获得附属控制的外在性

IF 1.3 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Acquisition Pub Date : 2021-12-10 DOI:10.1080/10489223.2021.1971231
J. Gerard
{"title":"获得附属控制的外在性","authors":"J. Gerard","doi":"10.1080/10489223.2021.1971231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Previous research on 4–6-year-olds’ interpretations of adjunct control has observed non-adult-like behavior for sentences like John called Mary before running to the store. Several studies have aimed to identify a grammatical source of children’s errors. This study tests the predictions of grammatical and extragrammatical accounts by comparing children’s behavior on two truth value judgment tasks: a high-demand task, with a true/false judgment based on event ordering, and a low-demand task, with a true/false judgment based on the color of an item. Children’s behavior is more adultlike on the low-demand task, suggesting that children’s interpretations may be influenced by extragrammatical factors. Implications are discussed for children’s behavior in previous studies and for the role of the linguistic input.","PeriodicalId":46920,"journal":{"name":"Language Acquisition","volume":"29 1","pages":"107 - 134"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The extragrammaticality of the acquisition of adjunct control\",\"authors\":\"J. Gerard\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10489223.2021.1971231\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Previous research on 4–6-year-olds’ interpretations of adjunct control has observed non-adult-like behavior for sentences like John called Mary before running to the store. Several studies have aimed to identify a grammatical source of children’s errors. This study tests the predictions of grammatical and extragrammatical accounts by comparing children’s behavior on two truth value judgment tasks: a high-demand task, with a true/false judgment based on event ordering, and a low-demand task, with a true/false judgment based on the color of an item. Children’s behavior is more adultlike on the low-demand task, suggesting that children’s interpretations may be influenced by extragrammatical factors. Implications are discussed for children’s behavior in previous studies and for the role of the linguistic input.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46920,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Acquisition\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"107 - 134\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Acquisition\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2021.1971231\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Acquisition","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10489223.2021.1971231","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

摘要先前对4-6岁儿童对辅助控制的解释进行的研究观察到,像约翰在去商店前叫玛丽这样的句子有非成年人的行为。几项研究旨在找出儿童错误的语法来源。这项研究通过比较儿童在两项真值判断任务中的行为来测试语法和语法外账户的预测:一项是高需求任务,基于事件顺序的真/假判断;另一项是低需求任务,根据项目颜色的真/错判断。在低要求任务中,儿童的行为更像成年人,这表明儿童的解释可能受到语法外因素的影响。在先前的研究中讨论了对儿童行为的影响以及语言输入的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The extragrammaticality of the acquisition of adjunct control
ABSTRACT Previous research on 4–6-year-olds’ interpretations of adjunct control has observed non-adult-like behavior for sentences like John called Mary before running to the store. Several studies have aimed to identify a grammatical source of children’s errors. This study tests the predictions of grammatical and extragrammatical accounts by comparing children’s behavior on two truth value judgment tasks: a high-demand task, with a true/false judgment based on event ordering, and a low-demand task, with a true/false judgment based on the color of an item. Children’s behavior is more adultlike on the low-demand task, suggesting that children’s interpretations may be influenced by extragrammatical factors. Implications are discussed for children’s behavior in previous studies and for the role of the linguistic input.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: The research published in Language Acquisition: A Journal of Developmental Linguistics makes a clear contribution to linguistic theory by increasing our understanding of how language is acquired. The journal focuses on the acquisition of syntax, semantics, phonology, and morphology, and considers theoretical, experimental, and computational perspectives. Coverage includes solutions to the logical problem of language acquisition, as it arises for particular grammatical proposals; discussion of acquisition data relevant to current linguistic questions; and perspectives derived from theory-driven studies of second language acquisition, language-impaired speakers, and other domains of cognition.
期刊最新文献
Wh-word acquisition in Czech: Exploring the growing trees hypothesis Why second-language speakers sometimes, but not always, derive scalar inferences like first-language speakers: Effects of task demands Subject position in Greek and Spanish monolingual and bilingual production: Exploring the influence of verb type and definiteness Mandarin non-interrogative wh-words distinguished between children with Developmental Language Disorder and Language-Impaired autistic children Children’s early negative auxiliaries are true auxiliaries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1