放大的声音:与阿姆斯特丹殖民历史的接触与分离

IF 0.8 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Heritage and Society Pub Date : 2020-05-03 DOI:10.1080/2159032X.2021.1901335
C. Ariese
{"title":"放大的声音:与阿姆斯特丹殖民历史的接触与分离","authors":"C. Ariese","doi":"10.1080/2159032X.2021.1901335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT As the metropole and main harbor city of a colonial, maritime empire, much of Amsterdam's development has been the direct or indirect result of colonial activities. Yet, many aspects of colonialism and its lasting entanglements were not (widely) spoken about. In response, within the cultural sphere, de-colonial engagements have arisen across various institutions and related to multiple aspects of colonialism, most prominently the topic of slavery. This paper identifies and analyzes recent examples of such de-colonial engagements – e.g., the exhibition Afterlives of Slavery, the installation Blood Sugar, and the publication Words Matter – which have created or amplified conversations about colonial pasts. It seeks to show that artists and activists are often the initiators of these challenges to existing paradigms and perspectives, but that afterwards these voices are amplified by cultural and scientific institutions, before resonating within the public sphere. The recent (2019) controversy surrounding the use of the term “Golden Age” is a case in point. Yet, despite these amplifying de-colonial conversations, there are still significant silences and absences, revealing the borders of tolerance in terms of dealing with colonialism in the contemporary. The intention is therefore also to understand how these voices are not only amplified but also potentially altered or even limited as they move from activist arenas, through cultural institutions, into the wider public eye.","PeriodicalId":44088,"journal":{"name":"Heritage and Society","volume":"13 1","pages":"117 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2159032X.2021.1901335","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amplifying Voices: Engaging and Disengaging with Colonial Pasts in Amsterdam\",\"authors\":\"C. Ariese\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/2159032X.2021.1901335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT As the metropole and main harbor city of a colonial, maritime empire, much of Amsterdam's development has been the direct or indirect result of colonial activities. Yet, many aspects of colonialism and its lasting entanglements were not (widely) spoken about. In response, within the cultural sphere, de-colonial engagements have arisen across various institutions and related to multiple aspects of colonialism, most prominently the topic of slavery. This paper identifies and analyzes recent examples of such de-colonial engagements – e.g., the exhibition Afterlives of Slavery, the installation Blood Sugar, and the publication Words Matter – which have created or amplified conversations about colonial pasts. It seeks to show that artists and activists are often the initiators of these challenges to existing paradigms and perspectives, but that afterwards these voices are amplified by cultural and scientific institutions, before resonating within the public sphere. The recent (2019) controversy surrounding the use of the term “Golden Age” is a case in point. Yet, despite these amplifying de-colonial conversations, there are still significant silences and absences, revealing the borders of tolerance in terms of dealing with colonialism in the contemporary. The intention is therefore also to understand how these voices are not only amplified but also potentially altered or even limited as they move from activist arenas, through cultural institutions, into the wider public eye.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Heritage and Society\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"117 - 142\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/2159032X.2021.1901335\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Heritage and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2021.1901335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heritage and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/2159032X.2021.1901335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

作为一个殖民海洋帝国的大都市和主要港口城市,阿姆斯特丹的许多发展都是殖民活动直接或间接的结果。然而,殖民主义的许多方面及其持久的纠缠并没有(广泛地)被谈论。作为回应,在文化领域内,反殖民活动在各种机构中出现,并与殖民主义的多个方面有关,最突出的是奴隶制的主题。本文确定并分析了最近这种去殖民参与的例子——例如,展览《奴隶制的余世》、装置作品《血糖》和出版物《话语很重要》——这些例子创造或扩大了对殖民历史的讨论。它试图表明,艺术家和活动家往往是这些挑战现有范式和观点的发起者,但之后这些声音被文化和科学机构放大,然后在公共领域产生共鸣。最近(2019年)围绕“黄金时代”一词的使用引发的争议就是一个很好的例子。然而,尽管这些去殖民主义的对话扩大了,但仍有大量的沉默和缺席,揭示了在当代处理殖民主义方面容忍的边界。因此,我们的目的也是要了解这些声音是如何被放大的,而且当它们从活动家的舞台,通过文化机构,进入更广泛的公众视野时,它们是如何被改变甚至限制的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Amplifying Voices: Engaging and Disengaging with Colonial Pasts in Amsterdam
ABSTRACT As the metropole and main harbor city of a colonial, maritime empire, much of Amsterdam's development has been the direct or indirect result of colonial activities. Yet, many aspects of colonialism and its lasting entanglements were not (widely) spoken about. In response, within the cultural sphere, de-colonial engagements have arisen across various institutions and related to multiple aspects of colonialism, most prominently the topic of slavery. This paper identifies and analyzes recent examples of such de-colonial engagements – e.g., the exhibition Afterlives of Slavery, the installation Blood Sugar, and the publication Words Matter – which have created or amplified conversations about colonial pasts. It seeks to show that artists and activists are often the initiators of these challenges to existing paradigms and perspectives, but that afterwards these voices are amplified by cultural and scientific institutions, before resonating within the public sphere. The recent (2019) controversy surrounding the use of the term “Golden Age” is a case in point. Yet, despite these amplifying de-colonial conversations, there are still significant silences and absences, revealing the borders of tolerance in terms of dealing with colonialism in the contemporary. The intention is therefore also to understand how these voices are not only amplified but also potentially altered or even limited as they move from activist arenas, through cultural institutions, into the wider public eye.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Heritage and Society
Heritage and Society HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
期刊介绍: Heritage & Society is a global, peer-reviewed journal that provides a forum for scholarly, professional, and community reflection on the cultural, political, and economic impacts of heritage on contemporary society. We seek to examine the current social roles of collective memory, historic preservation, cultural resource management, public interpretation, cultural preservation and revitalization, sites of conscience, diasporic heritage, education, legal/legislative developments, cultural heritage ethics, and central heritage concepts such as authenticity, significance, and value. The journal provides an engaging forum about tangible and intangible heritage for those who work with international and governmental organizations, academic institutions, private heritage consulting and CRM firms, and local, associated, and indigenous communities. With a special emphasis on social science approaches and an international perspective, the journal will facilitate lively, critical discussion and dissemination of practical data among heritage professionals, planners, policymakers, and community leaders.
期刊最新文献
Cultural heritage management in Africa: the heritage of the colonized Cultural heritage management in Africa: the heritage of the colonized , edited by G. O. Abungu and W. Ndoro, London, Routledge, 2023, 306 Pages, 33 B/W Illustrations, £34.99 Paperback, ISBN 9781032055619 Changing Views on Heritage Through Time: The Listing of Monastic Heritage in Portugal Spatial Imaginaries “from the Ground”: Framing Fez’s Medina Contemporary Identity Graphic Heritage and the Making of Place Social Impact Assessment of Reconstruction Projects in the Historical Districts Case Study: Bein-Al-Haramain, Shiraz
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1