《参与性意识形态:从排斥到参与》,彼得·贝雷斯福德著

IF 2.3 2区 社会学 Q1 SOCIAL ISSUES Critical Social Policy Pub Date : 2022-09-07 DOI:10.1177/02610183221120547
Steve Rogowski
{"title":"《参与性意识形态:从排斥到参与》,彼得·贝雷斯福德著","authors":"Steve Rogowski","doi":"10.1177/02610183221120547","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As one might expect from Peter Beresford, this is an important book that explores the exclusionary nature of prevailing political ideologies and argues for participatory approaches. As the blurb states, it brings together theory, practice and the relationship between participation, political ideology and social welfare to offer a practical guide for change. I certainly recommend it. The preface highlights how Covid-19, Black Lives Matter and #MeToo movements and renewed action against climate change have led to grassroots pressure for global political and social change. This is opposed by market-driven neoliberalism and right-wing populism which highlights the gulf between dominant narrowly based political ideologies and popular demands for social justice, environmentalism and human rights. The book goes on to examine the exclusionary nature of prevailing political ideologies at a time of increased interest in grassroots citizen participation, instead arguing for more participatory approaches in public policy and practice. The text is divided into three parts which respectively focus on ideology, participation and challenging dominant ideologies through participatory action. Part 1 has three chapters examining, for example, political ideology, ideology’s relationship with individuals and the (lack of) participation by people in shaping ideology. There is also an interesting discussion on ‘our ideological inheritance’ including nationalism, colonialism and social liberalism, together with last century’s fascism and communism. Part 2 has two chapters focusing on reconnecting ideology and participation with a key question being can ideology be liberatory without participation? In answering this, Book Reviews","PeriodicalId":47685,"journal":{"name":"Critical Social Policy","volume":"42 1","pages":"740 - 742"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Book Review: Participatory Ideology: From Exclusion to Involvement by Peter Beresford\",\"authors\":\"Steve Rogowski\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/02610183221120547\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As one might expect from Peter Beresford, this is an important book that explores the exclusionary nature of prevailing political ideologies and argues for participatory approaches. As the blurb states, it brings together theory, practice and the relationship between participation, political ideology and social welfare to offer a practical guide for change. I certainly recommend it. The preface highlights how Covid-19, Black Lives Matter and #MeToo movements and renewed action against climate change have led to grassroots pressure for global political and social change. This is opposed by market-driven neoliberalism and right-wing populism which highlights the gulf between dominant narrowly based political ideologies and popular demands for social justice, environmentalism and human rights. The book goes on to examine the exclusionary nature of prevailing political ideologies at a time of increased interest in grassroots citizen participation, instead arguing for more participatory approaches in public policy and practice. The text is divided into three parts which respectively focus on ideology, participation and challenging dominant ideologies through participatory action. Part 1 has three chapters examining, for example, political ideology, ideology’s relationship with individuals and the (lack of) participation by people in shaping ideology. There is also an interesting discussion on ‘our ideological inheritance’ including nationalism, colonialism and social liberalism, together with last century’s fascism and communism. Part 2 has two chapters focusing on reconnecting ideology and participation with a key question being can ideology be liberatory without participation? In answering this, Book Reviews\",\"PeriodicalId\":47685,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical Social Policy\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"740 - 742\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical Social Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221120547\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL ISSUES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Social Policy","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183221120547","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL ISSUES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

正如人们对彼得·贝雷斯福德的期望,这是一本重要的书,探讨了主流政治意识形态的排斥性质,并主张采用参与式方法。正如广告所说,它将理论、实践以及参与、政治意识形态和社会福利之间的关系结合在一起,为变革提供了实用的指导。我当然建议这样做。序言强调了新冠肺炎、“黑人的命也是命”和“#我也是”运动以及应对气候变化的新行动如何导致基层对全球政治和社会变革的压力。这遭到了市场驱动的新自由主义和右翼民粹主义的反对,后者突显了占主导地位的狭隘政治意识形态与民众对社会正义、环保主义和人权的要求之间的鸿沟。这本书继续探讨了在人们对基层公民参与越来越感兴趣的时候,主流政治意识形态的排斥性质,而不是主张在公共政策和实践中采取更具参与性的方法。本文分为三个部分,分别关注意识形态、参与和通过参与行动挑战主流意识形态。第一部分共分三章,考察政治意识形态、意识形态与个人的关系以及人们(缺乏)参与塑造意识形态。还有一个关于“我们的意识形态遗产”的有趣讨论,包括民族主义、殖民主义和社会自由主义,以及上个世纪的法西斯主义和共产主义。第二部分分为两章,重点是重新连接意识形态和参与,一个关键问题是,没有参与,意识形态能解放吗?在回答这个问题时,书评
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Book Review: Participatory Ideology: From Exclusion to Involvement by Peter Beresford
As one might expect from Peter Beresford, this is an important book that explores the exclusionary nature of prevailing political ideologies and argues for participatory approaches. As the blurb states, it brings together theory, practice and the relationship between participation, political ideology and social welfare to offer a practical guide for change. I certainly recommend it. The preface highlights how Covid-19, Black Lives Matter and #MeToo movements and renewed action against climate change have led to grassroots pressure for global political and social change. This is opposed by market-driven neoliberalism and right-wing populism which highlights the gulf between dominant narrowly based political ideologies and popular demands for social justice, environmentalism and human rights. The book goes on to examine the exclusionary nature of prevailing political ideologies at a time of increased interest in grassroots citizen participation, instead arguing for more participatory approaches in public policy and practice. The text is divided into three parts which respectively focus on ideology, participation and challenging dominant ideologies through participatory action. Part 1 has three chapters examining, for example, political ideology, ideology’s relationship with individuals and the (lack of) participation by people in shaping ideology. There is also an interesting discussion on ‘our ideological inheritance’ including nationalism, colonialism and social liberalism, together with last century’s fascism and communism. Part 2 has two chapters focusing on reconnecting ideology and participation with a key question being can ideology be liberatory without participation? In answering this, Book Reviews
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
8.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Critical Social Policy provides a forum for advocacy, analysis and debate on social policy issues. We publish critical perspectives which: ·acknowledge and reflect upon differences in political, economic, social and cultural power and upon the diversity of cultures and movements shaping social policy; ·re-think conventional approaches to securing rights, meeting needs and challenging inequalities and injustices; ·include perspectives, analyses and concerns of people and groups whose voices are unheard or underrepresented in policy-making; ·reflect lived experiences of users of existing benefits and services;
期刊最新文献
Distanciation as a technology of control in the UK hostile environment. Pregnant racialised migrants and the ubiquitous border: The hostile environment as a technology of stratified reproduction. Bordering social reproduction: The welfare/immigration regimes of Quebec and Ontario in Canada Diminishing returns of growth? Economic performance, needs satisfaction and ecological impacts of OECD welfare states A cure-all for energy poverty? Thinking critically about energy advice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1