{"title":"Wh & self:关于Wh条件句与自反加倍的关系","authors":"Wei-tien Dylan Tsai","doi":"10.1353/jcl.2023.a902797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Chinese wh-conditionals hold a very special status in linguistic typology. Cheng and Huang (1996) argues that the construction can be properly analyzed by treating a pair of identical wh-expressions as syntactic variables unselectively bound by an implicit necessity operator. Over the years, this line of thinking has been challenged by various proposals based on the comparison with indefinites, correlatives, E-type pronouns and questions. This Insight article argues for the unselective binding approach to this particular type of donkey sentences by alluding to quantificational reflexive doubling. Our findings not only lend support to the idea that an operator-variable pair is built on a sentential scale in Chinese, but also call for a fine-grained syntax and semantics of the typological correlations between reflexives and wh-in-situ.摘要:汉语的疑问词条件句在语言类型学中有其特殊的地位:Cheng & Huang (1996) 认为,将一对相同的疑问词分析为句法变量,并藉由隐性必要 算子进行无择约束,即可正确分析这类结构。基于无定名词组、对接 关系句、E 型代词和疑问结构的比较,多年来此一思路受到了来自各 方的挑战。本文鉴于量化性反身重复的平行用法,指出无择约束仍是 这类特殊驴子句的最佳分析。此一发现不仅支持汉语以语句规模来建 构「算子─变项」配对的观点,更敦促学界对反身词和在位疑问词的 类型关联进行更为细致的句法和语义研究。","PeriodicalId":44675,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Linguistics","volume":"51 1","pages":"467 - 482"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wh & self: On correlating wh-conditionals and reflexive doubling\",\"authors\":\"Wei-tien Dylan Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1353/jcl.2023.a902797\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Chinese wh-conditionals hold a very special status in linguistic typology. Cheng and Huang (1996) argues that the construction can be properly analyzed by treating a pair of identical wh-expressions as syntactic variables unselectively bound by an implicit necessity operator. Over the years, this line of thinking has been challenged by various proposals based on the comparison with indefinites, correlatives, E-type pronouns and questions. This Insight article argues for the unselective binding approach to this particular type of donkey sentences by alluding to quantificational reflexive doubling. Our findings not only lend support to the idea that an operator-variable pair is built on a sentential scale in Chinese, but also call for a fine-grained syntax and semantics of the typological correlations between reflexives and wh-in-situ.摘要:汉语的疑问词条件句在语言类型学中有其特殊的地位:Cheng & Huang (1996) 认为,将一对相同的疑问词分析为句法变量,并藉由隐性必要 算子进行无择约束,即可正确分析这类结构。基于无定名词组、对接 关系句、E 型代词和疑问结构的比较,多年来此一思路受到了来自各 方的挑战。本文鉴于量化性反身重复的平行用法,指出无择约束仍是 这类特殊驴子句的最佳分析。此一发现不仅支持汉语以语句规模来建 构「算子─变项」配对的观点,更敦促学界对反身词和在位疑问词的 类型关联进行更为细致的句法和语义研究。\",\"PeriodicalId\":44675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Chinese Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"467 - 482\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Chinese Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2023.a902797\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2023.a902797","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
ABSTRACT: Chinese wh conditions hold a very special status in linguistic typology Cheng and Huang (1996) argue that the construction can be properly analyzed by treating a pair of identical wh expressions as syntactic variables unselectively bound by an implicit necessity operator Over the years, this line of thinking has been challenged by various proposals based on the comparison with definitions, correlations, E-type pronouns and questions This Insight article arguments for the unselective binding approach to this specific type of donkey sentiments by allowing to quantify reflex doubling Our findings not only lend support to the idea that an operator variable pair is built on a essential scale in Chinese, but also calls for a fine-grained syntax and semantics of the typological correlations between reflexes and wh-in-situ, And by using implicit necessary operators for non selective constraints, such structures can be correctly analyzed. Over the years, this approach has been challenged by various parties based on the comparison of indefinite noun groups, connected relative sentences, E-type pronouns, and interrogative structures. Given the parallel usage of quantitative reflexive repetition, this article points out that non selective constraints are still the best analysis for this type of special donkey sentence. This discovery not only supports the view that Chinese constructs "operator variable" pairs based on sentence size, but also urges the academic community to conduct more detailed syntactic and semantic research on the type associations between reflexives and in place interrogative words.
Wh & self: On correlating wh-conditionals and reflexive doubling
ABSTRACT:Chinese wh-conditionals hold a very special status in linguistic typology. Cheng and Huang (1996) argues that the construction can be properly analyzed by treating a pair of identical wh-expressions as syntactic variables unselectively bound by an implicit necessity operator. Over the years, this line of thinking has been challenged by various proposals based on the comparison with indefinites, correlatives, E-type pronouns and questions. This Insight article argues for the unselective binding approach to this particular type of donkey sentences by alluding to quantificational reflexive doubling. Our findings not only lend support to the idea that an operator-variable pair is built on a sentential scale in Chinese, but also call for a fine-grained syntax and semantics of the typological correlations between reflexives and wh-in-situ.摘要:汉语的疑问词条件句在语言类型学中有其特殊的地位:Cheng & Huang (1996) 认为,将一对相同的疑问词分析为句法变量,并藉由隐性必要 算子进行无择约束,即可正确分析这类结构。基于无定名词组、对接 关系句、E 型代词和疑问结构的比较,多年来此一思路受到了来自各 方的挑战。本文鉴于量化性反身重复的平行用法,指出无择约束仍是 这类特殊驴子句的最佳分析。此一发现不仅支持汉语以语句规模来建 构「算子─变项」配对的观点,更敦促学界对反身词和在位疑问词的 类型关联进行更为细致的句法和语义研究。
期刊介绍:
Journal of Chinese Linguistics (JCL) is an academic journal, which comprises research content from both general linguistics and Chinese linguistics. It is edited by a distinguished editorial board of international expertise. There are two publications: Journal of Chinese Linguistics (JCL) and Journal of Chinese Linguistics Monograph Series (JCLMS).