英语写作课堂元认知策略教学的建议模式

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Reading & Writing Quarterly Pub Date : 2021-08-04 DOI:10.1080/10573569.2021.1954569
Mona J. Alfaifi
{"title":"英语写作课堂元认知策略教学的建议模式","authors":"Mona J. Alfaifi","doi":"10.1080/10573569.2021.1954569","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since its first appearance in the 1970s, the concept of ‘metacognition’ has received much scholarly attention. This study aims to examine metacognition as a process related to second language (L2) writing, and presents an attempt to teach metacognitive strategies to students to understand their effectiveness in developing writing skill. A blended learning technique has been adopted as a method through which to deliver instruction, as its nature allows learners to become engaged in the learning process which is essential in developing metacognition. The participants were 50 students studying English as a foreign language and they were divided into two groups: the experimental group received metacognitive instruction through blended learning; and the control group underwent traditional writing instruction. The instruments employed included a writing test, a questionnaire with self-report statements and an open-ended question (reflection). The findings showed an improvement in experimental students’ post-writing test and a general significant difference between them and the control group. Also, the students’ views about metacognitive instruction through blended learning were positive in general; hence, the instructional model presented to the students can be applied in L2 writing classrooms to develop students’ outcomes. Generally, metacognitive instruction through blended learning is beneficial in L2 classrooms.","PeriodicalId":51619,"journal":{"name":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","volume":"38 1","pages":"323 - 339"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10573569.2021.1954569","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Suggested Model for Metacognitive Strategy Instruction in EFL Writing Classrooms\",\"authors\":\"Mona J. Alfaifi\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10573569.2021.1954569\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Since its first appearance in the 1970s, the concept of ‘metacognition’ has received much scholarly attention. This study aims to examine metacognition as a process related to second language (L2) writing, and presents an attempt to teach metacognitive strategies to students to understand their effectiveness in developing writing skill. A blended learning technique has been adopted as a method through which to deliver instruction, as its nature allows learners to become engaged in the learning process which is essential in developing metacognition. The participants were 50 students studying English as a foreign language and they were divided into two groups: the experimental group received metacognitive instruction through blended learning; and the control group underwent traditional writing instruction. The instruments employed included a writing test, a questionnaire with self-report statements and an open-ended question (reflection). The findings showed an improvement in experimental students’ post-writing test and a general significant difference between them and the control group. Also, the students’ views about metacognitive instruction through blended learning were positive in general; hence, the instructional model presented to the students can be applied in L2 writing classrooms to develop students’ outcomes. Generally, metacognitive instruction through blended learning is beneficial in L2 classrooms.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51619,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reading & Writing Quarterly\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"323 - 339\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10573569.2021.1954569\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reading & Writing Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1954569\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reading & Writing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2021.1954569","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

自20世纪70年代首次出现以来,“元认知”概念受到了学术界的广泛关注。本研究旨在探讨元认知作为与第二语言写作相关的一个过程,并尝试向学生传授元认知策略,以了解其在培养写作技能方面的有效性。混合式学习技术已被采用作为一种教学方法,因为它的性质允许学习者参与学习过程,这对发展元认知至关重要。参与者为50名以英语为外语的学生,他们被分为两组:实验组通过混合学习接受元认知指导;对照组接受传统的写作指导。使用的工具包括一个写作测试,一个带有自我报告陈述的问卷和一个开放式问题(反思)。研究结果显示,实验组学生的写作后测试有所改善,与对照组相比有显著差异。此外,学生对混合学习元认知教学的看法总体上是积极的;因此,向学生展示的教学模式可以应用于第二语言写作课堂,以发展学生的成果。一般来说,通过混合学习的元认知教学在第二语言课堂中是有益的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Suggested Model for Metacognitive Strategy Instruction in EFL Writing Classrooms
Abstract Since its first appearance in the 1970s, the concept of ‘metacognition’ has received much scholarly attention. This study aims to examine metacognition as a process related to second language (L2) writing, and presents an attempt to teach metacognitive strategies to students to understand their effectiveness in developing writing skill. A blended learning technique has been adopted as a method through which to deliver instruction, as its nature allows learners to become engaged in the learning process which is essential in developing metacognition. The participants were 50 students studying English as a foreign language and they were divided into two groups: the experimental group received metacognitive instruction through blended learning; and the control group underwent traditional writing instruction. The instruments employed included a writing test, a questionnaire with self-report statements and an open-ended question (reflection). The findings showed an improvement in experimental students’ post-writing test and a general significant difference between them and the control group. Also, the students’ views about metacognitive instruction through blended learning were positive in general; hence, the instructional model presented to the students can be applied in L2 writing classrooms to develop students’ outcomes. Generally, metacognitive instruction through blended learning is beneficial in L2 classrooms.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Argumentative Writing for Students With Disabilities in Inclusive Science Classes: A Pilot Study Online Intervention to Prevent Summer Learning Loss For Struggling First Grade Writers Can Artificial Intelligence Identify Reading Fluency and Level? Comparison of Human and Machine Performance Exploring Relations between Teachers’ Language- and Code-Based Writing Supports to Early Literacy and Vocabulary Learning in Children with Language Vulnerabilities The Technical Adequacy of Coding Procedures for Retell Measures in Elementary School Students with Dyslexia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1