BPMN++支持在网络物理生产系统设计和运营中管理组织、多团队和系统工程方面

IF 1.8 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Design Science Pub Date : 2022-01-10 DOI:10.1017/dsj.2021.29
B. Vogel‐Heuser, J. A. Reif, Jan-H. Passoth, Christoph Huber, F. Brodbeck, Sabine Maasen, U. Lindemann, Dominik Hujo
{"title":"BPMN++支持在网络物理生产系统设计和运营中管理组织、多团队和系统工程方面","authors":"B. Vogel‐Heuser, J. A. Reif, Jan-H. Passoth, Christoph Huber, F. Brodbeck, Sabine Maasen, U. Lindemann, Dominik Hujo","doi":"10.1017/dsj.2021.29","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Interdisciplinary engineering of cyber physical production systems (CPPS) are often subject to delay, cost overrun and quality problems or may even fail due to the lack of efficient information exchange between multiple interdisciplinary teams working in complex networks within and across companies. We propose a direct integration of multiteam and organisational aspects into the graphical notation of the systems engineering workflow. BPMN++, with eight new notational elements and two subdiagrams, enables the modelling of the required cooperation aspects. BPMN++ provides an improved overview, uniform notation, more compact presentation and easier modifiability from an engineering point of view. We also included a first set of empirical studies and historical qualitative and quantitative data in addition to subjective expert-based ratings to increase validity. The use case introduced to explain the procedure and the notation is derived from surveys in plant manufacturing focussing on the start-up phase and decision support at site. This, in particular, is one of the most complex and critical phases with potentially high economic impact. For evaluation purposes, we compare two alternative solutions for a short-term management decision in the start-up phase of CPPS using the BPMN++ approach.","PeriodicalId":54146,"journal":{"name":"Design Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"BPMN++ to support managing organisational, multiteam and systems engineering aspects in cyber physical production systems design and operation\",\"authors\":\"B. Vogel‐Heuser, J. A. Reif, Jan-H. Passoth, Christoph Huber, F. Brodbeck, Sabine Maasen, U. Lindemann, Dominik Hujo\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/dsj.2021.29\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Interdisciplinary engineering of cyber physical production systems (CPPS) are often subject to delay, cost overrun and quality problems or may even fail due to the lack of efficient information exchange between multiple interdisciplinary teams working in complex networks within and across companies. We propose a direct integration of multiteam and organisational aspects into the graphical notation of the systems engineering workflow. BPMN++, with eight new notational elements and two subdiagrams, enables the modelling of the required cooperation aspects. BPMN++ provides an improved overview, uniform notation, more compact presentation and easier modifiability from an engineering point of view. We also included a first set of empirical studies and historical qualitative and quantitative data in addition to subjective expert-based ratings to increase validity. The use case introduced to explain the procedure and the notation is derived from surveys in plant manufacturing focussing on the start-up phase and decision support at site. This, in particular, is one of the most complex and critical phases with potentially high economic impact. For evaluation purposes, we compare two alternative solutions for a short-term management decision in the start-up phase of CPPS using the BPMN++ approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54146,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Design Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Design Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2021.29\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Design Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/dsj.2021.29","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要网络物理生产系统(CPPS)的跨学科工程经常会出现延迟、成本超支和质量问题,甚至可能因为在公司内部和跨公司的复杂网络中工作的多个跨学科团队之间缺乏有效的信息交换而失败。我们建议将多团队和组织方面直接集成到系统工程工作流的图形符号中。BPMN++具有八个新的符号元素和两个子图,能够对所需的合作方面进行建模。BPMN++从工程的角度提供了改进的概述、统一的表示法、更紧凑的表示和更容易的可修改性。除了基于主观专家的评分外,我们还包括了第一组实证研究和历史定性和定量数据,以提高有效性。用于解释程序和注释的用例来自工厂制造中的调查,重点是启动阶段和现场决策支持。特别是,这是最复杂和最关键的阶段之一,具有潜在的高经济影响。出于评估目的,我们使用BPMN++方法比较了CPPS启动阶段短期管理决策的两种替代解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
BPMN++ to support managing organisational, multiteam and systems engineering aspects in cyber physical production systems design and operation
Abstract Interdisciplinary engineering of cyber physical production systems (CPPS) are often subject to delay, cost overrun and quality problems or may even fail due to the lack of efficient information exchange between multiple interdisciplinary teams working in complex networks within and across companies. We propose a direct integration of multiteam and organisational aspects into the graphical notation of the systems engineering workflow. BPMN++, with eight new notational elements and two subdiagrams, enables the modelling of the required cooperation aspects. BPMN++ provides an improved overview, uniform notation, more compact presentation and easier modifiability from an engineering point of view. We also included a first set of empirical studies and historical qualitative and quantitative data in addition to subjective expert-based ratings to increase validity. The use case introduced to explain the procedure and the notation is derived from surveys in plant manufacturing focussing on the start-up phase and decision support at site. This, in particular, is one of the most complex and critical phases with potentially high economic impact. For evaluation purposes, we compare two alternative solutions for a short-term management decision in the start-up phase of CPPS using the BPMN++ approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Design Science
Design Science ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
12.50%
发文量
19
审稿时长
22 weeks
期刊最新文献
Design issues concerning circular economy assessment methods at the product level: a comparative analysis through a case study of a mobile tiny house Research through co-design Ilmenau’s contributions to Design Science Exploring the impact of design tool usage on design for additive manufacturing processes and outcomes Interesting and impressive: exploring design factors for product graphics interchange format to enhance engagement
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1