Mussolini's Theatre: Fascist Experiments in Art and Politics By Patricia Gaborik. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2021; pp. xiii + 312, 20 illustrations, 13 tables. $39.99 cloth, $32 e-book.

With the dramatic global resurgence of far-Right politics, it behooves critics to come to terms with the legacies of Fascism and its relationship to cultural production. How did Mussolini attempt to guide or co-opt theatre for his own purposes? Many scholars have followed Walter Benjamin in arguing that Fascism aestheticized politics, that Mussolini himself used the actor’s art to become a character in his own political play, that ultimately “the fascist mode was inherently performative, irrational, and coercive” (7). But, as Patricia Gaborik argues in her carefully argued and impressively documented Mussolini’s Theatre: Fascist Experiments in Art and Politics, this focus on Fascism as an aestheticized political experiment neglects the actual situation of the theatre under Mussolini, acting “as if what was produced on stage doesn’t actually matter—as if, that is, when it comes to fascism, art is not an issue” (12). What if, instead of assuming that all theatrical productions under Mussolini were only—could only be—so many forms of propaganda, we look instead at what was actually produced during the ventennio? Gaborik shows that theatre under Mussolini was more complicated than we’ve imagined. Although some plays produced under Fascism toed the party line, most did not, nor were they punished for it. In fact, a kind of strategic aestheticism reigned: Mussolini consistently demonstrated a commitment to art “that went beyond the tactical” and elevated “spiritual valor over immediate propagandistic efficacy” (19). Why? Because, Gaborik argues, Mussolini approached the theatre in two complementary ways that highlighted his “faith in culture as a revolutionary tool” (45). First, he kept the theatre relatively free to demonstrate the alleged openness of his regime, to demonstrate that artists in Fascist Italy were free to follow their genius. Here he followed a strategy of diplomacy, recognizing that theatre