变脏变干净:性教育与专业知识问题

IF 1.6 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Curriculum Inquiry Pub Date : 2021-07-31 DOI:10.1080/03626784.2021.1947732
J. Gilbert
{"title":"变脏变干净:性教育与专业知识问题","authors":"J. Gilbert","doi":"10.1080/03626784.2021.1947732","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article recounts my experience serving as an expert witness at a Human Rights Tribunal. In 2018–2019, a grade six trans girl, known only as AB, sued the Ontario provincial government in Canada for revoking a progressive sex education curriculum that addressed gender and sexual identity. While working as an advocate for AB, I wrestled with my own relationship to expertise both within the university and beyond its walls. While describing the process of preparing and testifying before the Tribunal, I focus on two points of tension. First, I draw on Irvine’s (2014) study on “dirty work” to consider the ways sexuality and gender scholars clean up their research to remove the stigma of sex. To be a sexuality and gender expert requires that I negotiate my proximity to the uncertainties of sexuality—a process complicated for the queer researcher. Second, I consider how the curriculum becomes part of this clean-up effort. In controversies surrounding the sex education of children and youth, progressive advocates counter the moralistic and often religious rhetoric of conservative activists by sterilizing the sex education curriculum through discourses of health and well-being. While I recognize the power of this position, I raise questions about how this strategy neglects the ways youth make and remake the curriculum, exceeding the intentions of teachers, parents, and politicians.","PeriodicalId":47299,"journal":{"name":"Curriculum Inquiry","volume":"51 1","pages":"455 - 472"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03626784.2021.1947732","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Getting dirty and coming clean: Sex education and the problem of expertise\",\"authors\":\"J. Gilbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/03626784.2021.1947732\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This article recounts my experience serving as an expert witness at a Human Rights Tribunal. In 2018–2019, a grade six trans girl, known only as AB, sued the Ontario provincial government in Canada for revoking a progressive sex education curriculum that addressed gender and sexual identity. While working as an advocate for AB, I wrestled with my own relationship to expertise both within the university and beyond its walls. While describing the process of preparing and testifying before the Tribunal, I focus on two points of tension. First, I draw on Irvine’s (2014) study on “dirty work” to consider the ways sexuality and gender scholars clean up their research to remove the stigma of sex. To be a sexuality and gender expert requires that I negotiate my proximity to the uncertainties of sexuality—a process complicated for the queer researcher. Second, I consider how the curriculum becomes part of this clean-up effort. In controversies surrounding the sex education of children and youth, progressive advocates counter the moralistic and often religious rhetoric of conservative activists by sterilizing the sex education curriculum through discourses of health and well-being. While I recognize the power of this position, I raise questions about how this strategy neglects the ways youth make and remake the curriculum, exceeding the intentions of teachers, parents, and politicians.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Curriculum Inquiry\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"455 - 472\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03626784.2021.1947732\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Curriculum Inquiry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2021.1947732\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Curriculum Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03626784.2021.1947732","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本文叙述了我在一个人权法庭担任专家证人的经历。2018-2019年,一名名叫AB的六年级跨性别女孩起诉加拿大安大略省政府撤销了一项涉及性别和性身份的进步性教育课程。在担任AB的倡导者期间,我一直在努力解决自己与大学内外专业知识的关系。在描述准备工作和在法庭作证的过程时,我着重指出两个紧张点。首先,我借鉴了Irvine(2014)关于“肮脏工作”的研究,来思考性和性别学者如何清理他们的研究,以消除性的污名。要成为一名性和性别专家,我需要与性的不确定性进行协商——这对酷儿研究者来说是一个复杂的过程。其次,我考虑课程如何成为清理工作的一部分。在围绕儿童和青少年性教育的争议中,进步的倡导者通过健康和幸福的话语来消除性教育课程,以此来对抗保守活动家的道德主义和宗教言论。虽然我认识到这一立场的力量,但我提出的问题是,这种策略如何忽视了年轻人制定和重新制定课程的方式,超出了教师、家长和政治家的意图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Getting dirty and coming clean: Sex education and the problem of expertise
Abstract This article recounts my experience serving as an expert witness at a Human Rights Tribunal. In 2018–2019, a grade six trans girl, known only as AB, sued the Ontario provincial government in Canada for revoking a progressive sex education curriculum that addressed gender and sexual identity. While working as an advocate for AB, I wrestled with my own relationship to expertise both within the university and beyond its walls. While describing the process of preparing and testifying before the Tribunal, I focus on two points of tension. First, I draw on Irvine’s (2014) study on “dirty work” to consider the ways sexuality and gender scholars clean up their research to remove the stigma of sex. To be a sexuality and gender expert requires that I negotiate my proximity to the uncertainties of sexuality—a process complicated for the queer researcher. Second, I consider how the curriculum becomes part of this clean-up effort. In controversies surrounding the sex education of children and youth, progressive advocates counter the moralistic and often religious rhetoric of conservative activists by sterilizing the sex education curriculum through discourses of health and well-being. While I recognize the power of this position, I raise questions about how this strategy neglects the ways youth make and remake the curriculum, exceeding the intentions of teachers, parents, and politicians.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Curriculum Inquiry
Curriculum Inquiry EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
17.60%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Curriculum Inquiry is dedicated to the study of educational research, development, evaluation, and theory. This leading international journal brings together influential academics and researchers from a variety of disciplines around the world to provide expert commentary and lively debate. Articles explore important ideas, issues, trends, and problems in education, and each issue also includes provocative and critically analytical editorials covering topics such as curriculum development, educational policy, and teacher education.
期刊最新文献
Borderland teaching of Chinese American teachers with Mexican American students “Salt preserves”: A curriculum of salt in The Autobiography of Mary Prince Fragments of reaching home: Curriculum as embodied lived experiences in a transnational Indigenous educational journey (Re)charging Queer Indigenous zones: Pedagogical hub-making with the Land of the Spirit Waters Critically considering and conceptualizing social contexts as curriculum
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1