白色洗涤白色永恒:现代早期英国对白色物质性的(dis)/(re)记忆

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE Literature Compass Pub Date : 2022-12-05 DOI:10.1111/lic3.12659
Matthieu Chapman
{"title":"白色洗涤白色永恒:现代早期英国对白色物质性的(dis)/(re)记忆","authors":"Matthieu Chapman","doi":"10.1111/lic3.12659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In early modern English drama, black flesh is remarkable. In the Shakespeare canon, the visibly black flesh of the eponymous Moor of Venice in <i>Othello</i> and the villainous Aaron in <i>Titus Andronicus</i> has been the subject of scholarly analysis for centuries. Yet, in a field that has placed so much emphasis on flesh marked by color, unmarked flesh is imbued with assumptions of whiteness that make unremarkable, a privilege that renders it unthought and uncritiqued, processes that contribute to the normativity of whiteness as inextricable from subjectivity. This rhetoric of whiteness as largely unremarkable continues to influence our modern conceptualizations of what Shakespeare looks like both in our minds and on the stage. Too often, modern productions of Shakespeare engage in casting practices that elide important early modern identity distinctions in service of contemporary white supremacy. For instance, national identity—the difference between being English, Irish, Scottish, French, etc—mattered both for character and actor on the Early Modern English stage. Yet, these distinctions fade into the fringes of memory when casting today's productions, allowing directors to include and exclude bodies based on modern conceptions of racial difference and mis-remembering of whiteness as a coherent and stable early modern identity. But whiteness was neither so stable nor so stoic in Shakespeare's day or in the works of Shakespeare as our modern theatrical culture continually mis-remembers and re-performs. This essay engages with the ways in which the modern theatre mis-remembers Shakespeare in relation to whiteness to reinforce white supremacy. This essay uses contemporary theories of Afro-Pessimism and Black Critical Theory to destabilize the mythology of white permanence that undergirds Renaissance history. I argue that the notions of the stable white corporeal whole that scholars and artists assume of the majority of Shakespeare's characters requires an anachronistic reading of whiteness that is the product of chattel slavery and a paradigm that relies on the destruction of black flesh for the unified white body to gain corporeal coherence. The essay concludes with a critique of epistemology arguing that this forgetting of the historical dismemberment of white flesh makes us mis-remember the role of whiteness in our present.</p>","PeriodicalId":45243,"journal":{"name":"Literature Compass","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Whitewashing white permanence: The (dis)/(re)membering of white corporeality in early modern England\",\"authors\":\"Matthieu Chapman\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/lic3.12659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In early modern English drama, black flesh is remarkable. In the Shakespeare canon, the visibly black flesh of the eponymous Moor of Venice in <i>Othello</i> and the villainous Aaron in <i>Titus Andronicus</i> has been the subject of scholarly analysis for centuries. Yet, in a field that has placed so much emphasis on flesh marked by color, unmarked flesh is imbued with assumptions of whiteness that make unremarkable, a privilege that renders it unthought and uncritiqued, processes that contribute to the normativity of whiteness as inextricable from subjectivity. This rhetoric of whiteness as largely unremarkable continues to influence our modern conceptualizations of what Shakespeare looks like both in our minds and on the stage. Too often, modern productions of Shakespeare engage in casting practices that elide important early modern identity distinctions in service of contemporary white supremacy. For instance, national identity—the difference between being English, Irish, Scottish, French, etc—mattered both for character and actor on the Early Modern English stage. Yet, these distinctions fade into the fringes of memory when casting today's productions, allowing directors to include and exclude bodies based on modern conceptions of racial difference and mis-remembering of whiteness as a coherent and stable early modern identity. But whiteness was neither so stable nor so stoic in Shakespeare's day or in the works of Shakespeare as our modern theatrical culture continually mis-remembers and re-performs. This essay engages with the ways in which the modern theatre mis-remembers Shakespeare in relation to whiteness to reinforce white supremacy. This essay uses contemporary theories of Afro-Pessimism and Black Critical Theory to destabilize the mythology of white permanence that undergirds Renaissance history. I argue that the notions of the stable white corporeal whole that scholars and artists assume of the majority of Shakespeare's characters requires an anachronistic reading of whiteness that is the product of chattel slavery and a paradigm that relies on the destruction of black flesh for the unified white body to gain corporeal coherence. The essay concludes with a critique of epistemology arguing that this forgetting of the historical dismemberment of white flesh makes us mis-remember the role of whiteness in our present.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45243,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Literature Compass\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Literature Compass\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lic3.12659\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Literature Compass","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/lic3.12659","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在早期现代英国戏剧中,黑肉是引人注目的。在莎士比亚经典中,《奥赛罗》中威尼斯摩尔人明显的黑色肉体和《提图斯·安德洛尼克斯》中邪恶的亚伦几个世纪以来一直是学术分析的主题。然而,在一个如此强调以颜色标记的肉体的领域,没有标记的肉体充满了对白色的假设,这使得它不引人注目,这是一种使它不被思考和不被批评的特权,这一过程有助于白色的规范性,因为它与主观性密不可分。这种关于白人的修辞在很大程度上并不引人注目,继续影响着我们对莎士比亚在我们心中和舞台上的形象的现代观念。很多时候,莎士比亚的现代作品在选角时忽略了重要的早期现代身份差异,以服务于当代白人至上主义。例如,民族身份——英格兰人、爱尔兰人、苏格兰人、法国人等之间的区别——对早期现代英国舞台上的人物和演员都很重要。然而,当选择今天的作品时,这些区别逐渐消失在记忆的边缘,允许导演根据种族差异的现代概念包括或排除身体,并错误地记住白人作为连贯和稳定的早期现代身份。但是,在莎士比亚的时代,在莎士比亚的作品中,白色既不那么稳定,也不那么坚忍,因为我们的现代戏剧文化不断地错误地记忆和重新表演。这篇文章探讨了现代戏剧如何在与白人的关系中错误地记住莎士比亚,以加强白人至上主义。本文运用当代的非洲悲观主义理论和黑人批判理论来动摇支撑文艺复兴历史的白人永恒的神话。我认为,学者和艺术家对莎士比亚大部分角色所假定的稳定的白人身体整体的概念,要求对白人的时代错误的解读,即奴隶制的产物,以及一种依赖于破坏黑人肉体以获得统一的白人身体连贯性的范式。文章最后对认识论进行了批判,认为这种对白色肉体的历史肢解的遗忘使我们错误地记住了白色在我们现在的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Whitewashing white permanence: The (dis)/(re)membering of white corporeality in early modern England

In early modern English drama, black flesh is remarkable. In the Shakespeare canon, the visibly black flesh of the eponymous Moor of Venice in Othello and the villainous Aaron in Titus Andronicus has been the subject of scholarly analysis for centuries. Yet, in a field that has placed so much emphasis on flesh marked by color, unmarked flesh is imbued with assumptions of whiteness that make unremarkable, a privilege that renders it unthought and uncritiqued, processes that contribute to the normativity of whiteness as inextricable from subjectivity. This rhetoric of whiteness as largely unremarkable continues to influence our modern conceptualizations of what Shakespeare looks like both in our minds and on the stage. Too often, modern productions of Shakespeare engage in casting practices that elide important early modern identity distinctions in service of contemporary white supremacy. For instance, national identity—the difference between being English, Irish, Scottish, French, etc—mattered both for character and actor on the Early Modern English stage. Yet, these distinctions fade into the fringes of memory when casting today's productions, allowing directors to include and exclude bodies based on modern conceptions of racial difference and mis-remembering of whiteness as a coherent and stable early modern identity. But whiteness was neither so stable nor so stoic in Shakespeare's day or in the works of Shakespeare as our modern theatrical culture continually mis-remembers and re-performs. This essay engages with the ways in which the modern theatre mis-remembers Shakespeare in relation to whiteness to reinforce white supremacy. This essay uses contemporary theories of Afro-Pessimism and Black Critical Theory to destabilize the mythology of white permanence that undergirds Renaissance history. I argue that the notions of the stable white corporeal whole that scholars and artists assume of the majority of Shakespeare's characters requires an anachronistic reading of whiteness that is the product of chattel slavery and a paradigm that relies on the destruction of black flesh for the unified white body to gain corporeal coherence. The essay concludes with a critique of epistemology arguing that this forgetting of the historical dismemberment of white flesh makes us mis-remember the role of whiteness in our present.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Literature Compass
Literature Compass LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Chaucerian Theatricality: Then and Now Medievalism, Orientalism, and the Botany of the Holy Land Rehearsing Words and Gestures in Chaucer's Troilus and Criseyde Islamic Medievalism and Mobility in Mathias Énard's Street of Thieves Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1