唐氏综合症儿童的适应行为:发育轨迹的横断面研究

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q1 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability Pub Date : 2021-09-26 DOI:10.3109/13668250.2021.1976008
Josefina Bunster, M. Tassé, Marcela Tenorio, Andrés Aparicio, P. Arango
{"title":"唐氏综合症儿童的适应行为:发育轨迹的横断面研究","authors":"Josefina Bunster, M. Tassé, Marcela Tenorio, Andrés Aparicio, P. Arango","doi":"10.3109/13668250.2021.1976008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Background Given the importance of adaptive behaviour (AB) for the identification of intellectual disability and the design of intervention plans for people with Down syndrome (DS), this cross-sectional study explored AB in infants with DS, compared to infants with typical development (TD). Method: we evaluated 60 infants (10–36 months) with ABAS-II (32 with DS, 28 with TD). Using the developmental trajectories method for data analysis, we compared AB between the two groups. Results We found significant differences between groups in most of the skills assessed, in favour of infants with TD. Three different patterns of trajectories were found for the AB and the relation between the groups: (1) no differences (Leisure and Self-Care Skills); (2) differences at the beginning of the trajectory and then a similar slope (Home Living, Self-Direction, Social and Motor Skills); and (3) a similar starting-point with differences in the trajectories (Communication, Community Use, Pre-Academic, and Health and Safety). Conclusions This empirical cross-sectional study contributes to the understanding of the development of AB in children with DS, showing both weak areas and skills that continue improving over time in these early years. Contributions and limitations of the study are discussed.","PeriodicalId":51466,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","volume":"47 1","pages":"276 - 286"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adaptive behaviours in children with Down syndrome: A cross-sectional study of developmental trajectories\",\"authors\":\"Josefina Bunster, M. Tassé, Marcela Tenorio, Andrés Aparicio, P. Arango\",\"doi\":\"10.3109/13668250.2021.1976008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Background Given the importance of adaptive behaviour (AB) for the identification of intellectual disability and the design of intervention plans for people with Down syndrome (DS), this cross-sectional study explored AB in infants with DS, compared to infants with typical development (TD). Method: we evaluated 60 infants (10–36 months) with ABAS-II (32 with DS, 28 with TD). Using the developmental trajectories method for data analysis, we compared AB between the two groups. Results We found significant differences between groups in most of the skills assessed, in favour of infants with TD. Three different patterns of trajectories were found for the AB and the relation between the groups: (1) no differences (Leisure and Self-Care Skills); (2) differences at the beginning of the trajectory and then a similar slope (Home Living, Self-Direction, Social and Motor Skills); and (3) a similar starting-point with differences in the trajectories (Communication, Community Use, Pre-Academic, and Health and Safety). Conclusions This empirical cross-sectional study contributes to the understanding of the development of AB in children with DS, showing both weak areas and skills that continue improving over time in these early years. Contributions and limitations of the study are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"276 - 286\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2021.1976008\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3109/13668250.2021.1976008","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景考虑到适应行为(AB)在识别唐氏综合症(DS)患者的智力残疾和设计干预计划中的重要性,本横断面研究探讨了唐氏综合症婴儿的AB,并与典型发育(TD)婴儿进行了比较。方法:对60例(10-36个月)ABAS-II患儿(32例DS, 28例TD)进行评估。采用发育轨迹法进行数据分析,比较两组的AB。结果我们发现各组之间在大多数技能评估方面存在显著差异,这有利于患有TD的婴儿。结果显示,两组学生的休闲技能和自理技能之间存在三种不同的发展轨迹:(1)无差异(休闲技能和自理技能);(2)轨迹开始时的差异,然后是相似的斜率(家庭生活、自我指导、社交和运动技能);(3)起点相似,但轨迹不同(通信、社区使用、学前教育和健康与安全)。本实证横断面研究有助于理解退行性椎体滑移儿童AB的发展,显示出这些早期的薄弱领域和技能随着时间的推移不断提高。讨论了本研究的贡献和局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Adaptive behaviours in children with Down syndrome: A cross-sectional study of developmental trajectories
ABSTRACT Background Given the importance of adaptive behaviour (AB) for the identification of intellectual disability and the design of intervention plans for people with Down syndrome (DS), this cross-sectional study explored AB in infants with DS, compared to infants with typical development (TD). Method: we evaluated 60 infants (10–36 months) with ABAS-II (32 with DS, 28 with TD). Using the developmental trajectories method for data analysis, we compared AB between the two groups. Results We found significant differences between groups in most of the skills assessed, in favour of infants with TD. Three different patterns of trajectories were found for the AB and the relation between the groups: (1) no differences (Leisure and Self-Care Skills); (2) differences at the beginning of the trajectory and then a similar slope (Home Living, Self-Direction, Social and Motor Skills); and (3) a similar starting-point with differences in the trajectories (Communication, Community Use, Pre-Academic, and Health and Safety). Conclusions This empirical cross-sectional study contributes to the understanding of the development of AB in children with DS, showing both weak areas and skills that continue improving over time in these early years. Contributions and limitations of the study are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.70%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Journal of Intellectual & Developmental Disability (formerly the Australia and New Zealand Journal of Developmental Disabilities) is the official journal of the Australasian Society for the Study of Intellectual Disability (ASSID). JIDD is an international, multidisciplinary journal in the field of intellectual and developmental disability. The journal publishes original qualitative and quantitative research papers, literature reviews, conceptual articles, brief reports, case reports, data briefs, and opinions and perspectives.
期刊最新文献
Family members use superficial justice information to evaluate performance of sheltered workshops: A warning about “cognitive shortcuts” The uniquely relational role of nurses during the closure of large residential institutions for people with intellectual disability in Australia: A qualitative study Relatives’ experiences of quality of healthcare services for adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities in Sweden Interdisciplinarity and self-injury: Toward an inclusive research and treatment paradigm Reducing the risks of maltreatment of older adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities: Development of a research-based intervention
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1