重新定义研究人类行为的明确和间接评价的态度

IF 0.6 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Functions of Language Pub Date : 2022-03-04 DOI:10.1075/fol.21022.vil
Sara Vilar Lluch
{"title":"重新定义研究人类行为的明确和间接评价的态度","authors":"Sara Vilar Lluch","doi":"10.1075/fol.21022.vil","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article considers the application of the Attitude framework (Martin &\n White 2005) to study the evaluation of human behaviour. The distinction between inscribed (explicit) and invoked\n (indirect) attitude is re-examined and systematised to better operationalise the analysis of the evaluation of behaviour. General\n linguistic evaluation triggers are identified for inscribed and invoked evaluations, and the annotation scheme is applied in a\n corpus of texts from different registers (a psychiatric manual, educational guidelines and informal online exchanges) concerned\n with ADHD. Indirect evaluations of behaviour are described as attitudinal inferences derived from (i) the behaviours of the\n individuals, (ii) the behavioural outcomes, (iii) the impact that the behaviour or its outcomes have on third parties and the\n actions that the latter may perform as a result. It is proposed that indirect evaluations of people’s behaviour are metonymically\n inferred through an effect→cause relation drawn across the different parts of an action scenario. The conceptual metonymy\n explains the directionality observed in attitude analyses (Appreciation attitude type may stand as tokens of Judgment), and it\n shows the impossibility of evaluating performances without indirectly appraising the human behaver.","PeriodicalId":44232,"journal":{"name":"Functions of Language","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Redefining attitude for studying explicit and indirect evaluations of human behaviour\",\"authors\":\"Sara Vilar Lluch\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/fol.21022.vil\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article considers the application of the Attitude framework (Martin &\\n White 2005) to study the evaluation of human behaviour. The distinction between inscribed (explicit) and invoked\\n (indirect) attitude is re-examined and systematised to better operationalise the analysis of the evaluation of behaviour. General\\n linguistic evaluation triggers are identified for inscribed and invoked evaluations, and the annotation scheme is applied in a\\n corpus of texts from different registers (a psychiatric manual, educational guidelines and informal online exchanges) concerned\\n with ADHD. Indirect evaluations of behaviour are described as attitudinal inferences derived from (i) the behaviours of the\\n individuals, (ii) the behavioural outcomes, (iii) the impact that the behaviour or its outcomes have on third parties and the\\n actions that the latter may perform as a result. It is proposed that indirect evaluations of people’s behaviour are metonymically\\n inferred through an effect→cause relation drawn across the different parts of an action scenario. The conceptual metonymy\\n explains the directionality observed in attitude analyses (Appreciation attitude type may stand as tokens of Judgment), and it\\n shows the impossibility of evaluating performances without indirectly appraising the human behaver.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Functions of Language\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Functions of Language\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21022.vil\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Functions of Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/fol.21022.vil","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文考虑应用态度框架(Martin & White 2005)来研究人类行为的评价。重新审视和系统化了固有(明确)和被调用(间接)态度之间的区别,以便更好地实施对行为评估的分析。一般的语言评估触发器被确定为铭刻和调用评估,并且注释方案应用于来自不同注册(精神病学手册,教育指南和非正式在线交流)的关于ADHD的文本语料库。行为的间接评价被描述为从(i)个人的行为,(ii)行为结果,(iii)行为或其结果对第三方的影响以及后者可能采取的行动中得出的态度推断。有人提出,对人们行为的间接评价是通过在行动场景的不同部分中绘制的因果关系来转喻地推断出来的。概念转喻解释了态度分析中观察到的方向性(欣赏态度类型可以作为判断的标志),它表明不间接评价人类行为就不可能评价绩效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Redefining attitude for studying explicit and indirect evaluations of human behaviour
This article considers the application of the Attitude framework (Martin & White 2005) to study the evaluation of human behaviour. The distinction between inscribed (explicit) and invoked (indirect) attitude is re-examined and systematised to better operationalise the analysis of the evaluation of behaviour. General linguistic evaluation triggers are identified for inscribed and invoked evaluations, and the annotation scheme is applied in a corpus of texts from different registers (a psychiatric manual, educational guidelines and informal online exchanges) concerned with ADHD. Indirect evaluations of behaviour are described as attitudinal inferences derived from (i) the behaviours of the individuals, (ii) the behavioural outcomes, (iii) the impact that the behaviour or its outcomes have on third parties and the actions that the latter may perform as a result. It is proposed that indirect evaluations of people’s behaviour are metonymically inferred through an effect→cause relation drawn across the different parts of an action scenario. The conceptual metonymy explains the directionality observed in attitude analyses (Appreciation attitude type may stand as tokens of Judgment), and it shows the impossibility of evaluating performances without indirectly appraising the human behaver.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Functions of Language is an international journal of linguistics which explores the functionalist perspective on the organisation and use of natural language. It encourages the interplay of theory and description, and provides space for the detailed analysis, qualitative or quantitative, of linguistic data from a broad range of languages. Its scope is broad, covering such matters as prosodic phenomena in phonology, the clause in its communicative context, and regularities of pragmatics, conversation and discourse, as well as the interaction between the various levels of analysis. The overall purpose is to contribute to our understanding of how the use of languages in speech and writing has impacted, and continues to impact, upon the structure of those languages.
期刊最新文献
The functions of evidentiality Review of Yus (2023): Pragmatics of internet humour Definite-like meaning of bare classifiers in Nung Cardinal direction judgment based on the integration of spatial reference frames in different languages Review of Kim, Martin, Shin & Choi (2023): Korean grammar: A systemic functional approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1