栓剂包装直肠异物:老年人自行插入栓剂的风险

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Psychogeriatrics Pub Date : 2022-03-16 DOI:10.1111/psyg.12826
Y. Otsuka, M. Nishikawa, Akinori Kinoshita, S. Deguchi, Atsushi Okita, K. Deguchi
{"title":"栓剂包装直肠异物:老年人自行插入栓剂的风险","authors":"Y. Otsuka, M. Nishikawa, Akinori Kinoshita, S. Deguchi, Atsushi Okita, K. Deguchi","doi":"10.1111/psyg.12826","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although drug packages are known to be a risk for upper gastrointestinal injury by accidental ingestion, they are not a common cause of rectal foreign bodies. Recently, we experienced a potential first case of a rectal foreign body caused by trans-anally inserted suppository packaging. A 78-year-old woman, diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease 6 years ago, was administered droxidopa and pyridostigmine for orthostatic hypotension over the course of a month. However, she developed diarrhoea and had to be admitted to adjust her dosage. The pyridostigmine dosage reduction improved the diarrhoea, but she developed constipation thereafter. Therefore, we decided to use a sodium bicarbonate and anhydrous sodium dihydrogen phosphate suppository. The patient insisted on self-insertion, due to which the nurse peeled off half the package and gave it to her. Immediately afterward, the patient complained of pain in the anal region and when we interviewed her, we found that she had inserted the suppository with the packaging still intact. The package could be felt upon rectal examination, but it was difficult to remove manually. Hence, the surgeon was consulted and it was removed through bedside anoscope (Fig. 1). No rectal ulcer or perforation occurred and, as planned, the patient was discharged two days later. Rectal foreign bodies are potentially dangerous due to a risk of gastrointestinal perforation and require prompt removal. Most are intentionally inserted via the anus during sexual activity, but sometimes they can be any of the following: accidental ingestion of toothpicks, meat or fish bones, or drug packages that get caught around the rectoanal transition. However, there are no reported cases of rectal foreign bodies developed after accidental insertion of suppository packages via the anus. Accidentally ingested suppository packages, as well as other drug packages, are a reported rectal perforation risk. If the packages are inserted in open position from the anus, they are difficult to remove because the flipped part of the package gets stuck like a fishhook. Since suppository packages are small and not visible on x-rays, elderly patients might be unable to reveal the history of insertion and consequently, delayed detection can lead to rectal ulceration or perforation. Therefore, we need to be aware of the potential risks of self-insertion of suppositories among the elderly, especially those who are cognitively","PeriodicalId":20784,"journal":{"name":"Psychogeriatrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rectal foreign body of suppository package: risk of self‐insertion of suppositories among elderly\",\"authors\":\"Y. Otsuka, M. Nishikawa, Akinori Kinoshita, S. Deguchi, Atsushi Okita, K. Deguchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/psyg.12826\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although drug packages are known to be a risk for upper gastrointestinal injury by accidental ingestion, they are not a common cause of rectal foreign bodies. Recently, we experienced a potential first case of a rectal foreign body caused by trans-anally inserted suppository packaging. A 78-year-old woman, diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease 6 years ago, was administered droxidopa and pyridostigmine for orthostatic hypotension over the course of a month. However, she developed diarrhoea and had to be admitted to adjust her dosage. The pyridostigmine dosage reduction improved the diarrhoea, but she developed constipation thereafter. Therefore, we decided to use a sodium bicarbonate and anhydrous sodium dihydrogen phosphate suppository. The patient insisted on self-insertion, due to which the nurse peeled off half the package and gave it to her. Immediately afterward, the patient complained of pain in the anal region and when we interviewed her, we found that she had inserted the suppository with the packaging still intact. The package could be felt upon rectal examination, but it was difficult to remove manually. Hence, the surgeon was consulted and it was removed through bedside anoscope (Fig. 1). No rectal ulcer or perforation occurred and, as planned, the patient was discharged two days later. Rectal foreign bodies are potentially dangerous due to a risk of gastrointestinal perforation and require prompt removal. Most are intentionally inserted via the anus during sexual activity, but sometimes they can be any of the following: accidental ingestion of toothpicks, meat or fish bones, or drug packages that get caught around the rectoanal transition. However, there are no reported cases of rectal foreign bodies developed after accidental insertion of suppository packages via the anus. Accidentally ingested suppository packages, as well as other drug packages, are a reported rectal perforation risk. If the packages are inserted in open position from the anus, they are difficult to remove because the flipped part of the package gets stuck like a fishhook. Since suppository packages are small and not visible on x-rays, elderly patients might be unable to reveal the history of insertion and consequently, delayed detection can lead to rectal ulceration or perforation. Therefore, we need to be aware of the potential risks of self-insertion of suppositories among the elderly, especially those who are cognitively\",\"PeriodicalId\":20784,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychogeriatrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychogeriatrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.12826\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychogeriatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psyg.12826","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管已知药物包装有意外摄入导致上消化道损伤的风险,但它们并不是直肠异物的常见原因。最近,我们经历了第一例由经肛门插入栓剂包装引起的直肠异物。一位78岁的女性,6年前被诊断为帕金森氏症,在一个月的时间里服用了卓西多帕和吡斯的明治疗直立性低血压。然而,她出现腹泻,不得不入院调整剂量。减少吡啶斯的明剂量改善了腹泻,但此后她出现了便秘。因此,我们决定使用碳酸氢钠和无水磷酸二氢钠栓剂。病人坚持要自行插入,因此护士把半个包裹剥开递给她。紧接着,患者抱怨肛门区域疼痛,当我们采访她时,我们发现她插入了栓剂,包装仍然完好无损。直肠检查时可以感觉到包裹,但很难手动取出。因此,咨询了外科医生,并通过床边肛门镜将其取出(图1)。没有发生直肠溃疡或穿孔,按计划,患者两天后出院。直肠异物由于有胃肠道穿孔的风险而具有潜在的危险性,需要立即清除。大多数是在性活动中故意通过肛门插入的,但有时可能是以下任何一种:意外摄入牙签、肉或鱼骨,或在直肠肛门过渡处被卡住的药物包。然而,目前尚无经肛门意外插入栓剂包后出现直肠异物的报告。据报道,意外摄入栓剂包和其他药物包有直肠穿孔的风险。如果包裹从肛门插入打开位置,它们很难取出,因为包裹的翻转部分会像鱼钩一样卡住。由于栓剂包很小,在x光片上看不到,老年患者可能无法透露插入史,因此,延迟检测可能导致直肠溃疡或穿孔。因此,我们需要意识到老年人自我插入栓剂的潜在风险,尤其是那些有认知能力的人
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rectal foreign body of suppository package: risk of self‐insertion of suppositories among elderly
Although drug packages are known to be a risk for upper gastrointestinal injury by accidental ingestion, they are not a common cause of rectal foreign bodies. Recently, we experienced a potential first case of a rectal foreign body caused by trans-anally inserted suppository packaging. A 78-year-old woman, diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease 6 years ago, was administered droxidopa and pyridostigmine for orthostatic hypotension over the course of a month. However, she developed diarrhoea and had to be admitted to adjust her dosage. The pyridostigmine dosage reduction improved the diarrhoea, but she developed constipation thereafter. Therefore, we decided to use a sodium bicarbonate and anhydrous sodium dihydrogen phosphate suppository. The patient insisted on self-insertion, due to which the nurse peeled off half the package and gave it to her. Immediately afterward, the patient complained of pain in the anal region and when we interviewed her, we found that she had inserted the suppository with the packaging still intact. The package could be felt upon rectal examination, but it was difficult to remove manually. Hence, the surgeon was consulted and it was removed through bedside anoscope (Fig. 1). No rectal ulcer or perforation occurred and, as planned, the patient was discharged two days later. Rectal foreign bodies are potentially dangerous due to a risk of gastrointestinal perforation and require prompt removal. Most are intentionally inserted via the anus during sexual activity, but sometimes they can be any of the following: accidental ingestion of toothpicks, meat or fish bones, or drug packages that get caught around the rectoanal transition. However, there are no reported cases of rectal foreign bodies developed after accidental insertion of suppository packages via the anus. Accidentally ingested suppository packages, as well as other drug packages, are a reported rectal perforation risk. If the packages are inserted in open position from the anus, they are difficult to remove because the flipped part of the package gets stuck like a fishhook. Since suppository packages are small and not visible on x-rays, elderly patients might be unable to reveal the history of insertion and consequently, delayed detection can lead to rectal ulceration or perforation. Therefore, we need to be aware of the potential risks of self-insertion of suppositories among the elderly, especially those who are cognitively
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychogeriatrics
Psychogeriatrics Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
115
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Psychogeriatrics is an international journal sponsored by the Japanese Psychogeriatric Society and publishes peer-reviewed original papers dealing with all aspects of psychogeriatrics and related fields The Journal encourages articles with gerontopsychiatric, neurobiological, genetic, diagnostic, social-psychiatric, health-political, psychological or psychotherapeutic content. Themes can be illuminated through basic science, clinical (human and animal) studies, case studies, epidemiological or humanistic research
期刊最新文献
Longitudinal relationship between loneliness and cognitive function among unmarried older adults in Malaysia: exploring gender disparities Low‐dose lamotrigine induces Pisa syndrome in a patient with probable corticobasal degeneration despite previous use Reply to ‘The clinical application value of psychological nursing intervention for patients with prostatic hyperplasia during treatment’ Beyond the stethoscope: ageism in white coats and resident physicians' preferences for elderly patient care Validity and reliability of the Checklist for Habitual Physical Activity for people 75 years and older in Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1