两种几何相似吊舱推进器的推进性能研究

IF 0.7 4区 工程技术 Q4 ENGINEERING, MARINE International Journal of Maritime Engineering Pub Date : 2021-12-13 DOI:10.5750/ijme.v155ia4.909
M. Islam, A. Akinturk, B. Veitch, Pengfei Liu
{"title":"两种几何相似吊舱推进器的推进性能研究","authors":"M. Islam, A. Akinturk, B. Veitch, Pengfei Liu","doi":"10.5750/ijme.v155ia4.909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents the outcome of a research to evaluate the effect of size on the propulsive performance of podded propulsors in cavitating and non-cavitating open water conditions. Two cases are examined, namely: propeller-only case and pod-unit case. In the propeller-only case, a commercial propeller dynamometer is used to measure the thrust and torque of two propellers of different size at the four quadrants of propellers with varied shaft and flow speeds. Also, both propellers are tested at different tunnel pressure to study and compare the behaviour under similar cavitation conditions. In the pod-unit case, two geometrically similar but different sized pod-units are tested using two separate custom-made pod dynamometer systems in two towing tank facilities in straight-ahead and static azimuthing conditions. The study showed that the performance characteristics stabilize at lower Reynolds Number for the smaller propeller than the larger propeller. The propulsive performance of the two propellers was comparable in the four-quadrant experiments. Also, the experiments at the cavitating conditions showed that the cavitation characteristics of the two propellers were consistent at corresponding operating conditions. The experiment results of the two pod-units were also comparable for forces and moments in the three coordinate directions in the straight-ahead and static azimuthing conditions. A brief discussion on the uncertainty assessments for each of the measurements is also presented.","PeriodicalId":50313,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Maritime Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"STUDY ON PROPULSIVE PERFORMANCE OF TWO GEOMETRICALLY SIMILAR PODDED PROPULSORS\",\"authors\":\"M. Islam, A. Akinturk, B. Veitch, Pengfei Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.5750/ijme.v155ia4.909\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper presents the outcome of a research to evaluate the effect of size on the propulsive performance of podded propulsors in cavitating and non-cavitating open water conditions. Two cases are examined, namely: propeller-only case and pod-unit case. In the propeller-only case, a commercial propeller dynamometer is used to measure the thrust and torque of two propellers of different size at the four quadrants of propellers with varied shaft and flow speeds. Also, both propellers are tested at different tunnel pressure to study and compare the behaviour under similar cavitation conditions. In the pod-unit case, two geometrically similar but different sized pod-units are tested using two separate custom-made pod dynamometer systems in two towing tank facilities in straight-ahead and static azimuthing conditions. The study showed that the performance characteristics stabilize at lower Reynolds Number for the smaller propeller than the larger propeller. The propulsive performance of the two propellers was comparable in the four-quadrant experiments. Also, the experiments at the cavitating conditions showed that the cavitation characteristics of the two propellers were consistent at corresponding operating conditions. The experiment results of the two pod-units were also comparable for forces and moments in the three coordinate directions in the straight-ahead and static azimuthing conditions. A brief discussion on the uncertainty assessments for each of the measurements is also presented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Maritime Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Maritime Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5750/ijme.v155ia4.909\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MARINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Maritime Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/ijme.v155ia4.909","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MARINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了在空化和非空化开放水域条件下,尺寸对吊舱推进器推进性能影响的研究结果。检查了两种情况,即:螺旋桨情况和吊舱单位情况。在仅螺旋桨的情况下,使用商用螺旋桨测功仪在不同轴向和流速的螺旋桨的四个象限上测量两个不同尺寸的螺旋桨的推力和扭矩。此外,两种螺旋桨在不同的隧道压力下进行了测试,以研究和比较在相似空化条件下的性能。在吊舱单元的情况下,两个几何形状相似但尺寸不同的吊舱单元使用两个单独的定制吊舱测力计系统在两个牵引罐设施中进行测试,分别在直线前进和静态方位条件下进行测试。研究表明,在较低雷诺数下,小型螺旋桨的性能特性比大型螺旋桨稳定。在四象限实验中,两种螺旋桨的推进性能相当。在空化条件下的实验表明,两种螺旋桨的空化特性在相应的工况下是一致的。在竖直方向和静止方位条件下,两个吊舱单元在三个坐标方向上的力和力矩的实验结果也具有可比性。本文还简要讨论了每种测量方法的不确定度评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
STUDY ON PROPULSIVE PERFORMANCE OF TWO GEOMETRICALLY SIMILAR PODDED PROPULSORS
This paper presents the outcome of a research to evaluate the effect of size on the propulsive performance of podded propulsors in cavitating and non-cavitating open water conditions. Two cases are examined, namely: propeller-only case and pod-unit case. In the propeller-only case, a commercial propeller dynamometer is used to measure the thrust and torque of two propellers of different size at the four quadrants of propellers with varied shaft and flow speeds. Also, both propellers are tested at different tunnel pressure to study and compare the behaviour under similar cavitation conditions. In the pod-unit case, two geometrically similar but different sized pod-units are tested using two separate custom-made pod dynamometer systems in two towing tank facilities in straight-ahead and static azimuthing conditions. The study showed that the performance characteristics stabilize at lower Reynolds Number for the smaller propeller than the larger propeller. The propulsive performance of the two propellers was comparable in the four-quadrant experiments. Also, the experiments at the cavitating conditions showed that the cavitation characteristics of the two propellers were consistent at corresponding operating conditions. The experiment results of the two pod-units were also comparable for forces and moments in the three coordinate directions in the straight-ahead and static azimuthing conditions. A brief discussion on the uncertainty assessments for each of the measurements is also presented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Maritime Engineering (IJME) provides a forum for the reporting and discussion on technical and scientific issues associated with the design and construction of commercial marine vessels . Contributions in the form of papers and notes, together with discussion on published papers are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
SEAFARER SELECTION FOR SUSTAINABLE SHIPPING: CASE STUDY FOR TURKEY VOYAGE SPEED OPTIMIZATION USING GENETIC ALGORITHM METHODOLOGY APPLIED TO STUDY WATER MIST AS AN INFRARED SIGNATURE SUPPRESSOR IN MARINE GAS TURBINES EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF A VARIABLE BUOYANCY SYSTEM FOR LOW DEPTH OPERATION AN APPLICATION OF AGENT-BASED TRAFFIC FLOW MODEL FOR MARITIME SAFETY MANAGEMENT EVALUATION
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1