教学分组理论:优化课堂与排名学生的安置

Q4 Social Sciences Educational Practice & Theory Pub Date : 2022-07-01 DOI:10.7459/ept/44.1.02
Peter D. Wiens, Christine Zizzi, C. Heatwole
{"title":"教学分组理论:优化课堂与排名学生的安置","authors":"Peter D. Wiens, Christine Zizzi, C. Heatwole","doi":"10.7459/ept/44.1.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two common approaches to grouping students include an approach where students are grouped based on their aptitude and a cross-sectional approach where equal groups are formed and comprised of students of varied aptitudes. Instructional Grouping Theory is the study of how selection strategies\n impact the learning of group members. Using a non-biased, mathematically centric analysis, we found that a liked-skilled tiered grouping strategy is preferable to a cross-sectional grouping strategy when the goal is to facilitate the learning of all students. In addition, we found that a higher\n teacher-to-student ratio provides further benefit when analyzing the potential for facilitated learning.","PeriodicalId":35223,"journal":{"name":"Educational Practice & Theory","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Instructional Grouping Theory: Optimizing Classrooms and the Placement of Ranked Students\",\"authors\":\"Peter D. Wiens, Christine Zizzi, C. Heatwole\",\"doi\":\"10.7459/ept/44.1.02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two common approaches to grouping students include an approach where students are grouped based on their aptitude and a cross-sectional approach where equal groups are formed and comprised of students of varied aptitudes. Instructional Grouping Theory is the study of how selection strategies\\n impact the learning of group members. Using a non-biased, mathematically centric analysis, we found that a liked-skilled tiered grouping strategy is preferable to a cross-sectional grouping strategy when the goal is to facilitate the learning of all students. In addition, we found that a higher\\n teacher-to-student ratio provides further benefit when analyzing the potential for facilitated learning.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35223,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Educational Practice & Theory\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Educational Practice & Theory\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/44.1.02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Practice & Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7459/ept/44.1.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对学生进行分组的两种常见方法包括:一种方法是根据学生的能力进行分组,另一种方法是由不同能力的学生组成平等的小组。教学分组理论是研究选择策略如何影响小组成员的学习。使用无偏见的,以数学为中心的分析,我们发现,当目标是促进所有学生的学习时,相似技能的分层分组策略比横截面分组策略更可取。此外,我们发现,在分析促进学习的潜力时,更高的师生比例提供了进一步的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Instructional Grouping Theory: Optimizing Classrooms and the Placement of Ranked Students
Two common approaches to grouping students include an approach where students are grouped based on their aptitude and a cross-sectional approach where equal groups are formed and comprised of students of varied aptitudes. Instructional Grouping Theory is the study of how selection strategies impact the learning of group members. Using a non-biased, mathematically centric analysis, we found that a liked-skilled tiered grouping strategy is preferable to a cross-sectional grouping strategy when the goal is to facilitate the learning of all students. In addition, we found that a higher teacher-to-student ratio provides further benefit when analyzing the potential for facilitated learning.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Educational Practice & Theory
Educational Practice & Theory Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Educational Practice and Theory in its 40th year of publication continues as an important independent forum for original ideas in education research relevant to aspects of education including K-12 schools, education reforms, teaching methods and educational leadership. Educational Practice and Theory is: -a refereed journal with a distinguished panel of consulting editors; -comparative in focus; -innovative, path-finding and provocative; -diverse with reports on a wide range of countries and themes, and -applied and theoretical.
期刊最新文献
Teachers’ Beliefs About Grading, Grades, and Student Classroom Conduct Decision-Making Instruction: Rural Teachers’ Challenges and Perceptions of Robert Stahl’s Decision-Making Materials in the Social Studies Classroom Humor in Education: Exploring Its Complexities and Its Possibilities Notes and Comments Teachers as a Source of Support: Perceptions of Parents of Children With ADHD During COVID-19 Distance Learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1