让社会科学专业的学生学习统计学:机遇、挑战和障碍

Q3 Mathematics Numeracy Pub Date : 2021-04-01 DOI:10.5038/1936-4660.14.2.1386
Charlotte R Brookfield, Malcolm Williams, Luke S Sloan, Emily Maule
{"title":"让社会科学专业的学生学习统计学:机遇、挑战和障碍","authors":"Charlotte R Brookfield, Malcolm Williams, Luke S Sloan, Emily Maule","doi":"10.5038/1936-4660.14.2.1386","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2012, in a bid to improve the quantitative methods training of social science students in the UK, the £19.5 million Q-Step project was launched. This investment demonstrated a significant commitment to changing how we train social science students in quantitative research methods in the UK. The project has involved eighteen higher education institutions exploring and trialling potential ways of engaging social science students with quantitative approaches.\n This paper reflects on the activities of one Q-Step centre based in the School of Social Sciences at Cardiff University. As well as describing some of the pedagogic changes that have been implemented, the paper draws on data to begin to evaluate the success of new approaches. Specifically, data showing the proportion of students undertaking a quantitative final-year dissertation project is used to measure the impact of these activities. The data presented in this paper suggest that resistance to learning quantitative research methods and engaging with such techniques has decreased. The data also indicates that students see this learning as beneficial for their own employability. Despite this, closer analysis reveals that several students change their mind about employing quantitative methods in their own research part way through their dissertation journey. We argue that while social science students are comfortable learning about quantitative approaches, they are less confident at applying these techniques. Thus, the paper argues that there is a wider challenge of demonstrating the relevance and appropriateness of such approaches to understanding the social world.","PeriodicalId":36166,"journal":{"name":"Numeracy","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging Social Science Students with Statistics: Opportunities, Challenges and Barriers\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte R Brookfield, Malcolm Williams, Luke S Sloan, Emily Maule\",\"doi\":\"10.5038/1936-4660.14.2.1386\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2012, in a bid to improve the quantitative methods training of social science students in the UK, the £19.5 million Q-Step project was launched. This investment demonstrated a significant commitment to changing how we train social science students in quantitative research methods in the UK. The project has involved eighteen higher education institutions exploring and trialling potential ways of engaging social science students with quantitative approaches.\\n This paper reflects on the activities of one Q-Step centre based in the School of Social Sciences at Cardiff University. As well as describing some of the pedagogic changes that have been implemented, the paper draws on data to begin to evaluate the success of new approaches. Specifically, data showing the proportion of students undertaking a quantitative final-year dissertation project is used to measure the impact of these activities. The data presented in this paper suggest that resistance to learning quantitative research methods and engaging with such techniques has decreased. The data also indicates that students see this learning as beneficial for their own employability. Despite this, closer analysis reveals that several students change their mind about employing quantitative methods in their own research part way through their dissertation journey. We argue that while social science students are comfortable learning about quantitative approaches, they are less confident at applying these techniques. Thus, the paper argues that there is a wider challenge of demonstrating the relevance and appropriateness of such approaches to understanding the social world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Numeracy\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Numeracy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.14.2.1386\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Numeracy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5038/1936-4660.14.2.1386","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2012年,为了改善英国社会科学专业学生的定量方法培训,英国启动了耗资1950万英镑的Q-Step项目。这项投资表明了我们对改变我们在英国培养定量研究方法的社会科学学生的方式的重大承诺。该项目涉及18所高等教育机构,探索和试验用定量方法吸引社会科学专业学生的潜在方法。本文反映了设在卡迪夫大学社会科学学院的一个Q-Step中心的活动。除了描述一些已经实施的教学改革外,论文还利用数据开始评估新方法的成功。具体来说,数据显示学生承担定量的最后一年的论文项目的比例是用来衡量这些活动的影响。本文提供的数据表明,对学习定量研究方法和参与这些技术的抵制已经减少。数据还表明,学生们认为这种学习有利于他们自己的就业能力。尽管如此,更仔细的分析表明,一些学生改变了主意,在他们自己的研究中采用定量方法的一部分,通过他们的论文之旅。我们认为,虽然社会科学专业的学生乐于学习定量方法,但他们在应用这些技术方面缺乏信心。因此,本文认为,证明这些方法对理解社会世界的相关性和适当性是一个更广泛的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Engaging Social Science Students with Statistics: Opportunities, Challenges and Barriers
In 2012, in a bid to improve the quantitative methods training of social science students in the UK, the £19.5 million Q-Step project was launched. This investment demonstrated a significant commitment to changing how we train social science students in quantitative research methods in the UK. The project has involved eighteen higher education institutions exploring and trialling potential ways of engaging social science students with quantitative approaches. This paper reflects on the activities of one Q-Step centre based in the School of Social Sciences at Cardiff University. As well as describing some of the pedagogic changes that have been implemented, the paper draws on data to begin to evaluate the success of new approaches. Specifically, data showing the proportion of students undertaking a quantitative final-year dissertation project is used to measure the impact of these activities. The data presented in this paper suggest that resistance to learning quantitative research methods and engaging with such techniques has decreased. The data also indicates that students see this learning as beneficial for their own employability. Despite this, closer analysis reveals that several students change their mind about employing quantitative methods in their own research part way through their dissertation journey. We argue that while social science students are comfortable learning about quantitative approaches, they are less confident at applying these techniques. Thus, the paper argues that there is a wider challenge of demonstrating the relevance and appropriateness of such approaches to understanding the social world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Numeracy
Numeracy Mathematics-Mathematics (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
DESKRIPSI KEMAMPUAN LITERASI MATEMATIKA MAHASISWA PGMI PEMBELAJARAN BERDEFERENSIASI BERBASIS PROBLEM POSING : SEBUAH KAJIAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS PEMBELAJARAN BERDEFERENSIASI BERBASIS PROBLEM POSING : SEBUAH KAJIAN KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN MATEMATIS Infusing Quantitative Reasoning Skills into a Differential Equation Class in an Urban Public Community College Considering What Counts: Measuring Poverty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1