宪法的模式

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW Pravni Vjesnik Pub Date : 2020-04-01 DOI:10.25234/pv/8608
Jasmin Hušić
{"title":"宪法的模式","authors":"Jasmin Hušić","doi":"10.25234/pv/8608","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper deals with typing of the revision models of actual constitutions in the world, star-ting from the role and importance of the constitution’s revision subjects in the constitution’s revision process. Based on the established features of the constitutional rules on way and po-ssibilities of revising the constitution, the author determines five basic revising constitution models: a) the parliamentary model, b) the referendum model, c) the parliamentary-referen-dum model, d) unipersonal model, and e) the combined or mixed model. Within the scope of these models, eight types and four subtypes of the revision of the constitution are differentia-ted. The parliamentary model is characterized by the decisive role of parliament with certain variations (five types) of this model. In the referendum model, the citizen’s expression is the primary characteristic. Constitutional changes cannot be made and no possibility of annul-ment of the results of the referendum can be determined without the consent of the citizens. The parliamentary-referendum is specific for approximately same importance of the decision of the parliament and the citizens, as none of these entities can independently decide on the changes. However, this model also has certain variations (types). The unipersonal model im-plies constitutional legal systems in which the changes of the constitution are decided by a unipersonal authority. The mixed model is particularly specific because of the possibility of making decisions by different bodies, independently. In addition, the paper provides an overview of the basic constitutional mechanisms of restri-cting and preventing the constitution change, such as a) the complexity of the procedure, b) the limitation of the initiation and submission of proposals, c) the quorum and the majority, d) the eternity clauses. In addition, the paper provides an overview of the basic constitutional mechanisms of restri-cting and preventing the constitution change, such as a) the complexity of the procedure, b) the limitation of the initiation and submission of proposals, c) the quorum and the majority, d) the eternity clauses.","PeriodicalId":41100,"journal":{"name":"Pravni Vjesnik","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MODELI REVIZIJE USTAVA\",\"authors\":\"Jasmin Hušić\",\"doi\":\"10.25234/pv/8608\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper deals with typing of the revision models of actual constitutions in the world, star-ting from the role and importance of the constitution’s revision subjects in the constitution’s revision process. Based on the established features of the constitutional rules on way and po-ssibilities of revising the constitution, the author determines five basic revising constitution models: a) the parliamentary model, b) the referendum model, c) the parliamentary-referen-dum model, d) unipersonal model, and e) the combined or mixed model. Within the scope of these models, eight types and four subtypes of the revision of the constitution are differentia-ted. The parliamentary model is characterized by the decisive role of parliament with certain variations (five types) of this model. In the referendum model, the citizen’s expression is the primary characteristic. Constitutional changes cannot be made and no possibility of annul-ment of the results of the referendum can be determined without the consent of the citizens. The parliamentary-referendum is specific for approximately same importance of the decision of the parliament and the citizens, as none of these entities can independently decide on the changes. However, this model also has certain variations (types). The unipersonal model im-plies constitutional legal systems in which the changes of the constitution are decided by a unipersonal authority. The mixed model is particularly specific because of the possibility of making decisions by different bodies, independently. In addition, the paper provides an overview of the basic constitutional mechanisms of restri-cting and preventing the constitution change, such as a) the complexity of the procedure, b) the limitation of the initiation and submission of proposals, c) the quorum and the majority, d) the eternity clauses. In addition, the paper provides an overview of the basic constitutional mechanisms of restri-cting and preventing the constitution change, such as a) the complexity of the procedure, b) the limitation of the initiation and submission of proposals, c) the quorum and the majority, d) the eternity clauses.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41100,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pravni Vjesnik\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pravni Vjesnik\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/8608\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pravni Vjesnik","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25234/pv/8608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文从宪法修改主体在宪法修改过程中的作用和重要性出发,对世界上实际宪法的修改模式进行了分类。根据宪法规则对修宪方式和可能性的既定特征,确定了五种基本的修宪模式:a)议会模式,b)公民投票模式,c)议会全民投票模式,d)个人模式,e)组合或混合模式。在这些模型的范围内,对宪法修正的八种类型和四种亚型进行了区分。议会模式的特点是议会的决定性作用,这种模式有某些变体(五种类型)。在公民投票模式中,公民的表达是首要特征。未经公民同意,不能修改宪法,也不能确定取消公民投票结果的可能性。议会公民投票是针对议会和公民的决定的大致相同的重要性而进行的,因为这些实体都无法独立决定这些变化。然而,该模型也有某些变体(类型)。个人模式适用于宪法法律体系,其中宪法的变化由个人权威决定。混合模式特别具体,因为有可能由不同机构独立做出决定。此外,本文还概述了限制和防止宪法变更的基本宪法机制,如a)程序的复杂性,b)提案发起和提交的限制,c)法定人数和多数,d)永恒条款。此外,本文还概述了限制和防止宪法变更的基本宪法机制,如a)程序的复杂性,b)提案发起和提交的限制,c)法定人数和多数,d)永恒条款。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
MODELI REVIZIJE USTAVA
The paper deals with typing of the revision models of actual constitutions in the world, star-ting from the role and importance of the constitution’s revision subjects in the constitution’s revision process. Based on the established features of the constitutional rules on way and po-ssibilities of revising the constitution, the author determines five basic revising constitution models: a) the parliamentary model, b) the referendum model, c) the parliamentary-referen-dum model, d) unipersonal model, and e) the combined or mixed model. Within the scope of these models, eight types and four subtypes of the revision of the constitution are differentia-ted. The parliamentary model is characterized by the decisive role of parliament with certain variations (five types) of this model. In the referendum model, the citizen’s expression is the primary characteristic. Constitutional changes cannot be made and no possibility of annul-ment of the results of the referendum can be determined without the consent of the citizens. The parliamentary-referendum is specific for approximately same importance of the decision of the parliament and the citizens, as none of these entities can independently decide on the changes. However, this model also has certain variations (types). The unipersonal model im-plies constitutional legal systems in which the changes of the constitution are decided by a unipersonal authority. The mixed model is particularly specific because of the possibility of making decisions by different bodies, independently. In addition, the paper provides an overview of the basic constitutional mechanisms of restri-cting and preventing the constitution change, such as a) the complexity of the procedure, b) the limitation of the initiation and submission of proposals, c) the quorum and the majority, d) the eternity clauses. In addition, the paper provides an overview of the basic constitutional mechanisms of restri-cting and preventing the constitution change, such as a) the complexity of the procedure, b) the limitation of the initiation and submission of proposals, c) the quorum and the majority, d) the eternity clauses.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
PRIKAZ KNJIGE: BRANKA REŠETAR, KOMENTAR OBITELJSKOG ZAKONA (KNJIGA I.), ORGANIZATOR D.O.O., ZAGREB, 2022. SINTAGME S FUNKCIONALNIM GLAGOLIMA KAO IZAZOV U PREVOĐENJU PRAVNIH TEKSTOVA S NJEMAČKOGA NA HRVATSKI JEZIK OBITELJSKOPRAVNA REGULACIJA CRESKO-OSORSKOG STATUTA IZ 1441. GODINE TROUBLED WATERS : CROATIAN SEASHORE AS RES EXTRA COMMERCIUM IN COMMERCIO NAGODBA (PORAVNANJE) KAO POSEBNI INSTITUT UGOVORNOG PRAVA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1