拉萨藏语与普通话名词群系统与结构的比较研究

IF 0.1 3区 文学 N/A LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum Pub Date : 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1075/langct.00049.wan
Pin Wang
{"title":"拉萨藏语与普通话名词群系统与结构的比较研究","authors":"Pin Wang","doi":"10.1075/langct.00049.wan","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This paper presents a text-based comparative study of the\n construal of entities through nominal groups in Lhasa Tibetan and Mandarin\n Chinese. It approaches the grammatical description of nominal groups from the\n ideational and textual perspectives, and gives priority to the perspective “from\n above”, taking as point of departure the discourse semantic systems of\n ideation and identification. From the perspective of\n ideation, the comparison focuses on the classification, description\n and quantification of entities. From the perspective of identification,\n the comparison focuses on the presentation or presumption of entities in\n discourse, and the determination and qualification of them. In terms of\n grammatical realisations, the nucleus function of a nominal group, Thing, enters\n into multivariate structures with a range of pre- and post-Thing functions.\n However, configuration and realisation of the functions are language-specific.\n This study makes explicit structural consequences of systemic choices in nominal\n group grammar, and attends to the problem of structural markers, drawing on the\n notion of “subjacency” structure proposed in Martin et al. (2021) and Martin and Doran (this issue).","PeriodicalId":29846,"journal":{"name":"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparative study of nominal group systems and structures between\\n Lhasa Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese\",\"authors\":\"Pin Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/langct.00049.wan\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This paper presents a text-based comparative study of the\\n construal of entities through nominal groups in Lhasa Tibetan and Mandarin\\n Chinese. It approaches the grammatical description of nominal groups from the\\n ideational and textual perspectives, and gives priority to the perspective “from\\n above”, taking as point of departure the discourse semantic systems of\\n ideation and identification. From the perspective of\\n ideation, the comparison focuses on the classification, description\\n and quantification of entities. From the perspective of identification,\\n the comparison focuses on the presentation or presumption of entities in\\n discourse, and the determination and qualification of them. In terms of\\n grammatical realisations, the nucleus function of a nominal group, Thing, enters\\n into multivariate structures with a range of pre- and post-Thing functions.\\n However, configuration and realisation of the functions are language-specific.\\n This study makes explicit structural consequences of systemic choices in nominal\\n group grammar, and attends to the problem of structural markers, drawing on the\\n notion of “subjacency” structure proposed in Martin et al. (2021) and Martin and Doran (this issue).\",\"PeriodicalId\":29846,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00049.wan\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"N/A\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Context and Text-The Social Semiotics Forum","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/langct.00049.wan","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以拉萨藏语和普通话为研究对象,对名义群体对实体的解释进行了基于文本的比较研究。它从概念和语篇的角度探讨名词群的语法描述,并以“从上面”的角度为优先,以概念和识别的话语语义系统为出发点。从概念的角度来看,比较侧重于实体的分类、描述和量化。从认同的角度来看,比较的重点是话语中实体的呈现或假设,以及它们的确定和限定。在语法实现方面,名词群的核心功能“物”进入多元结构,具有一系列“物前”和“物后”功能。然而,函数的配置和实现是特定于语言的。本研究明确了名称组语法中系统选择的结构后果,并关注结构标记的问题,借鉴了Martin et al.(2021)和Martin and Doran(本期)提出的“从属”结构的概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A comparative study of nominal group systems and structures between Lhasa Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese
This paper presents a text-based comparative study of the construal of entities through nominal groups in Lhasa Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese. It approaches the grammatical description of nominal groups from the ideational and textual perspectives, and gives priority to the perspective “from above”, taking as point of departure the discourse semantic systems of ideation and identification. From the perspective of ideation, the comparison focuses on the classification, description and quantification of entities. From the perspective of identification, the comparison focuses on the presentation or presumption of entities in discourse, and the determination and qualification of them. In terms of grammatical realisations, the nucleus function of a nominal group, Thing, enters into multivariate structures with a range of pre- and post-Thing functions. However, configuration and realisation of the functions are language-specific. This study makes explicit structural consequences of systemic choices in nominal group grammar, and attends to the problem of structural markers, drawing on the notion of “subjacency” structure proposed in Martin et al. (2021) and Martin and Doran (this issue).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
40.00%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Review of Harris (2021): The linguistics wars: Chomsky, Lakoff, and the battle over deep structure Graduating points of view in Spanish written language A comparative study of nominal group systems and structures between Lhasa Tibetan and Mandarin Chinese The diachronic analysis of resultative constructions Structure markers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1