小学退出计划的专业发展与差别化教学:资优教育个案研究

IF 1.2 Q3 EDUCATION, SPECIAL JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED Pub Date : 2019-09-27 DOI:10.1177/0162353219874418
Carla B. Brigandi, Cindy M. Gilson, Myriah Miller
{"title":"小学退出计划的专业发展与差别化教学:资优教育个案研究","authors":"Carla B. Brigandi, Cindy M. Gilson, Myriah Miller","doi":"10.1177/0162353219874418","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this longitudinal case study was to investigate the relationship between participation in professional development in Renzulli’s Enrichment Triad Model and one gifted education teacher’s knowledge and practice, with particular attention to differentiated instruction. Findings indicated that professional development increased the participating teacher’s knowledge of gifted education, her attitude toward change, and her repertoire of instructional strategies; however, it did not alter her underlying beliefs or subsequent approach to gifted education. Time span and provider support were noted as promoters of effective professional development. Conceptual blocks, teacher characteristics, and lack of time were identified as barriers that inhibited professional development–related change with regard to differentiated instruction for learners who have high academic ability.","PeriodicalId":51648,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0162353219874418","citationCount":"22","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Professional Development and Differentiated Instruction in an Elementary School Pullout Program: A Gifted Education Case Study\",\"authors\":\"Carla B. Brigandi, Cindy M. Gilson, Myriah Miller\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0162353219874418\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The purpose of this longitudinal case study was to investigate the relationship between participation in professional development in Renzulli’s Enrichment Triad Model and one gifted education teacher’s knowledge and practice, with particular attention to differentiated instruction. Findings indicated that professional development increased the participating teacher’s knowledge of gifted education, her attitude toward change, and her repertoire of instructional strategies; however, it did not alter her underlying beliefs or subsequent approach to gifted education. Time span and provider support were noted as promoters of effective professional development. Conceptual blocks, teacher characteristics, and lack of time were identified as barriers that inhibited professional development–related change with regard to differentiated instruction for learners who have high academic ability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51648,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/0162353219874418\",\"citationCount\":\"22\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219874418\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL FOR THE EDUCATION OF THE GIFTED","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353219874418","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

摘要

本纵向案例研究的目的是调查伦祖利丰富三位一体模式中参与专业发展与一名天才教育教师的知识和实践之间的关系,特别是对差异化教学的关注。研究结果表明,专业发展提高了参与教师对资优教育的认识、对变革的态度和教学策略;然而,这并没有改变她潜在的信念,也没有改变她后来接受天才教育的方式。时间跨度和提供者的支持被认为是有效的专业发展的推动者。概念块、教师特征和缺乏时间被认为是阻碍专业发展的障碍——对于具有高学术能力的学习者,在差异化教学方面,与专业发展相关的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Professional Development and Differentiated Instruction in an Elementary School Pullout Program: A Gifted Education Case Study
The purpose of this longitudinal case study was to investigate the relationship between participation in professional development in Renzulli’s Enrichment Triad Model and one gifted education teacher’s knowledge and practice, with particular attention to differentiated instruction. Findings indicated that professional development increased the participating teacher’s knowledge of gifted education, her attitude toward change, and her repertoire of instructional strategies; however, it did not alter her underlying beliefs or subsequent approach to gifted education. Time span and provider support were noted as promoters of effective professional development. Conceptual blocks, teacher characteristics, and lack of time were identified as barriers that inhibited professional development–related change with regard to differentiated instruction for learners who have high academic ability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Developing Hidden Talent: An Exploratory Study of Advanced Math Curriculum Implementation and Its Effects on Young Mathematically Promising English Learners Extending Research on Psychosocial Skills and Appropriate Instruction in Developing Talents Conducting Research on Psychosocial Skills Associated with Academic Talent Development Gifted Students’ Academic Motivation During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Qualitative Study in Croatia, Serbia, and Slovenia Young Adult Career Outcomes for Adolescents With ADHD, High Ability, or Twice-Exceptionality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1