患者量身定制的方法提高术后恢复

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Visceral Medicine Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-13 DOI:10.1159/000526692
Steffen Seyfried, Florian Herrle, Patrick Téoule, Alexander Betzler, Christoph Reissfelder
{"title":"患者量身定制的方法提高术后恢复","authors":"Steffen Seyfried, Florian Herrle, Patrick Téoule, Alexander Betzler, Christoph Reissfelder","doi":"10.1159/000526692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) is increasingly finding its way into clinical practice. ERAS® protocols have not been universally adopted, and they have often been criticized for being difficult to implement. So, the question for more tailor-made approaches arises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search on March 16, 2022, using the following search string, which was modified to fit the input of each of the queried databases: (\"ERAS®\" or \"enhanced recovery after surgery\" or \"fast recovery\" or \"fast track\") and (\"tailored\" or \"individual\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite the massive increase in general hits on the subject, stratification according to phenotypic characteristics such as age or a classification according to disease patterns in the sense of specific guidelines is still fundamentally apparent. Evidence suggests that generic protocols can be followed by almost all patients. Prehabilitation, in particular, can be used as an adaptive tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ERAS® works only in the totality of its tools and can be followed by almost all patients. Prehabilitation is more adaptive and can also increase adherence to ERAS® protocols. A tailored program outside of disease-specific pathways does not seem to be useful.</p>","PeriodicalId":56003,"journal":{"name":"Visceral Medicine","volume":"38 1","pages":"322-327"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642544/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient-Tailored Approach for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Steffen Seyfried, Florian Herrle, Patrick Téoule, Alexander Betzler, Christoph Reissfelder\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000526692\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) is increasingly finding its way into clinical practice. ERAS® protocols have not been universally adopted, and they have often been criticized for being difficult to implement. So, the question for more tailor-made approaches arises.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a literature search on March 16, 2022, using the following search string, which was modified to fit the input of each of the queried databases: (\\\"ERAS®\\\" or \\\"enhanced recovery after surgery\\\" or \\\"fast recovery\\\" or \\\"fast track\\\") and (\\\"tailored\\\" or \\\"individual\\\").</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Despite the massive increase in general hits on the subject, stratification according to phenotypic characteristics such as age or a classification according to disease patterns in the sense of specific guidelines is still fundamentally apparent. Evidence suggests that generic protocols can be followed by almost all patients. Prehabilitation, in particular, can be used as an adaptive tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ERAS® works only in the totality of its tools and can be followed by almost all patients. Prehabilitation is more adaptive and can also increase adherence to ERAS® protocols. A tailored program outside of disease-specific pathways does not seem to be useful.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":56003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visceral Medicine\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"322-327\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10642544/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visceral Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526692\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/10/13 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visceral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000526692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:增强术后恢复(ERAS®)越来越多地进入临床实践。ERAS®协议尚未得到普遍采用,而且经常被批评难以实施。因此,出现了更为量身定制的方法的问题。方法:我们于2022年3月16日使用以下搜索字符串进行了文献搜索,并对其进行了修改,以适应每个查询数据库的输入:(“ERAS®”或“术后增强恢复”或“快速恢复”)和(“量身定制”或“个人”)。结果:尽管受试者的总体命中率大幅增加,但根据表型特征(如年龄)进行分层或根据特定指南意义上的疾病模式进行分类仍然从根本上是明显的。有证据表明,几乎所有患者都可以遵循通用方案。预适应训练尤其可以作为一种适应性工具。结论:ERAS®仅在其全部工具中有效,几乎所有患者都可以使用。预适应能力更强,也可以增加对ERAS®协议的遵守。在疾病特异性途径之外的量身定制的程序似乎没有用处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Patient-Tailored Approach for Enhanced Recovery after Surgery.

Background: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) is increasingly finding its way into clinical practice. ERAS® protocols have not been universally adopted, and they have often been criticized for being difficult to implement. So, the question for more tailor-made approaches arises.

Methods: We conducted a literature search on March 16, 2022, using the following search string, which was modified to fit the input of each of the queried databases: ("ERAS®" or "enhanced recovery after surgery" or "fast recovery" or "fast track") and ("tailored" or "individual").

Results: Despite the massive increase in general hits on the subject, stratification according to phenotypic characteristics such as age or a classification according to disease patterns in the sense of specific guidelines is still fundamentally apparent. Evidence suggests that generic protocols can be followed by almost all patients. Prehabilitation, in particular, can be used as an adaptive tool.

Conclusion: ERAS® works only in the totality of its tools and can be followed by almost all patients. Prehabilitation is more adaptive and can also increase adherence to ERAS® protocols. A tailored program outside of disease-specific pathways does not seem to be useful.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Visceral Medicine
Visceral Medicine Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: This interdisciplinary journal is unique in its field as it covers the principles of both gastrointestinal medicine and surgery required for treating abdominal diseases. In each issue invited reviews provide a comprehensive overview of one selected topic. Thus, a sound background of the state of the art in clinical practice and research is provided. A panel of specialists in gastroenterology, surgery, radiology, and pathology discusses different approaches to diagnosis and treatment of the topic covered in the respective issue. Original articles, case reports, and commentaries make for further interesting reading.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Early Removal of Urinary Catheter in Patients Undergoing Abdominal and Thoracic Surgeries with Continuous Thoracic Epidural Analgesia on Postoperative Urinary Retention. Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Still a Complex and Complicated Disease with Many Uncertainties and Challenges. The Role of Magnesium in Acute Pancreatitis and Pancreatic Injury: A Systematic Review. Endoscopic Resection of Neoplasia in the Lower GI Tract: A Clinical Algorithm. Endoscopy First: The Best Choice to Optimize Outcomes for Early Gastrointestinal Malignancy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1