基于价格的技术模式的概率神经网络实证评价

IF 0.3 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE Algorithmic Finance Pub Date : 2017-04-13 DOI:10.3233/AF-160059
Samit Ahlawat
{"title":"基于价格的技术模式的概率神经网络实证评价","authors":"Samit Ahlawat","doi":"10.3233/AF-160059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Technical analysis is the art of identifying patterns in historical data with the belief that certain patterns foretell future price movements. An empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of technical analysis is confounded by the subjectivity involved in identifying patterns. This work presents a robust framework for pattern identification using probabilistic neural networks (PNN). The thirty components of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and a set of ten indices are considered. Fourteen patterns are analyzed. In order to test the possibility that technical patterns are more predictable in certain market environments, the period under study (1990–2015) is partitioned into bull and bear markets and the statistical significance of profits earned by identified patterns observed in each environment is analyzed. A range of holding periods from 10 to 50 trading days is considered and a simple model of transaction costs is added. The study reveals that no pattern produces statistically and economically significant profits for a cross-section of stocks and indices analyzed, though a few patterns are more successful predictors. Bullish (bearish) patterns are more reliable predictors in bullish (bearish) market environments. These observations can be explained by the Adaptive Market Hypothesis with certain patterns becoming more accurate predictors in specific market environments.","PeriodicalId":42207,"journal":{"name":"Algorithmic Finance","volume":"5 1","pages":"49-68"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/AF-160059","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical evaluation of price-based technical patterns using probabilistic neural networks\",\"authors\":\"Samit Ahlawat\",\"doi\":\"10.3233/AF-160059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Technical analysis is the art of identifying patterns in historical data with the belief that certain patterns foretell future price movements. An empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of technical analysis is confounded by the subjectivity involved in identifying patterns. This work presents a robust framework for pattern identification using probabilistic neural networks (PNN). The thirty components of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and a set of ten indices are considered. Fourteen patterns are analyzed. In order to test the possibility that technical patterns are more predictable in certain market environments, the period under study (1990–2015) is partitioned into bull and bear markets and the statistical significance of profits earned by identified patterns observed in each environment is analyzed. A range of holding periods from 10 to 50 trading days is considered and a simple model of transaction costs is added. The study reveals that no pattern produces statistically and economically significant profits for a cross-section of stocks and indices analyzed, though a few patterns are more successful predictors. Bullish (bearish) patterns are more reliable predictors in bullish (bearish) market environments. These observations can be explained by the Adaptive Market Hypothesis with certain patterns becoming more accurate predictors in specific market environments.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Algorithmic Finance\",\"volume\":\"5 1\",\"pages\":\"49-68\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.3233/AF-160059\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Algorithmic Finance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3233/AF-160059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Algorithmic Finance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/AF-160059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

技术分析是一种在历史数据中识别模式的艺术,相信某些模式预示着未来的价格走势。对技术分析有效性的实证评估被识别模式所涉及的主观性所混淆。这项工作提出了一个使用概率神经网络(PNN)进行模式识别的鲁棒框架。道琼斯工业平均指数的30个组成部分和一组10个指数被考虑在内。分析了14种模式。为了检验技术模式在某些市场环境中更具可预测性的可能性,将研究期间(1990-2015)划分为牛市和熊市,并分析在每个环境中观察到的已识别模式所赚取利润的统计显著性。考虑了10至50个交易日的持有期,并添加了交易成本的简单模型。研究表明,对于所分析的股票和指数的横截面,没有任何模式能产生统计和经济上显著的利润,尽管有一些模式是更成功的预测因素。看涨(看跌)模式是牛市(看跌)环境中更可靠的预测因素。这些观察结果可以用适应性市场假说来解释,在特定的市场环境中,某些模式成为更准确的预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Empirical evaluation of price-based technical patterns using probabilistic neural networks
Technical analysis is the art of identifying patterns in historical data with the belief that certain patterns foretell future price movements. An empirical evaluation of the effectiveness of technical analysis is confounded by the subjectivity involved in identifying patterns. This work presents a robust framework for pattern identification using probabilistic neural networks (PNN). The thirty components of the Dow Jones Industrial Average and a set of ten indices are considered. Fourteen patterns are analyzed. In order to test the possibility that technical patterns are more predictable in certain market environments, the period under study (1990–2015) is partitioned into bull and bear markets and the statistical significance of profits earned by identified patterns observed in each environment is analyzed. A range of holding periods from 10 to 50 trading days is considered and a simple model of transaction costs is added. The study reveals that no pattern produces statistically and economically significant profits for a cross-section of stocks and indices analyzed, though a few patterns are more successful predictors. Bullish (bearish) patterns are more reliable predictors in bullish (bearish) market environments. These observations can be explained by the Adaptive Market Hypothesis with certain patterns becoming more accurate predictors in specific market environments.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Algorithmic Finance
Algorithmic Finance BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
期刊介绍: Algorithmic Finance is both a nascent field of study and a new high-quality academic research journal that seeks to bridge computer science and finance. It covers such applications as: High frequency and algorithmic trading Statistical arbitrage strategies Momentum and other algorithmic portfolio management Machine learning and computational financial intelligence Agent-based finance Complexity and market efficiency Algorithmic analysis of derivatives valuation Behavioral finance and investor heuristics and algorithms Applications of quantum computation to finance News analytics and automated textual analysis.
期刊最新文献
Combining low-volatility and mean-reversion anomalies: Better together? Guidelines for building a realistic algorithmic trading market simulator for backtesting while incorporating market impact Graph embedded dynamic mode decomposition for stock price prediction Interest rate derivatives for the fractional Cox-Ingersoll-Ross model How smart is a momentum strategy? An empirical study of Indian equities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1