开发一种筛查工具来识别印度有语言迟缓风险的婴儿:初步研究

IF 1.3 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Acquisition Pub Date : 2022-06-21 DOI:10.1080/10489223.2022.2078212
Siddhi Pathak, Pallavi Sovani-Kelkar
{"title":"开发一种筛查工具来识别印度有语言迟缓风险的婴儿:初步研究","authors":"Siddhi Pathak, Pallavi Sovani-Kelkar","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2022.2078212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Early identification of language delay is important as it has a serious impact on a child’s life in terms of educational, social, and emotional development. Among the early language screening tools, there are some parent-administered tools; however, they are not culturally appropriate or freely available. This article documents the development and preliminary validation of a quick and easy-to-administer language screening tool for babies from 6 to 18 months of age. Parents of 100 babies ranging in age from 6 to 21 months were included in the study. The babies were classified into five screening levels according to their age. The items of a Screening Test of Early Language Development-Test version (STELD-T) were created and validated through expert opinion. The STELD-T was administered along with the Receptive Expressive Emergent Language Scale (REELS). Internal consistency using the Kuder-Richardson Formula-20 ranged from 0.457 to 0.853 across the five levels, acceptable owing to short tool length and item heterogeneity. Kappa coefficients indicated 0.459 to 0.875 agreement between the STELD-T and the REELS indicated satisfactory criterion validity. After calculating the percentage of babies with a “refer” result as well as Kappa statistics with three different pass-refer criteria, a pass-refer criterion of 75% seemed to be appropriate for screening. The STELD seems to be a reliable and valid tool to screen language development in babies from 6 months to 18 months of age in urban areas of Maharashtra. Items representing a range of language skills including pragmatics make it a unique tool.","PeriodicalId":46920,"journal":{"name":"Language Acquisition","volume":"30 1","pages":"29 - 49"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a screening tool to identify babies at risk of language delay in India: A preliminary study\",\"authors\":\"Siddhi Pathak, Pallavi Sovani-Kelkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10489223.2022.2078212\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Early identification of language delay is important as it has a serious impact on a child’s life in terms of educational, social, and emotional development. Among the early language screening tools, there are some parent-administered tools; however, they are not culturally appropriate or freely available. This article documents the development and preliminary validation of a quick and easy-to-administer language screening tool for babies from 6 to 18 months of age. Parents of 100 babies ranging in age from 6 to 21 months were included in the study. The babies were classified into five screening levels according to their age. The items of a Screening Test of Early Language Development-Test version (STELD-T) were created and validated through expert opinion. The STELD-T was administered along with the Receptive Expressive Emergent Language Scale (REELS). Internal consistency using the Kuder-Richardson Formula-20 ranged from 0.457 to 0.853 across the five levels, acceptable owing to short tool length and item heterogeneity. Kappa coefficients indicated 0.459 to 0.875 agreement between the STELD-T and the REELS indicated satisfactory criterion validity. After calculating the percentage of babies with a “refer” result as well as Kappa statistics with three different pass-refer criteria, a pass-refer criterion of 75% seemed to be appropriate for screening. The STELD seems to be a reliable and valid tool to screen language development in babies from 6 months to 18 months of age in urban areas of Maharashtra. Items representing a range of language skills including pragmatics make it a unique tool.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Acquisition\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"29 - 49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Acquisition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2022.2078212\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2022.2078212","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

早期发现语言迟缓非常重要,因为它会严重影响儿童的教育、社会和情感发展。在早期语言筛选工具中,有一些由家长管理的工具;然而,它们在文化上并不合适,也不是免费提供的。本文记录了一种针对6 - 18个月婴儿的快速且易于管理的语言筛查工具的开发和初步验证。100名婴儿的父母参与了这项研究,他们的年龄从6个月到21个月不等。这些婴儿根据他们的年龄被分为五个筛查级别。编制早期语言发展筛查测试(stld - t)项目,并通过专家意见进行验证。STELD-T与接受性表达性突发语言量表(REELS)一起进行。使用库德-理查德森公式-20的内部一致性在五个水平上的范围从0.457到0.853,由于工具长度短和项目异质性,可以接受。Kappa系数显示,STELD-T与REELS之间的一致性为0.459 ~ 0.875,表明标准效度满意。在计算了具有“推荐”结果的婴儿的百分比以及Kappa统计数据与三种不同的“推荐及格”标准之后,75%的推荐及格标准似乎是合适的筛选标准。在马哈拉施特拉邦的城市地区,STELD似乎是一种可靠而有效的工具,用于筛选6个月至18个月大的婴儿的语言发展。代表一系列语言技能的项目,包括语用学,使它成为一个独特的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Development of a screening tool to identify babies at risk of language delay in India: A preliminary study
ABSTRACT Early identification of language delay is important as it has a serious impact on a child’s life in terms of educational, social, and emotional development. Among the early language screening tools, there are some parent-administered tools; however, they are not culturally appropriate or freely available. This article documents the development and preliminary validation of a quick and easy-to-administer language screening tool for babies from 6 to 18 months of age. Parents of 100 babies ranging in age from 6 to 21 months were included in the study. The babies were classified into five screening levels according to their age. The items of a Screening Test of Early Language Development-Test version (STELD-T) were created and validated through expert opinion. The STELD-T was administered along with the Receptive Expressive Emergent Language Scale (REELS). Internal consistency using the Kuder-Richardson Formula-20 ranged from 0.457 to 0.853 across the five levels, acceptable owing to short tool length and item heterogeneity. Kappa coefficients indicated 0.459 to 0.875 agreement between the STELD-T and the REELS indicated satisfactory criterion validity. After calculating the percentage of babies with a “refer” result as well as Kappa statistics with three different pass-refer criteria, a pass-refer criterion of 75% seemed to be appropriate for screening. The STELD seems to be a reliable and valid tool to screen language development in babies from 6 months to 18 months of age in urban areas of Maharashtra. Items representing a range of language skills including pragmatics make it a unique tool.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The research published in Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics makes a clear contribution to linguistic theory by increasing our understanding of how language is acquired. The journal focuses on the acquisition of syntax, semantics, phonology, and morphology, and considers theoretical, experimental, and computational perspectives. Coverage includes solutions to the logical problem of language acquisition, as it arises for particular grammatical proposals; discussion of acquisition data relevant to current linguistic questions; and perspectives derived from theory-driven studies of second language acquisition, language-impaired speakers, and other domains of cognition.
期刊最新文献
Wh-word acquisition in Czech: Exploring the growing trees hypothesis Why second-language speakers sometimes, but not always, derive scalar inferences like first-language speakers: Effects of task demands Subject position in Greek and Spanish monolingual and bilingual production: Exploring the influence of verb type and definiteness Mandarin non-interrogative wh-words distinguished between children with Developmental Language Disorder and Language-Impaired autistic children Children’s early negative auxiliaries are true auxiliaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1