. Conversely, it would purposefully crush a work of literature because of the personality of the author or his political or ideological affiliations. I do not believe that this kind of literary criticism did justice to the texts that developed during the national and social struggle of this minority. This book by Ibrahim Taha attempts to address key questions concerning such literary criticism: what is the current state of the field? What key changes has Palestinian literary criticism in Israel undergone? Given the scarcity of literary criticism, how can one balance between the number of literary texts and methodical academic literary criticism?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Women’s Rights In Egyptian Law: The Legal Battle For A Safer Life Gender in Crisis A Thug, a Revolutionary or Both? Negotiating Masculinity in Post-Revolutionary Egypt Īlāf Badr al-Dīn: ʿIndama hatafū “li-l-abad”. Lughat al-thawra al-sūriyya (When They Chanted "Forever": The Language of the Syrian Revolution), Damascus: Mamdūḥ ʿAdwān 2018. An Intersectional Analysis of Syrian Women’s Participation in Civil Society in the Post-2011 Context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1