自动驾驶中可能发生故障的地方:故障树分析方法

IF 2.2 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making Pub Date : 2022-08-06 DOI:10.1177/15553434221116254
Kuan-Ting Chen, H. Chen, Ann Bisantz, Su Shen, Ercan Sahin
{"title":"自动驾驶中可能发生故障的地方:故障树分析方法","authors":"Kuan-Ting Chen, H. Chen, Ann Bisantz, Su Shen, Ercan Sahin","doi":"10.1177/15553434221116254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There will be circumstances where partial or conditionally automated vehicles fail to drive safely and require human interventions. Within the human factors community, the taxonomies surrounding control transitions have primarily focused on characterizing the stages and sequences of the transition between the automated driving system (ADS) and the human driver. Recognizing the variance in operational design domains (ODDs) across vehicles equipped with ADS and how variable the takeover situations may be, we describe a simple taxonomy of takeover situations to aid the identification and discussions of takeover scenarios in future takeover studies. By considering the ODD structure and the human information processing stages, we constructed a fault tree analysis (FTA) aimed to identify potential failure sources that would prevent successful control transitions. The FTA was applied in analyzing two real-world accidents involving ADS failures, illustrating how this approach can help identify areas for improvements in the system, interface, or training design to support drivers in level 2 and level 3 automated driving.","PeriodicalId":46342,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","volume":"17 1","pages":"147 - 165"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Where Failures May Occur in Automated Driving: A Fault Tree Analysis Approach\",\"authors\":\"Kuan-Ting Chen, H. Chen, Ann Bisantz, Su Shen, Ercan Sahin\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/15553434221116254\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There will be circumstances where partial or conditionally automated vehicles fail to drive safely and require human interventions. Within the human factors community, the taxonomies surrounding control transitions have primarily focused on characterizing the stages and sequences of the transition between the automated driving system (ADS) and the human driver. Recognizing the variance in operational design domains (ODDs) across vehicles equipped with ADS and how variable the takeover situations may be, we describe a simple taxonomy of takeover situations to aid the identification and discussions of takeover scenarios in future takeover studies. By considering the ODD structure and the human information processing stages, we constructed a fault tree analysis (FTA) aimed to identify potential failure sources that would prevent successful control transitions. The FTA was applied in analyzing two real-world accidents involving ADS failures, illustrating how this approach can help identify areas for improvements in the system, interface, or training design to support drivers in level 2 and level 3 automated driving.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"147 - 165\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434221116254\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15553434221116254","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在某些情况下,部分或有条件的自动化车辆无法安全驾驶,需要人工干预。在人为因素群落中,围绕控制转换的分类法主要集中于表征自动驾驶系统(ADS)和人类驾驶员之间转换的阶段和顺序。认识到配备ADS的车辆在作战设计域(ODD)方面的差异,以及接管情况的变化程度,我们描述了接管情况的简单分类,以帮助在未来的接管研究中识别和讨论接管情况。通过考虑ODD结构和人类信息处理阶段,我们构建了一个故障树分析(FTA),旨在识别阻止成功控制转换的潜在故障源。FTA被应用于分析两起涉及ADS故障的真实事故,说明了这种方法如何帮助确定系统、接口或培训设计的改进领域,以支持驾驶员进行2级和3级自动驾驶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Where Failures May Occur in Automated Driving: A Fault Tree Analysis Approach
There will be circumstances where partial or conditionally automated vehicles fail to drive safely and require human interventions. Within the human factors community, the taxonomies surrounding control transitions have primarily focused on characterizing the stages and sequences of the transition between the automated driving system (ADS) and the human driver. Recognizing the variance in operational design domains (ODDs) across vehicles equipped with ADS and how variable the takeover situations may be, we describe a simple taxonomy of takeover situations to aid the identification and discussions of takeover scenarios in future takeover studies. By considering the ODD structure and the human information processing stages, we constructed a fault tree analysis (FTA) aimed to identify potential failure sources that would prevent successful control transitions. The FTA was applied in analyzing two real-world accidents involving ADS failures, illustrating how this approach can help identify areas for improvements in the system, interface, or training design to support drivers in level 2 and level 3 automated driving.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Is the Pull-Down Effect Overstated? An Examination of Trust Propagation Among Fighter Pilots in a High-Fidelity Simulation A Taxonomy for AI Hazard Analysis Understanding Automation Failure Integrating Function Allocation and Operational Event Sequence Diagrams to Support Human-Robot Coordination: Case Study of a Robotic Date Thinning System Adapting Cognitive Task Analysis Methods for Use in a Large Sample Simulation Study of High-Risk Healthcare Events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1