{"title":"书写为生物识别:以图形学和击键动力学为例","authors":"Akrish Adhikari","doi":"10.1353/con.2021.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:In this article, I provide a media archaeology of keystroke dynamics, a contemporary biometric that identifies users by their typing patterns. In particular, I compare keystroke dynamics to nineteenth-century graphology by way of Alphonse Bertillon, who argues that each person's handwriting is unique and thus suitable for identification purposes. Though the two biometrics analyze different kinds of writing, I argue that graphology and keystroke dynamics are in three ways permutations of each other: they both assume that writing patterns are \"natural\" and thus immutable; they understand writing as a discrete phenomenon and have similar technical structures; and they are classified as behavioral biometrics that are haunted by the physiological. I suggest that the social and technical similarities between the two biometrics stem from the fact that they both measure and analyze handwriting, a term that describes all kinds of writing involving the hand, including penmanship, typewriting, and keyboarding.","PeriodicalId":55630,"journal":{"name":"Configurations","volume":"29 1","pages":"155 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/con.2021.0010","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing as Biometric: The Case of Graphology and Keystroke Dynamics\",\"authors\":\"Akrish Adhikari\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/con.2021.0010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:In this article, I provide a media archaeology of keystroke dynamics, a contemporary biometric that identifies users by their typing patterns. In particular, I compare keystroke dynamics to nineteenth-century graphology by way of Alphonse Bertillon, who argues that each person's handwriting is unique and thus suitable for identification purposes. Though the two biometrics analyze different kinds of writing, I argue that graphology and keystroke dynamics are in three ways permutations of each other: they both assume that writing patterns are \\\"natural\\\" and thus immutable; they understand writing as a discrete phenomenon and have similar technical structures; and they are classified as behavioral biometrics that are haunted by the physiological. I suggest that the social and technical similarities between the two biometrics stem from the fact that they both measure and analyze handwriting, a term that describes all kinds of writing involving the hand, including penmanship, typewriting, and keyboarding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55630,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Configurations\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"155 - 178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/con.2021.0010\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Configurations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2021.0010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Configurations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/con.2021.0010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Writing as Biometric: The Case of Graphology and Keystroke Dynamics
ABSTRACT:In this article, I provide a media archaeology of keystroke dynamics, a contemporary biometric that identifies users by their typing patterns. In particular, I compare keystroke dynamics to nineteenth-century graphology by way of Alphonse Bertillon, who argues that each person's handwriting is unique and thus suitable for identification purposes. Though the two biometrics analyze different kinds of writing, I argue that graphology and keystroke dynamics are in three ways permutations of each other: they both assume that writing patterns are "natural" and thus immutable; they understand writing as a discrete phenomenon and have similar technical structures; and they are classified as behavioral biometrics that are haunted by the physiological. I suggest that the social and technical similarities between the two biometrics stem from the fact that they both measure and analyze handwriting, a term that describes all kinds of writing involving the hand, including penmanship, typewriting, and keyboarding.
ConfigurationsArts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
期刊介绍:
Configurations explores the relations of literature and the arts to the sciences and technology. Founded in 1993, the journal continues to set the stage for transdisciplinary research concerning the interplay between science, technology, and the arts. Configurations is the official publication of the Society for Literature, Science, and the Arts (SLSA).