天才与人才发展研究的合作

IF 1.2 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED Pub Date : 2020-03-24 DOI:10.1177/0162353220912019
Matthew C. Makel, Kendal N. Smith, E. Miller, S. Peters, Matthew T. McBee
{"title":"天才与人才发展研究的合作","authors":"Matthew C. Makel, Kendal N. Smith, E. Miller, S. Peters, Matthew T. McBee","doi":"10.1177/0162353220912019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Existing research practices in gifted education have many areas for potential improvement so that they can provide useful, generalizable evidence to various stakeholders. In this article, we first review the field’s current research practices and consider the quality and utility of its research findings. Next, we discuss how open science practices increase the transparency of research so readers can more effectively evaluate its validity. Third, we introduce five large-scale collaborative research models that are being used in other fields and discuss how they could be implemented in gifted education research. Finally, we review potential challenges and limitations to implementing collaborative research models in gifted education. We believe greater use of large-scale collaboration will help the field overcome some of its methodological challenges to help provide more precise and accurate information about gifted education.","PeriodicalId":51648,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED","volume":"43 1","pages":"107 - 91"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0162353220912019","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaboration in Giftedness and Talent Development Research\",\"authors\":\"Matthew C. Makel, Kendal N. Smith, E. Miller, S. Peters, Matthew T. McBee\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0162353220912019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Existing research practices in gifted education have many areas for potential improvement so that they can provide useful, generalizable evidence to various stakeholders. In this article, we first review the field’s current research practices and consider the quality and utility of its research findings. Next, we discuss how open science practices increase the transparency of research so readers can more effectively evaluate its validity. Third, we introduce five large-scale collaborative research models that are being used in other fields and discuss how they could be implemented in gifted education research. Finally, we review potential challenges and limitations to implementing collaborative research models in gifted education. We believe greater use of large-scale collaboration will help the field overcome some of its methodological challenges to help provide more precise and accurate information about gifted education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 91\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0162353220912019\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353220912019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353220912019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

现有的资优教育研究实践有许多有待改进的地方,可以为不同的利益相关者提供有用的、可推广的证据。在本文中,我们首先回顾了该领域目前的研究实践,并考虑了其研究成果的质量和效用。接下来,我们将讨论开放科学实践如何提高研究的透明度,以便读者能够更有效地评估其有效性。第三,我们介绍了在其他领域正在使用的五种大规模合作研究模式,并讨论了它们如何在资优教育研究中实施。最后,我们回顾了在资优教育中实施合作研究模式的潜在挑战和限制。我们相信,更多地利用大规模合作将有助于该领域克服一些方法论上的挑战,以帮助提供有关资优教育的更精确和准确的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Collaboration in Giftedness and Talent Development Research
Existing research practices in gifted education have many areas for potential improvement so that they can provide useful, generalizable evidence to various stakeholders. In this article, we first review the field’s current research practices and consider the quality and utility of its research findings. Next, we discuss how open science practices increase the transparency of research so readers can more effectively evaluate its validity. Third, we introduce five large-scale collaborative research models that are being used in other fields and discuss how they could be implemented in gifted education research. Finally, we review potential challenges and limitations to implementing collaborative research models in gifted education. We believe greater use of large-scale collaboration will help the field overcome some of its methodological challenges to help provide more precise and accurate information about gifted education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Developing Hidden Talent: An Exploratory Study of Advanced Math Curriculum Implementation and Its Effects on Young Mathematically Promising English Learners Extending Research on Psychosocial Skills and Appropriate Instruction in Developing Talents Conducting Research on Psychosocial Skills Associated with Academic Talent Development Gifted Students’ Academic Motivation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study in Croatia, Serbia, and Slovenia Young Adult Career Outcomes for Adolescents With ADHD, High Ability, or Twice-Exceptionality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1