{"title":"反被动语的来世","authors":"B. Comrie","doi":"10.29162/jez.2021.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Three\nexamples are presented of reanalyses of antipassives as or in the direction\nof ordinary transitive constructions, from Tsez, Chukchi, and Mayan\nlanguages. In all cases, an antipassive construction remains in the language\nor language family concerned, thus presenting empirical evidence of\nreanalysis to parallel earlier hypothesized reconstructions of antipassives\nto explain synchronic idiosyncrasies","PeriodicalId":41610,"journal":{"name":"Jezikoslovlje","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The\\nafterlife of the antipassive\",\"authors\":\"B. Comrie\",\"doi\":\"10.29162/jez.2021.7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Three\\nexamples are presented of reanalyses of antipassives as or in the direction\\nof ordinary transitive constructions, from Tsez, Chukchi, and Mayan\\nlanguages. In all cases, an antipassive construction remains in the language\\nor language family concerned, thus presenting empirical evidence of\\nreanalysis to parallel earlier hypothesized reconstructions of antipassives\\nto explain synchronic idiosyncrasies\",\"PeriodicalId\":41610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jezikoslovlje\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jezikoslovlje\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2021.7\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jezikoslovlje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29162/jez.2021.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Three
examples are presented of reanalyses of antipassives as or in the direction
of ordinary transitive constructions, from Tsez, Chukchi, and Mayan
languages. In all cases, an antipassive construction remains in the language
or language family concerned, thus presenting empirical evidence of
reanalysis to parallel earlier hypothesized reconstructions of antipassives
to explain synchronic idiosyncrasies