人在变化的世界:如何协调个人计划?

IF 0.7 Q3 ECONOMICS Voprosy Ekonomiki Pub Date : 2023-07-10 DOI:10.32609/0042-8736-2023-7-50-80
A. Shastitko, S. I. Fedorov
{"title":"人在变化的世界:如何协调个人计划?","authors":"A. Shastitko, S. I. Fedorov","doi":"10.32609/0042-8736-2023-7-50-80","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2022 political issues made significant adjustments to individual economic plans of hundreds of millions of people around the  world. Against this background, the idea  of  industrial regulation is gaining popularity again  as  a  means  to overcome the  shocks that have arisen. However, how effective is such a mechanism for coordinating efforts to adapt to changes? In our article, we propose  to look at the  problem through the  analysis  of two models  of man:  the  entrepreneur in Austrian economics  and  the  limited rational person  in the  transaction costs economics. Based  on the  results of the  analysis  we reconstruct the  process  of adapting the  market  (or industry) to the shock  using  a formalized model  of the  game  theory. The model  allows  us to demonstrate two key informational problems of adaptation to changes:  individuals’ limited rationality and  their heterogeneity in terms of “entrepreneurial alertness”. For  industrial policy, this means  the  expediency of comparing the  regulatory intervention’s benefits and costs during the  shock period, taking into account the  entrepreneurs’ advantage over the  regulator in the  collection and  use of dispersed knowledge.","PeriodicalId":45534,"journal":{"name":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Man in a changing world: How to coordinate individual plans?\",\"authors\":\"A. Shastitko, S. I. Fedorov\",\"doi\":\"10.32609/0042-8736-2023-7-50-80\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In 2022 political issues made significant adjustments to individual economic plans of hundreds of millions of people around the  world. Against this background, the idea  of  industrial regulation is gaining popularity again  as  a  means  to overcome the  shocks that have arisen. However, how effective is such a mechanism for coordinating efforts to adapt to changes? In our article, we propose  to look at the  problem through the  analysis  of two models  of man:  the  entrepreneur in Austrian economics  and  the  limited rational person  in the  transaction costs economics. Based  on the  results of the  analysis  we reconstruct the  process  of adapting the  market  (or industry) to the shock  using  a formalized model  of the  game  theory. The model  allows  us to demonstrate two key informational problems of adaptation to changes:  individuals’ limited rationality and  their heterogeneity in terms of “entrepreneurial alertness”. For  industrial policy, this means  the  expediency of comparing the  regulatory intervention’s benefits and costs during the  shock period, taking into account the  entrepreneurs’ advantage over the  regulator in the  collection and  use of dispersed knowledge.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45534,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Voprosy Ekonomiki\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Voprosy Ekonomiki\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-7-50-80\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Voprosy Ekonomiki","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2023-7-50-80","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2022年,政治问题对全球数亿人的个人经济计划进行了重大调整。在这种背景下,作为克服已经出现的冲击的一种手段,工业监管的想法再次受到欢迎。然而,这种协调努力以适应变化的机制的有效性如何?在本文中,我们建议通过分析两种人的模型来看待这个问题:奥地利经济学中的企业家和交易成本经济学中的有限理性人。基于分析结果,我们使用博弈论的形式化模型重建了市场(或行业)适应冲击的过程。该模型使我们能够证明适应变化的两个关键信息问题:个人的有限理性和他们在“创业警觉性”方面的异质性。对于产业政策来说,这意味着在冲击期比较监管干预的收益和成本,同时考虑到企业家在收集和使用分散知识方面相对于监管机构的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Man in a changing world: How to coordinate individual plans?
In 2022 political issues made significant adjustments to individual economic plans of hundreds of millions of people around the  world. Against this background, the idea  of  industrial regulation is gaining popularity again  as  a  means  to overcome the  shocks that have arisen. However, how effective is such a mechanism for coordinating efforts to adapt to changes? In our article, we propose  to look at the  problem through the  analysis  of two models  of man:  the  entrepreneur in Austrian economics  and  the  limited rational person  in the  transaction costs economics. Based  on the  results of the  analysis  we reconstruct the  process  of adapting the  market  (or industry) to the shock  using  a formalized model  of the  game  theory. The model  allows  us to demonstrate two key informational problems of adaptation to changes:  individuals’ limited rationality and  their heterogeneity in terms of “entrepreneurial alertness”. For  industrial policy, this means  the  expediency of comparing the  regulatory intervention’s benefits and costs during the  shock period, taking into account the  entrepreneurs’ advantage over the  regulator in the  collection and  use of dispersed knowledge.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Voprosy Ekonomiki
Voprosy Ekonomiki ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
25.00%
发文量
86
期刊最新文献
The world in the maze of sanctions: Ambiguity of empirical evidence How does bank lending affect small and medium-sized businesses? Reform of capital adequacy regulation in the world Islamic banking market Talents and their professors: What and how to teach? Reform of economic education or reform of economic knowledge?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1