{"title":"理想类型的因果解释维度:马克斯·韦伯对当代社会学的方法论贡献","authors":"Gert Albert","doi":"10.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p56","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article proposes a reading and updating of the ideal type of Max Weber from RolandGiere’s non-statement view. According to the latter, theories consist of theoretical models andhypotheses. From this, the ideal types of Weber do not consist of substantive propositions, butof theoretical idealizations that cannot be falsified, from which, however, hypotheses are derivedto be falsified or confirmed. The epistemological status of ideal Weber types does not consistof descriptive-causal propositions, but of definitions. In this way we achieve not only a newinterpretation of the weberian epistemological legacy, but also open the way for its interlocutionwith the current philosophy of science.","PeriodicalId":47847,"journal":{"name":"Politics & Society","volume":"19 1","pages":"56-82"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A dimensão causal-explicativa dos tipos ideais: a contribuição metodológica de Max Weber para a sociologia contemporânea\",\"authors\":\"Gert Albert\",\"doi\":\"10.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p56\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article proposes a reading and updating of the ideal type of Max Weber from RolandGiere’s non-statement view. According to the latter, theories consist of theoretical models andhypotheses. From this, the ideal types of Weber do not consist of substantive propositions, butof theoretical idealizations that cannot be falsified, from which, however, hypotheses are derivedto be falsified or confirmed. The epistemological status of ideal Weber types does not consistof descriptive-causal propositions, but of definitions. In this way we achieve not only a newinterpretation of the weberian epistemological legacy, but also open the way for its interlocutionwith the current philosophy of science.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politics & Society\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"56-82\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politics & Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p56\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politics & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5007/175-7984.2020v19n45p56","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
A dimensão causal-explicativa dos tipos ideais: a contribuição metodológica de Max Weber para a sociologia contemporânea
The article proposes a reading and updating of the ideal type of Max Weber from RolandGiere’s non-statement view. According to the latter, theories consist of theoretical models andhypotheses. From this, the ideal types of Weber do not consist of substantive propositions, butof theoretical idealizations that cannot be falsified, from which, however, hypotheses are derivedto be falsified or confirmed. The epistemological status of ideal Weber types does not consistof descriptive-causal propositions, but of definitions. In this way we achieve not only a newinterpretation of the weberian epistemological legacy, but also open the way for its interlocutionwith the current philosophy of science.
期刊介绍:
Politics & Society is a peer-reviewed journal. All submitted papers are read by a rotating editorial board member. If a paper is deemed potentially publishable, it is sent to another board member, who, if agreeing that it is potentially publishable, sends it to a third board member. If and only if all three agree, the paper is sent to the entire editorial board for consideration at board meetings. The editorial board meets three times a year, and the board members who are present (usually between 9 and 14) make decisions through a deliberative process that also considers written reports from absent members. Unlike many journals which rely on 1–3 individual blind referee reports and a single editor with final say, the peers who decide whether to accept submitted work are thus the full editorial board of the journal, comprised of scholars from various disciplines, who discuss papers openly, with author names known, at meetings. Editors are required to disclose potential conflicts of interest when evaluating manuscripts and to recuse themselves from voting if such a potential exists.