澳大利亚不同人群吸烟状况的差异

IF 1 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Health Education Pub Date : 2021-05-12 DOI:10.1108/HE-12-2020-0124
Julian de Meyrick, F. Yusuf
{"title":"澳大利亚不同人群吸烟状况的差异","authors":"Julian de Meyrick, F. Yusuf","doi":"10.1108/HE-12-2020-0124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to identify correlates of tobacco smoking behaviour across various socio-demographic segments of the Australian population.Design/methodology/approachData from two nationally representative, probability samples of persons 18 and over, surveyed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in 2001 and 2017–2018 were analysed using multinomial logistic regression.FindingsOverall, the prevalence of current smokers declined from 24.3 to 15%. More than half of the population had never smoked. The prevalence of ex-smokers increased slightly to 30%. Prevalence of current smoking was higher among older age groups and among those with lower educational achievement, lower income, living in a disadvantaged area and experiencing increasing stress. Females were more likely than males to be never-smokers. Males were more likely than females to be current smokers.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings are based on two cross-sectional surveys conducted 17 years apart. It is not possible to draw any conclusions about the actual trajectories of the changes in the values reported or any correlations between those trajectories. Nor is it possible to make any meaningful forecasts about likely future trends in smoking status in these various segments based on these data sets. The classifications used in the surveys generate some heterogeneous groups, which can obscure important differences among respondents within groups. Data are all self-reported, and there is no validation of the self-reported smoking status. This might lead to under-reporting, especially in a community where tobacco smoking is no longer a majority or even a popular habit. Because the surveys are so large, virtually, all the findings are statistically significant. However, the increasing preponderance of never-smokers in many categories might mean that never-smokers could come to dominate the data.Practical implicationsThe findings from this paper will help tobacco-control policy-makers to augment whole-of-community initiatives with individual campaigns designed to be more effective with particular socio-demographic segments. They will also assist in ensuring better alignment between initiatives addressing mental health and tobacco smoking problems facing the community.Originality/valueThe examination of smoking behaviour among individual population sub-groups, chosen by the authors, is commonplace in the literature. This paper uses data from two large surveys to model the whole, heterogeneous population, measured at two different points in time.","PeriodicalId":47067,"journal":{"name":"Health Education","volume":"121 1","pages":"436-450"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in tobacco smoking status in segments of the Australian population\",\"authors\":\"Julian de Meyrick, F. Yusuf\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/HE-12-2020-0124\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeThe purpose of this study is to identify correlates of tobacco smoking behaviour across various socio-demographic segments of the Australian population.Design/methodology/approachData from two nationally representative, probability samples of persons 18 and over, surveyed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in 2001 and 2017–2018 were analysed using multinomial logistic regression.FindingsOverall, the prevalence of current smokers declined from 24.3 to 15%. More than half of the population had never smoked. The prevalence of ex-smokers increased slightly to 30%. Prevalence of current smoking was higher among older age groups and among those with lower educational achievement, lower income, living in a disadvantaged area and experiencing increasing stress. Females were more likely than males to be never-smokers. Males were more likely than females to be current smokers.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings are based on two cross-sectional surveys conducted 17 years apart. It is not possible to draw any conclusions about the actual trajectories of the changes in the values reported or any correlations between those trajectories. Nor is it possible to make any meaningful forecasts about likely future trends in smoking status in these various segments based on these data sets. The classifications used in the surveys generate some heterogeneous groups, which can obscure important differences among respondents within groups. Data are all self-reported, and there is no validation of the self-reported smoking status. This might lead to under-reporting, especially in a community where tobacco smoking is no longer a majority or even a popular habit. Because the surveys are so large, virtually, all the findings are statistically significant. However, the increasing preponderance of never-smokers in many categories might mean that never-smokers could come to dominate the data.Practical implicationsThe findings from this paper will help tobacco-control policy-makers to augment whole-of-community initiatives with individual campaigns designed to be more effective with particular socio-demographic segments. They will also assist in ensuring better alignment between initiatives addressing mental health and tobacco smoking problems facing the community.Originality/valueThe examination of smoking behaviour among individual population sub-groups, chosen by the authors, is commonplace in the literature. This paper uses data from two large surveys to model the whole, heterogeneous population, measured at two different points in time.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Education\",\"volume\":\"121 1\",\"pages\":\"436-450\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-12-2020-0124\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/HE-12-2020-0124","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的本研究的目的是确定澳大利亚人口中不同社会人口部分吸烟行为的相关性。设计/方法/方法来自2001年和2017-2018年澳大利亚统计局调查的两个具有全国代表性的18岁及以上人群的概率样本的数据,使用多项逻辑回归进行了分析。总体而言,当前吸烟者的患病率从24.3%下降到15%。超过一半的人从不吸烟。戒烟者的患病率略有上升,达到30%。年龄较大的人群、教育程度较低的人群、收入较低的人群、生活在弱势地区的人群以及压力越来越大的人群中,目前吸烟的患病率较高。女性比男性更有可能不吸烟。男性比女性更有可能成为吸烟者。研究的局限性/意义这些发现是基于相隔17年的两次横断面调查。对于所报告的数值变化的实际轨迹或这些轨迹之间的任何相关性,不可能得出任何结论。基于这些数据集,也不可能对这些不同细分市场的吸烟状况的未来可能趋势做出任何有意义的预测。调查中使用的分类产生了一些异质群体,这可能掩盖了群体内受访者之间的重要差异。数据都是自我报告的,没有对自我报告吸烟状况的验证。这可能导致报告不足,特别是在吸烟不再是多数人甚至不再是流行习惯的社区。由于调查的规模很大,几乎所有的发现都具有统计意义。然而,在许多类别中,从不吸烟者的优势日益增加,这可能意味着从不吸烟者可能会主导数据。实际意义本论文的研究结果将有助于烟草控制政策制定者通过针对特定社会人口群体的更有效的个人运动来扩大整个社区的倡议。它们还将协助确保解决社区面临的精神卫生和吸烟问题的各项举措更好地协调一致。独创性/价值由作者选择的对单个人群亚组的吸烟行为的检查在文献中是司空见惯的。本文使用来自两个大型调查的数据来模拟在两个不同时间点测量的整个异质人口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in tobacco smoking status in segments of the Australian population
PurposeThe purpose of this study is to identify correlates of tobacco smoking behaviour across various socio-demographic segments of the Australian population.Design/methodology/approachData from two nationally representative, probability samples of persons 18 and over, surveyed by the Australian Bureau of Statistics in 2001 and 2017–2018 were analysed using multinomial logistic regression.FindingsOverall, the prevalence of current smokers declined from 24.3 to 15%. More than half of the population had never smoked. The prevalence of ex-smokers increased slightly to 30%. Prevalence of current smoking was higher among older age groups and among those with lower educational achievement, lower income, living in a disadvantaged area and experiencing increasing stress. Females were more likely than males to be never-smokers. Males were more likely than females to be current smokers.Research limitations/implicationsThe findings are based on two cross-sectional surveys conducted 17 years apart. It is not possible to draw any conclusions about the actual trajectories of the changes in the values reported or any correlations between those trajectories. Nor is it possible to make any meaningful forecasts about likely future trends in smoking status in these various segments based on these data sets. The classifications used in the surveys generate some heterogeneous groups, which can obscure important differences among respondents within groups. Data are all self-reported, and there is no validation of the self-reported smoking status. This might lead to under-reporting, especially in a community where tobacco smoking is no longer a majority or even a popular habit. Because the surveys are so large, virtually, all the findings are statistically significant. However, the increasing preponderance of never-smokers in many categories might mean that never-smokers could come to dominate the data.Practical implicationsThe findings from this paper will help tobacco-control policy-makers to augment whole-of-community initiatives with individual campaigns designed to be more effective with particular socio-demographic segments. They will also assist in ensuring better alignment between initiatives addressing mental health and tobacco smoking problems facing the community.Originality/valueThe examination of smoking behaviour among individual population sub-groups, chosen by the authors, is commonplace in the literature. This paper uses data from two large surveys to model the whole, heterogeneous population, measured at two different points in time.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Education
Health Education PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The range of topics covered is necessarily extremely wide. Recent examples include: ■Sex and sexuality ■Mental health ■Occupational health education ■Health communication ■The arts and health ■Personal change ■Healthy eating ■User involvement ■Drug and tobacco education ■Ethical issues in health education ■Developing the evidence base
期刊最新文献
Health literacy and subjective well-being amongst university students: moderating role of gender Psychological impact of COVID-19 on university students in Oman: an examination of stress, resilience and meaning in life ІСТОРИЧНИЙ ПОСТУП РОЗВИТКУ ТА ТРАНСФОРМАЦІЇ МЕДСЕСТРИНСЬКОЇ ОСВІТИ В УКРАЇНІ ТА СВІТІ ОБҐРУНТУВАННЯ НАПРЯМІВ ПІДВИЩЕННЯ ЕФЕКТИВНОСТІ ФАРМАЦЕВТИЧНОГО ЗАБЕЗПЕЧЕННЯ ХВОРИХ НА ФЕНІЛКЕТОНУРІЮ ОСОБЛИВОСТІ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ АПТЕК У ВОЄННИЙ ЧАС НА ПРИКЛАДІ ЛОКАЛЬНИХ МЕРЕЖ РІВНЕНСЬКОЇ ОБЛАСТІ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1