洞察力和同理心:比较职前教师在反思客观和描述性情景学习时的反应

IF 1.6 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Reflective Practice Pub Date : 2022-12-12 DOI:10.1080/14623943.2022.2155126
Nadia Mead
{"title":"洞察力和同理心:比较职前教师在反思客观和描述性情景学习时的反应","authors":"Nadia Mead","doi":"10.1080/14623943.2022.2155126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Stories build empathy and provide insights into character motivations and behaviour. When used in Initial Teacher Education programs, narratives can help pre-service teachers to examine conflict situations from an alternative perspective to their own. This paper shares the results of a qualitative pilot study conducted with pre-service teachers. Participants were asked to read short scenarios depicting two common conflict situations in educational settings: teacher and parent/carer conflict; and disruptive student behaviour. For each scenario, two versions were created. One version was constructed to mimic the kind of objective scenario common to Initial Teacher Education program study materials. The second version was created as a short story complete with characters, figurative language and dialogue. Participants were asked to read both versions of the same event, select their preferences and then explain their choices. The study analysed and thematically coded feedback between Primary and Secondary pre-service teachers. The results show mixed responses to both scenarios that represented a teacher’s perspective of conflict with a parent/carer. In the case of a scenario about disruptive student behaviour, the results indicated a universal preference for the descriptive version. Participants empathised with the student perspective and valued the additional educational insights provided by the storied version.","PeriodicalId":51594,"journal":{"name":"Reflective Practice","volume":"24 1","pages":"197 - 209"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Insight and empathy: comparing the responses of pre-service teachers when reflecting on objective versus descriptive scenario-based learning\",\"authors\":\"Nadia Mead\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14623943.2022.2155126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Stories build empathy and provide insights into character motivations and behaviour. When used in Initial Teacher Education programs, narratives can help pre-service teachers to examine conflict situations from an alternative perspective to their own. This paper shares the results of a qualitative pilot study conducted with pre-service teachers. Participants were asked to read short scenarios depicting two common conflict situations in educational settings: teacher and parent/carer conflict; and disruptive student behaviour. For each scenario, two versions were created. One version was constructed to mimic the kind of objective scenario common to Initial Teacher Education program study materials. The second version was created as a short story complete with characters, figurative language and dialogue. Participants were asked to read both versions of the same event, select their preferences and then explain their choices. The study analysed and thematically coded feedback between Primary and Secondary pre-service teachers. The results show mixed responses to both scenarios that represented a teacher’s perspective of conflict with a parent/carer. In the case of a scenario about disruptive student behaviour, the results indicated a universal preference for the descriptive version. Participants empathised with the student perspective and valued the additional educational insights provided by the storied version.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51594,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"197 - 209\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reflective Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2155126\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reflective Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14623943.2022.2155126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要故事建立了同理心,并提供了对角色动机和行为的见解。当在初级教师教育项目中使用时,叙事可以帮助职前教师从自己的另一个角度审视冲突情况。本文分享了对职前教师进行的定性试点研究的结果。参与者被要求阅读描述教育环境中两种常见冲突情况的简短情景:教师和家长/看护人冲突;以及扰乱学生行为。对于每个场景,都创建了两个版本。一个版本是为了模仿初级教师教育项目学习材料中常见的那种客观场景而构建的。第二个版本是一个短篇故事,包括人物、形象语言和对话。参与者被要求阅读同一事件的两个版本,选择他们的偏好,然后解释他们的选择。该研究分析了小学和中学职前教师之间的反馈,并按主题编码。结果显示,对这两种情景的反应不一,这两种情况代表了教师与家长/看护人冲突的观点。在一个关于破坏性学生行为的场景中,结果表明普遍倾向于描述性版本。参与者对学生的观点感同身受,并重视故事版本提供的额外教育见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Insight and empathy: comparing the responses of pre-service teachers when reflecting on objective versus descriptive scenario-based learning
ABSTRACT Stories build empathy and provide insights into character motivations and behaviour. When used in Initial Teacher Education programs, narratives can help pre-service teachers to examine conflict situations from an alternative perspective to their own. This paper shares the results of a qualitative pilot study conducted with pre-service teachers. Participants were asked to read short scenarios depicting two common conflict situations in educational settings: teacher and parent/carer conflict; and disruptive student behaviour. For each scenario, two versions were created. One version was constructed to mimic the kind of objective scenario common to Initial Teacher Education program study materials. The second version was created as a short story complete with characters, figurative language and dialogue. Participants were asked to read both versions of the same event, select their preferences and then explain their choices. The study analysed and thematically coded feedback between Primary and Secondary pre-service teachers. The results show mixed responses to both scenarios that represented a teacher’s perspective of conflict with a parent/carer. In the case of a scenario about disruptive student behaviour, the results indicated a universal preference for the descriptive version. Participants empathised with the student perspective and valued the additional educational insights provided by the storied version.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reflective Practice
Reflective Practice EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Doing cross-cultural interviews from Vietnamese students’ experience and reflective practice: lessons on intercultural communicative competence Reflection tools – support for patient learning in group education What does inclusion look like within an experiential teaching and assessing reflective learning model? Utilising authentic assessment to foster shared social membership Investigating the development of peer-led asynchronous digitally mediated feedback in higher education: three case studies On the journey from cognizance toward thriving: Iranian EFL teachers’ engagement in reflective practice and professional development: the mediating effect of teacher mindfulness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1