在沉船中:霍克海默对黑格尔哲学的批判

Q3 Arts and Humanities Philosophical Readings Pub Date : 2020-10-16 DOI:10.5281/ZENODO.4072308

José Emilio Esteban Enguita

{"title":"在沉船中:霍克海默对黑格尔哲学的批判","authors":"José Emilio Esteban Enguita","doi":"10.5281/ZENODO.4072308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is twofold: on the one hand, to explain Horkheimer’s critique of hegelian philosophy, a critique that develops under the coordinates of the first project of Critical Theory; on the other hand, to show how Horkheimer’s critical reception of Hegel’s work is another indication of the differences within the Frankfurt School between Horkheimer’s positions and those of Adorno y Marcuse.","PeriodicalId":37926,"journal":{"name":"Philosophical Readings","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Entre los pecios del naufragio: la crítica de Horkheimer a la filosofía hegeliana\",\"authors\":\"José Emilio Esteban Enguita\",\"doi\":\"10.5281/ZENODO.4072308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of this paper is twofold: on the one hand, to explain Horkheimer’s critique of hegelian philosophy, a critique that develops under the coordinates of the first project of Critical Theory; on the other hand, to show how Horkheimer’s critical reception of Hegel’s work is another indication of the differences within the Frankfurt School between Horkheimer’s positions and those of Adorno y Marcuse.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philosophical Readings\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philosophical Readings\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4072308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophical Readings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/ZENODO.4072308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的目的是双重的:一方面，解释霍克海默对黑格尔哲学的批判，这种批判是在批判理论的第一个项目的坐标下发展起来的;另一方面，展示霍克海默对黑格尔著作的批判性接受，是法兰克福学派内部霍克海默的立场与阿多诺和马尔库塞的立场不同的另一个迹象。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Entre los pecios del naufragio: la crítica de Horkheimer a la filosofía hegeliana

The aim of this paper is twofold: on the one hand, to explain Horkheimer’s critique of hegelian philosophy, a critique that develops under the coordinates of the first project of Critical Theory; on the other hand, to show how Horkheimer’s critical reception of Hegel’s work is another indication of the differences within the Frankfurt School between Horkheimer’s positions and those of Adorno y Marcuse.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Philosophical Readings Arts and Humanities-Philosophy

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

14 weeks

期刊介绍： Philosophical Readings, a four-monthly journal, ISSN 2036-4989, features articles, discussions, translations, reviews, and bibliographical information on all philosophical disciplines. Philosophical Readings is a Open Access journal devoted to the promotion of competent and definitive contributions to philosophical knowledge. Not associated with any school or group, not the organ of any association or institution, it is interested in persistent and resolute inquiries into root questions, regardless of the writer’s affiliation. The journal welcomes also works that fall into various disciplines: religion, history, literature, law, political science, computer scnfoience, economics, and empirical sciences that deal with philosophical problems. Philosophical Readings uses a policy of blind review by at least two consultants to evaluate articles accepted for serious consideration. Philosophical Readings promotes special issues on particular topics of special relevance in the philosophical debates. Philosophical Readings occasionally has opportunities for Guest Editors for special issues of the journal. Anyone who has an idea for a special issue and would like that idea to be considered, should contact the Executive editor. Philosophical Readings publishes at least 9 original researches in a calendar year.