无法获得和污名化:LGBTQ+青年对服务和性暴力的看法

IF 2.2 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Journal of LGBT Youth Pub Date : 2022-10-20 DOI:10.1080/19361653.2022.2134253
Sophie Jones, T. Patel
{"title":"无法获得和污名化:LGBTQ+青年对服务和性暴力的看法","authors":"Sophie Jones, T. Patel","doi":"10.1080/19361653.2022.2134253","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ+) young people are subject to high rates of sexual violence globally, significantly impacting their lives and psychological wellbeing. However, service use for sexual violence support is low for LGBTQ+ groups and there is no current research exploring LGBTQ+ young peoples’ experiences and perspectives of support services in the UK. To understand service utilisation for LGBTQ+ young people who have experienced sexual violence, a mixed methods exploration of survey data (N = 36) and individual interviews (N = 7) was conducted with LGBTQ+ young people aged 16–25. Participants reported a high prevalence of multiple types of sexual violence (e.g., 86.11% subject to sexual assault) and low reporting to any service (30.56%). Content analysis identified interpersonal, service, and sociocultural factors that limit service utilisation and sexual violence reporting. Two themes were identified through thematic analysis: ‘safety and acceptance’ which discussed participants’ positive experiences of services, and the theme ‘services as hard to reach’ explored how discrimination, heteronormativity, and victim-blaming impacted service accessibility. Implications for best practice for services supporting LGBTQ+ young people subject to sexual violence are discussed and a model is presented to address service utilisation.","PeriodicalId":46767,"journal":{"name":"Journal of LGBT Youth","volume":"20 1","pages":"632 - 657"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inaccessible and stigmatizing: LGBTQ+ youth perspectives of services and sexual violence\",\"authors\":\"Sophie Jones, T. Patel\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19361653.2022.2134253\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ+) young people are subject to high rates of sexual violence globally, significantly impacting their lives and psychological wellbeing. However, service use for sexual violence support is low for LGBTQ+ groups and there is no current research exploring LGBTQ+ young peoples’ experiences and perspectives of support services in the UK. To understand service utilisation for LGBTQ+ young people who have experienced sexual violence, a mixed methods exploration of survey data (N = 36) and individual interviews (N = 7) was conducted with LGBTQ+ young people aged 16–25. Participants reported a high prevalence of multiple types of sexual violence (e.g., 86.11% subject to sexual assault) and low reporting to any service (30.56%). Content analysis identified interpersonal, service, and sociocultural factors that limit service utilisation and sexual violence reporting. Two themes were identified through thematic analysis: ‘safety and acceptance’ which discussed participants’ positive experiences of services, and the theme ‘services as hard to reach’ explored how discrimination, heteronormativity, and victim-blaming impacted service accessibility. Implications for best practice for services supporting LGBTQ+ young people subject to sexual violence are discussed and a model is presented to address service utilisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46767,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of LGBT Youth\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"632 - 657\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of LGBT Youth\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2022.2134253\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of LGBT Youth","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19361653.2022.2134253","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

全球范围内,女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、跨性别、酷儿和质疑(LGBTQ+)年轻人是性暴力的高发群体,这对他们的生活和心理健康产生了重大影响。然而,LGBTQ+群体对性暴力支持的服务使用率很低,目前也没有关于英国LGBTQ+年轻人对支持服务的经历和观点的研究。为了了解遭受过性暴力的LGBTQ+年轻人对服务的利用情况,对16-25岁的LGBTQ+年轻人进行了调查数据(N = 36)和个人访谈(N = 7)的混合方法探索。参与者报告了多种类型的性暴力的高患病率(例如,86.11%的人遭受过性侵犯),而向任何服务机构报告的患病率较低(30.56%)。内容分析确定了限制服务利用和性暴力报告的人际、服务和社会文化因素。通过专题分析确定了两个主题:“安全和接受”,讨论了参与者对服务的积极体验,“难以获得的服务”,探讨了歧视、异性规范和受害者指责如何影响服务的可及性。讨论了支持遭受性暴力的LGBTQ+年轻人的服务最佳实践的影响,并提出了解决服务利用的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Inaccessible and stigmatizing: LGBTQ+ youth perspectives of services and sexual violence
Abstract Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and questioning (LGBTQ+) young people are subject to high rates of sexual violence globally, significantly impacting their lives and psychological wellbeing. However, service use for sexual violence support is low for LGBTQ+ groups and there is no current research exploring LGBTQ+ young peoples’ experiences and perspectives of support services in the UK. To understand service utilisation for LGBTQ+ young people who have experienced sexual violence, a mixed methods exploration of survey data (N = 36) and individual interviews (N = 7) was conducted with LGBTQ+ young people aged 16–25. Participants reported a high prevalence of multiple types of sexual violence (e.g., 86.11% subject to sexual assault) and low reporting to any service (30.56%). Content analysis identified interpersonal, service, and sociocultural factors that limit service utilisation and sexual violence reporting. Two themes were identified through thematic analysis: ‘safety and acceptance’ which discussed participants’ positive experiences of services, and the theme ‘services as hard to reach’ explored how discrimination, heteronormativity, and victim-blaming impacted service accessibility. Implications for best practice for services supporting LGBTQ+ young people subject to sexual violence are discussed and a model is presented to address service utilisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of LGBT Youth
Journal of LGBT Youth SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
8.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of LGBT Youth is the interdisciplinary forum dedicated to improving the quality of life for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and questioning youth. This quarterly journal presents peer-reviewed scholarly articles, practitioner-based essays, policy analyses, and revealing narratives from young people. This invaluable resource is committed to advancing knowledge about, and support of, LGBT youth. The wide-ranging topics include formal and non-formal education; family; peer culture; the media, arts, and entertainment industry; religious institutions and youth organizations; health care; and the workplace.
期刊最新文献
Tuned In! An affirmative mindfulness intervention for sexual and gender diverse young people Mental health and body image among SGM youth engaged with a digital eating disorder intervention Queer joy-centered sexuality education: offering a novel framework for gender-based violence prevention Understanding school staff responses to LGBTQ+ discrimination in UK secondary schools Factor structure of the Klein Sexual Orientation Grid among Latina/o/x Adolescents
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1