{"title":"当代:Telaah terhadap Seyyed Hossein Nasr和Tim的《古兰经研究》新译本和评论","authors":"Annas Rolli Muchlisin","doi":"10.21274/epis.2017.12.2.287-310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two years ago, a Qur’anic translation and interpretation work was published in English which was initiated by Seyyed Hossein Nasr and his team: CanerK. Dagli, Maria Massi Dakake, Joseph E. B. Lumbard, and Mohammed Rustom. The work that they named as the Study Quran A New Translation and Commentary covers both translation and interpretation of the Qur’an in fully 30 chapters, and was added by some essays written by scholars from various academic and country backgrounds. In other side, this work represents Nasr and his team’s thought on “tradition”. For them, tradition is not like was understood by several people who consider it as something old-fashioned, but rather as a set of principles that revealed from God. In some places, this traditionalist insight emerges in their interpretation. This paper attempts to study on the methodology used in the work and to see its position in hermeneutics typology. From that study, it could be seen some interpretation principles held by its authors, such as emphasizing the sacred nature of the Qur’an, explaining that the Qur’an contains all doctrines about reality natures in all of its levels, using universalist perspective in comprehending Qur’anic verses that related to religious traditions, and presenting traditional Qur’anic interpretation.From hermeneutics typology, this work could be categorized in obyektivis-cum-subjektivis interpretation.","PeriodicalId":31250,"journal":{"name":"Episteme Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman","volume":"12 1","pages":"287-310"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KESARJANAAN TRADISIONALIS AL-QUR’AN DI ERA KONTEMPORER: Telaah terhadap The Study Quran a New Translation and Commentary karya Seyyed Hossein Nasr dan Tim\",\"authors\":\"Annas Rolli Muchlisin\",\"doi\":\"10.21274/epis.2017.12.2.287-310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two years ago, a Qur’anic translation and interpretation work was published in English which was initiated by Seyyed Hossein Nasr and his team: CanerK. Dagli, Maria Massi Dakake, Joseph E. B. Lumbard, and Mohammed Rustom. The work that they named as the Study Quran A New Translation and Commentary covers both translation and interpretation of the Qur’an in fully 30 chapters, and was added by some essays written by scholars from various academic and country backgrounds. In other side, this work represents Nasr and his team’s thought on “tradition”. For them, tradition is not like was understood by several people who consider it as something old-fashioned, but rather as a set of principles that revealed from God. In some places, this traditionalist insight emerges in their interpretation. This paper attempts to study on the methodology used in the work and to see its position in hermeneutics typology. From that study, it could be seen some interpretation principles held by its authors, such as emphasizing the sacred nature of the Qur’an, explaining that the Qur’an contains all doctrines about reality natures in all of its levels, using universalist perspective in comprehending Qur’anic verses that related to religious traditions, and presenting traditional Qur’anic interpretation.From hermeneutics typology, this work could be categorized in obyektivis-cum-subjektivis interpretation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Episteme Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"287-310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Episteme Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2017.12.2.287-310\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Episteme Jurnal Pengembangan Ilmu Keislaman","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21274/epis.2017.12.2.287-310","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
两年前,Seyyed Hossein Nasr和他的团队CanerK以英语出版了《古兰经》的翻译和口译作品。Dagli、Maria Massi Dakake、Joseph E.B.Lumbard和Mohammed Rustom。他们将这部作品命名为《古兰经研究——新译本和评注》,共30章,涵盖了《古兰经》的翻译和阐释,并添加了来自不同学术和国家背景的学者撰写的一些文章。另一方面,这部作品代表了纳斯尔及其团队对“传统”的思考。对他们来说,传统并不像一些人所理解的那样,他们认为传统是老式的东西,而是上帝揭示的一套原则。在一些地方,这种传统主义的见解出现在他们的解释中。本文试图研究这部作品所使用的方法论,并了解其在解释学类型学中的地位。从该研究中可以看出作者所持的一些解释原则,如强调《古兰经》的神圣性,解释《古兰经在各个层面上都包含了关于现实性的所有学说,使用普遍主义视角理解与宗教传统有关的古兰经诗句,以及呈现传统的古兰经解释。从解释学的类型学角度来看,这部作品可以被归类为obyektivis和subjektivis解释。
KESARJANAAN TRADISIONALIS AL-QUR’AN DI ERA KONTEMPORER: Telaah terhadap The Study Quran a New Translation and Commentary karya Seyyed Hossein Nasr dan Tim
Two years ago, a Qur’anic translation and interpretation work was published in English which was initiated by Seyyed Hossein Nasr and his team: CanerK. Dagli, Maria Massi Dakake, Joseph E. B. Lumbard, and Mohammed Rustom. The work that they named as the Study Quran A New Translation and Commentary covers both translation and interpretation of the Qur’an in fully 30 chapters, and was added by some essays written by scholars from various academic and country backgrounds. In other side, this work represents Nasr and his team’s thought on “tradition”. For them, tradition is not like was understood by several people who consider it as something old-fashioned, but rather as a set of principles that revealed from God. In some places, this traditionalist insight emerges in their interpretation. This paper attempts to study on the methodology used in the work and to see its position in hermeneutics typology. From that study, it could be seen some interpretation principles held by its authors, such as emphasizing the sacred nature of the Qur’an, explaining that the Qur’an contains all doctrines about reality natures in all of its levels, using universalist perspective in comprehending Qur’anic verses that related to religious traditions, and presenting traditional Qur’anic interpretation.From hermeneutics typology, this work could be categorized in obyektivis-cum-subjektivis interpretation.