绝育政策与芬兰的吉普赛人

IF 0.2 4区 社会学 Q4 ANTHROPOLOGY Romani Studies Pub Date : 2018-06-01 DOI:10.3828/RS.2018.5
M. Mattila
{"title":"绝育政策与芬兰的吉普赛人","authors":"M. Mattila","doi":"10.3828/RS.2018.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This article examines Finnish eugenic sterilization policy from 1935 to 1970 and how the nation dealt with the largest minority group in the land, the Gypsies. When the sterilization law was first created (1935) and amended (1950), it was largely thought to be a law that applied equally to everyone. Now we know that, in practice, it targeted women and the lower social classes. In light of the existing data, the article argues that the law had somewhat of an ethnic bias: Gypsy women were over-represented among those who received coercive sterilization orders, especially among those whose application for sterilization was favourably received by the Finnish Medical Board. There are also some traits that indicate that Gypsy women may have been compelled to apply for sterilization. Particularly problematic applications were those sent by female prisoners: how voluntary was such an application for sterilization when sent from prison?","PeriodicalId":52533,"journal":{"name":"Romani Studies","volume":"28 1","pages":"109 - 139"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3828/RS.2018.5","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sterilization policy and Gypsies in Finland\",\"authors\":\"M. Mattila\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/RS.2018.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This article examines Finnish eugenic sterilization policy from 1935 to 1970 and how the nation dealt with the largest minority group in the land, the Gypsies. When the sterilization law was first created (1935) and amended (1950), it was largely thought to be a law that applied equally to everyone. Now we know that, in practice, it targeted women and the lower social classes. In light of the existing data, the article argues that the law had somewhat of an ethnic bias: Gypsy women were over-represented among those who received coercive sterilization orders, especially among those whose application for sterilization was favourably received by the Finnish Medical Board. There are also some traits that indicate that Gypsy women may have been compelled to apply for sterilization. Particularly problematic applications were those sent by female prisoners: how voluntary was such an application for sterilization when sent from prison?\",\"PeriodicalId\":52533,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Romani Studies\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"109 - 139\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3828/RS.2018.5\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Romani Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/RS.2018.5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Romani Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/RS.2018.5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:本文考察了1935年至1970年芬兰的优生绝育政策,以及该国如何应对该国最大的少数民族吉普赛人。当绝育法首次制定(1935年)和修订(1950年)时,人们普遍认为这是一项平等适用于所有人的法律。现在我们知道,在实践中,它针对的是女性和下层社会阶层。根据现有数据,文章认为,该法律有一定的种族偏见:吉普赛妇女在接受强制绝育命令的人中比例过高,尤其是在芬兰医疗委员会积极接受绝育申请的人中。还有一些特征表明,吉普赛妇女可能被迫申请绝育。特别有问题的申请是由女性囚犯发送的:从监狱发送的绝育申请是多么自愿?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sterilization policy and Gypsies in Finland
Abstract:This article examines Finnish eugenic sterilization policy from 1935 to 1970 and how the nation dealt with the largest minority group in the land, the Gypsies. When the sterilization law was first created (1935) and amended (1950), it was largely thought to be a law that applied equally to everyone. Now we know that, in practice, it targeted women and the lower social classes. In light of the existing data, the article argues that the law had somewhat of an ethnic bias: Gypsy women were over-represented among those who received coercive sterilization orders, especially among those whose application for sterilization was favourably received by the Finnish Medical Board. There are also some traits that indicate that Gypsy women may have been compelled to apply for sterilization. Particularly problematic applications were those sent by female prisoners: how voluntary was such an application for sterilization when sent from prison?
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Romani Studies
Romani Studies Social Sciences-Cultural Studies
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
50.00%
发文量
9
期刊介绍: Founded in 1888, the Journal of the Gypsy Lore Society was published in four series up to 1982. In 2000, the journal became Romani Studies. On behalf of the Gypsy Lore Society, Romani Studies features articles on many different communities which, regardless of their origins and self-appellations in various languages, have been referred to in English as Gypsies. These communities include the descendants of migrants from the Indian subcontinent which have been considered as falling into three large subdivisions, Dom, Lom, and Rom. The field has also included communities of other origins which practice, or in the past have practiced, a specific type of service nomadism. The journal publishes articles in history, anthropology, ethnography, sociology, linguistics, art, literature, folklore and music, as well as reviews of books and audiovisual materials.
期刊最新文献
Invincible racism? The misuse of genetically informed arguments against Roma in Central and Eastern Europe Editorial: Epistemologies in Romani studies: Moving beyond othering otherness Fashion and pilgrimage: Discourses constructing Romani identity Discursive subjugation and the ways out: Narratives of othering among Czech Roma mothers Romani American history: Historical absences and their consequences
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1