创造力危机最新消息:美国追随亚洲追求高分而非学习

IF 1.7 Q2 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education Pub Date : 2021-01-02 DOI:10.1080/02783193.2020.1840464
Kyung H Kim
{"title":"创造力危机最新消息:美国追随亚洲追求高分而非学习","authors":"Kyung H Kim","doi":"10.1080/02783193.2020.1840464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Asian culture has been test-centric for over 1,400 years. U.S. education has been since the 1990s. Based on Kim’s creative Climates, Attitudes, and Thinking skills (CATs), creativity indicators were developed using the 2015 PISA questionnaires. Study I examined (a) relationships between students’ PISA science scores and CATs; (b) differences between Asian and U.S. students in PISA scores and CATs; and (c) relationships between teachers’ years of teaching and nurturing CATs. Study I found (a) negative relationships between students’ PISA scores and CATs, (b) Asian students demonstrating higher PISA scores but lower CATs than U.S. students, and (c) U.S. teachers decreasingly nurture CATs. Study II examined how U.S. CATs changed from 1990 through 2017 by analyzing TTCT norming data (N = 273,441) and found continued declines in CATs, especially in imagination and in young children.","PeriodicalId":46979,"journal":{"name":"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02783193.2020.1840464","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Creativity Crisis Update: America Follows Asia in Pursuing High Test Scores Over Learning\",\"authors\":\"Kyung H Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02783193.2020.1840464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Asian culture has been test-centric for over 1,400 years. U.S. education has been since the 1990s. Based on Kim’s creative Climates, Attitudes, and Thinking skills (CATs), creativity indicators were developed using the 2015 PISA questionnaires. Study I examined (a) relationships between students’ PISA science scores and CATs; (b) differences between Asian and U.S. students in PISA scores and CATs; and (c) relationships between teachers’ years of teaching and nurturing CATs. Study I found (a) negative relationships between students’ PISA scores and CATs, (b) Asian students demonstrating higher PISA scores but lower CATs than U.S. students, and (c) U.S. teachers decreasingly nurture CATs. Study II examined how U.S. CATs changed from 1990 through 2017 by analyzing TTCT norming data (N = 273,441) and found continued declines in CATs, especially in imagination and in young children.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02783193.2020.1840464\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1840464\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Roeper Review-A Journal on Gifted Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02783193.2020.1840464","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

1400多年来,亚洲文化一直以测试为中心。美国的教育自20世纪90年代以来就一直如此。根据金的创造性气候、态度和思维技能(CAT),使用2015年PISA问卷制定了创造性指标。研究I考察了(a)学生PISA科学成绩与CAT之间的关系;(b) 亚洲和美国学生在PISA成绩和CAT方面的差异;以及(c)教师的教学年限与培养CATs之间的关系。我的研究发现(a)学生的PISA成绩与CAT之间存在负相关,(b)亚洲学生的PISA成绩高于美国学生,但CAT低于美国学生,(c)美国教师对CAT的培养越来越少。研究二通过分析TTCT规范化数据(N=273441),研究了1990年至2017年美国CAT的变化,发现CAT持续下降,尤其是在想象力和幼儿中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Creativity Crisis Update: America Follows Asia in Pursuing High Test Scores Over Learning
ABSTRACT Asian culture has been test-centric for over 1,400 years. U.S. education has been since the 1990s. Based on Kim’s creative Climates, Attitudes, and Thinking skills (CATs), creativity indicators were developed using the 2015 PISA questionnaires. Study I examined (a) relationships between students’ PISA science scores and CATs; (b) differences between Asian and U.S. students in PISA scores and CATs; and (c) relationships between teachers’ years of teaching and nurturing CATs. Study I found (a) negative relationships between students’ PISA scores and CATs, (b) Asian students demonstrating higher PISA scores but lower CATs than U.S. students, and (c) U.S. teachers decreasingly nurture CATs. Study II examined how U.S. CATs changed from 1990 through 2017 by analyzing TTCT norming data (N = 273,441) and found continued declines in CATs, especially in imagination and in young children.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
20.00%
发文量
33
期刊最新文献
The Life and Work of Marcia Gentry: Providing Opportunities and Promoting Excellence Marcia Gentry: Early Research Passions and Subsequent Important Contributions to Equity and Diverse Students Marcia Gentry as Influencer: Leader, Scholar, Colleague, Friend Memories and Musings: My Experiences with Marcia Gentry and More Inspiring the Future: An Interview with Kenneth Kiewra
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1