{"title":"什么是Priestley-Taylor湿面蒸发参数?检验四个假设","authors":"R. Crago, Joszef Szilagyi, R. Qualls","doi":"10.5194/hess-27-3205-2023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. This study compares four different hypotheses regarding the nature\nof the Priestley–Taylor parameter α. They are as follows:\n α is a universal constant. The Bowen ratio (H/LE, where H is the sensible heat flux, and LE is\nthe latent heat flux) for equilibrium (i.e., saturated air column near the\nsurface) evaporation is a constant times the Bowen ratio at minimal\nadvection (Andreas et al., 2013). Minimal advection over a wet surface corresponds to a particular relative humidity value. α is a constant fraction of the difference from the minimum value of 1 to the maximum value of α proposed by Priestley and Taylor (1972).\nFormulas for α are developed for the last three hypotheses. Weather,\nradiation, and surface energy flux data from 171 FLUXNET eddy covariance\nstations were used. The condition LEref/LEp> 0.90 was\ntaken as the criterion for nearly saturated conditions (where LEref is\nthe reference, and LEp is the apparent potential evaporation rate from the equation by Penman, 1948). Daily and monthly average data from the sites were\nobtained. All formulations for α include one model parameter which\nis optimized such that the root mean square error of the target variable was\nminimized. For each model, separate optimizations were done for predictions\nof the target variables α, wet-surface evaporation (α\nmultiplied by equilibrium evaporation rate) and actual evaporation (the\nlatter using a highly successful version of the complementary relationship\nof evaporation). Overall, the second and fourth hypotheses received the best\nsupport from the data.\n","PeriodicalId":13143,"journal":{"name":"Hydrology and Earth System Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"What is the Priestley–Taylor wet-surface evaporation parameter? Testing four hypotheses\",\"authors\":\"R. Crago, Joszef Szilagyi, R. Qualls\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/hess-27-3205-2023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. This study compares four different hypotheses regarding the nature\\nof the Priestley–Taylor parameter α. They are as follows:\\n α is a universal constant. The Bowen ratio (H/LE, where H is the sensible heat flux, and LE is\\nthe latent heat flux) for equilibrium (i.e., saturated air column near the\\nsurface) evaporation is a constant times the Bowen ratio at minimal\\nadvection (Andreas et al., 2013). Minimal advection over a wet surface corresponds to a particular relative humidity value. α is a constant fraction of the difference from the minimum value of 1 to the maximum value of α proposed by Priestley and Taylor (1972).\\nFormulas for α are developed for the last three hypotheses. Weather,\\nradiation, and surface energy flux data from 171 FLUXNET eddy covariance\\nstations were used. The condition LEref/LEp> 0.90 was\\ntaken as the criterion for nearly saturated conditions (where LEref is\\nthe reference, and LEp is the apparent potential evaporation rate from the equation by Penman, 1948). Daily and monthly average data from the sites were\\nobtained. All formulations for α include one model parameter which\\nis optimized such that the root mean square error of the target variable was\\nminimized. For each model, separate optimizations were done for predictions\\nof the target variables α, wet-surface evaporation (α\\nmultiplied by equilibrium evaporation rate) and actual evaporation (the\\nlatter using a highly successful version of the complementary relationship\\nof evaporation). Overall, the second and fourth hypotheses received the best\\nsupport from the data.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":13143,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hydrology and Earth System Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hydrology and Earth System Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3205-2023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrology and Earth System Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-27-3205-2023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要本研究比较了关于Priestley-Taylor参数α性质的四种不同假设。它们是:α是一个普遍常数。平衡(即近地表饱和气柱)蒸发的波文比(H/LE,其中H为感热通量,LE为潜热通量)是最小平流时波文比的常数倍(Andreas et al., 2013)。湿面上的最小平流对应于一个特定的相对湿度值。α是由Priestley和Taylor(1972)提出的从1的最小值到最大值的差的常数分数。为后三个假设推导出了α的公式。使用了来自171个FLUXNET涡动相关变差的天气、辐射和地表能量通量数据。采用leef /LEp> 0.90作为近饱和条件的判据(leef为参考,LEp为Penman, 1948公式中的表观潜在蒸发速率)。从这些地点获得每日和每月的平均数据。α的所有公式都包含一个模型参数,该参数经过优化,使目标变量的均方根误差最小。对于每个模型,分别对目标变量α、湿面蒸发(α乘以平衡蒸发率)和实际蒸发(后者使用了一个非常成功的蒸发互补关系版本)的预测进行了优化。总体而言,第二和第四种假设得到了数据的最佳支持。
What is the Priestley–Taylor wet-surface evaporation parameter? Testing four hypotheses
Abstract. This study compares four different hypotheses regarding the nature
of the Priestley–Taylor parameter α. They are as follows:
α is a universal constant. The Bowen ratio (H/LE, where H is the sensible heat flux, and LE is
the latent heat flux) for equilibrium (i.e., saturated air column near the
surface) evaporation is a constant times the Bowen ratio at minimal
advection (Andreas et al., 2013). Minimal advection over a wet surface corresponds to a particular relative humidity value. α is a constant fraction of the difference from the minimum value of 1 to the maximum value of α proposed by Priestley and Taylor (1972).
Formulas for α are developed for the last three hypotheses. Weather,
radiation, and surface energy flux data from 171 FLUXNET eddy covariance
stations were used. The condition LEref/LEp> 0.90 was
taken as the criterion for nearly saturated conditions (where LEref is
the reference, and LEp is the apparent potential evaporation rate from the equation by Penman, 1948). Daily and monthly average data from the sites were
obtained. All formulations for α include one model parameter which
is optimized such that the root mean square error of the target variable was
minimized. For each model, separate optimizations were done for predictions
of the target variables α, wet-surface evaporation (α
multiplied by equilibrium evaporation rate) and actual evaporation (the
latter using a highly successful version of the complementary relationship
of evaporation). Overall, the second and fourth hypotheses received the best
support from the data.
期刊介绍:
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (HESS) is a not-for-profit international two-stage open-access journal for the publication of original research in hydrology. HESS encourages and supports fundamental and applied research that advances the understanding of hydrological systems, their role in providing water for ecosystems and society, and the role of the water cycle in the functioning of the Earth system. A multi-disciplinary approach is encouraged that broadens the hydrological perspective and the advancement of hydrological science through integration with other cognate sciences and cross-fertilization across disciplinary boundaries.