动物实验与社会:科学家的动机、激励和对公众宣传和参与活动的障碍

IF 0.6 4区 农林科学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY Society & Animals Pub Date : 2020-05-14 DOI:10.1163/15685306-00001674
F. C. D. Roten
{"title":"动物实验与社会:科学家的动机、激励和对公众宣传和参与活动的障碍","authors":"F. C. D. Roten","doi":"10.1163/15685306-00001674","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Scientists’ public outreach and engagement have been analyzed in many disciplines, but not in animal experimentation science, even though its relationship with society is complex. Research shows that scientists are active: they participate in public outreach and engagement activities. Scientists profile themselves mostly via the deficit model perspective, either in their attitudes or in the types of activities chosen. With regard to attitudes and behaviors, scientists are not a homogenous group but vary accord- ing to demographic and academic factors. This means that the relationship between science and society is predominantly determined by a group of scientists, which may reduce its richness. The study reveals tension between recognition of the importance of engagement and fears of being misquoted and of negative reactions from peers or the hierarchy.","PeriodicalId":22000,"journal":{"name":"Society & Animals","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15685306-00001674","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Animal Experimentation and Society: Scientists’ Motivations, Incentives, and Barriers toward Public Outreach and Engagement Activities\",\"authors\":\"F. C. D. Roten\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/15685306-00001674\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Scientists’ public outreach and engagement have been analyzed in many disciplines, but not in animal experimentation science, even though its relationship with society is complex. Research shows that scientists are active: they participate in public outreach and engagement activities. Scientists profile themselves mostly via the deficit model perspective, either in their attitudes or in the types of activities chosen. With regard to attitudes and behaviors, scientists are not a homogenous group but vary accord- ing to demographic and academic factors. This means that the relationship between science and society is predominantly determined by a group of scientists, which may reduce its richness. The study reveals tension between recognition of the importance of engagement and fears of being misquoted and of negative reactions from peers or the hierarchy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22000,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Society & Animals\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/15685306-00001674\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Society & Animals\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-00001674\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Society & Animals","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15685306-00001674","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科学家的公众宣传和参与已经在许多学科中进行了分析,但在动物实验科学中却没有,尽管它与社会的关系很复杂。研究表明,科学家是活跃的:他们参与公共宣传和参与活动。科学家大多通过缺陷模型的视角来描述自己,要么是他们的态度,要么是他们选择的活动类型。在态度和行为方面,科学家不是一个同质的群体,而是根据人口和学术因素而有所不同。这意味着科学与社会之间的关系主要是由一群科学家决定的,这可能会减少它的丰富性。这项研究揭示了对参与重要性的认识与对被错误引用的恐惧以及来自同事或上级的负面反应之间的紧张关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Animal Experimentation and Society: Scientists’ Motivations, Incentives, and Barriers toward Public Outreach and Engagement Activities
Scientists’ public outreach and engagement have been analyzed in many disciplines, but not in animal experimentation science, even though its relationship with society is complex. Research shows that scientists are active: they participate in public outreach and engagement activities. Scientists profile themselves mostly via the deficit model perspective, either in their attitudes or in the types of activities chosen. With regard to attitudes and behaviors, scientists are not a homogenous group but vary accord- ing to demographic and academic factors. This means that the relationship between science and society is predominantly determined by a group of scientists, which may reduce its richness. The study reveals tension between recognition of the importance of engagement and fears of being misquoted and of negative reactions from peers or the hierarchy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Society & Animals
Society & Animals 社会科学-兽医学
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
46
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Society & Animals publishes studies that describe and analyze our experiences of non-human animals from the perspective of various disciplines within both the Social Sciences (e.g., psychology, sociology, anthropology, political science) and the Humanities (e.g., history, literary criticism). The journal specifically deals with subjects such as human-animal interactions in various settings (animal cruelty, the therapeutic uses of animals), the applied uses of animals (research, education, medicine and agriculture), the use of animals in popular culture (e.g. dog-fighting, circus, animal companion, animal research), attitudes toward animals as affected by different socializing agencies and strategies, representations of animals in literature, the history of the domestication of animals, the politics of animal welfare, and the constitution of the animal rights movement.
期刊最新文献
Toward Commensalism: Deconstructing the Intersectionality of Racism and Speciesism Foster Puppies as Therapeutic Partners: A Model for Mutual Benefit Effects of Human-Dolphin Interactions on Tourist Knowledge of and Attitudes Toward Dolphins Coyote Killing: Where Species and Identities Collide Factors Associated with Children’s Humane Attitudes toward Animals
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1