韩国的Factive、IHRC和Cleft结构

IF 0.6 4区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Review of Cognitive Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-01-30 DOI:10.1075/rcl.00130.par
Chongwon Park, Jaehoon Yeon
{"title":"韩国的Factive、IHRC和Cleft结构","authors":"Chongwon Park, Jaehoon Yeon","doi":"10.1075/rcl.00130.par","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article aims to develop a Cognitive Grammar (CG) analysis of three grammatical constructions in Korean, all\n of which employ the bound noun kes. The data under examination includes the Factive, Internally Headed Relative\n Clause (IHRC), and Cleft constructions. We propose a uniform treatment of the three types of kes by arguing that\n it denotes a schematic noun that profiles a thing (noun) and has some role in the process of the adnominal\n clause. Different interpretations of these constructions arise due to different types of conceptualizations involved in each\n instance. In so doing, we point out that previous proposals that deal with kes are neither general enough to\n capture the commonalities observed in all three constructions nor can account for the new observations we present.","PeriodicalId":51932,"journal":{"name":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Factive, IHRC, and Cleft constructions in Korean\",\"authors\":\"Chongwon Park, Jaehoon Yeon\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/rcl.00130.par\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article aims to develop a Cognitive Grammar (CG) analysis of three grammatical constructions in Korean, all\\n of which employ the bound noun kes. The data under examination includes the Factive, Internally Headed Relative\\n Clause (IHRC), and Cleft constructions. We propose a uniform treatment of the three types of kes by arguing that\\n it denotes a schematic noun that profiles a thing (noun) and has some role in the process of the adnominal\\n clause. Different interpretations of these constructions arise due to different types of conceptualizations involved in each\\n instance. In so doing, we point out that previous proposals that deal with kes are neither general enough to\\n capture the commonalities observed in all three constructions nor can account for the new observations we present.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Review of Cognitive Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Review of Cognitive Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00130.par\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of Cognitive Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/rcl.00130.par","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在对韩国语中使用限定名词“kes”的三种语法结构进行认知语法分析。所检查的数据包括实作式、内头关系从句(IHRC)和间隙结构。我们提出了对三种类型的“kes”的统一处理,认为它表示一个表征事物(名词)的示意性名词,并在修饰从句的过程中起一定作用。由于每个实例中涉及不同类型的概念化,对这些结构产生了不同的解释。在这样做时,我们指出,先前处理kes的建议既不够普遍,无法捕捉到在所有三种结构中观察到的共性,也无法解释我们提出的新观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Factive, IHRC, and Cleft constructions in Korean
This article aims to develop a Cognitive Grammar (CG) analysis of three grammatical constructions in Korean, all of which employ the bound noun kes. The data under examination includes the Factive, Internally Headed Relative Clause (IHRC), and Cleft constructions. We propose a uniform treatment of the three types of kes by arguing that it denotes a schematic noun that profiles a thing (noun) and has some role in the process of the adnominal clause. Different interpretations of these constructions arise due to different types of conceptualizations involved in each instance. In so doing, we point out that previous proposals that deal with kes are neither general enough to capture the commonalities observed in all three constructions nor can account for the new observations we present.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
16
期刊最新文献
The view of meaning from a “postclassical” perspective Between source language constructions and target language expectations Intertextual satire in media discourse The semantic access mechanism of L3 Spanish words DOG and CAT proverbs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1