苗期施用高岭石颗粒对咖啡品种cenicaf 1幼苗的响应

Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jssas.2023.02.001
Carlos Andres Unigarro , Luis Carlos Imbachi Quinchua , Myriam Cañon Hernandez , José Ricardo Acuña Zornosa
{"title":"苗期施用高岭石颗粒对咖啡品种cenicaf<e:1> 1幼苗的响应","authors":"Carlos Andres Unigarro ,&nbsp;Luis Carlos Imbachi Quinchua ,&nbsp;Myriam Cañon Hernandez ,&nbsp;José Ricardo Acuña Zornosa","doi":"10.1016/j.jssas.2023.02.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The application of kaolinite has been shown to be a viable strategy for protecting crops against excessive solar radiation and high temperatures. In coffee, this could occur during the nursery stage when the seedlings grow directly in full sun. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of kaolinite particles when applied to coffee seedlings in full sun during the nursery stage and those of seedlings with no kaolinite applied grown directly in full sun and in shade. Two <em>Coffea arabica</em> L. variety Cenicafé 1 nurseries were established, and the following treatments were stablished: 1) K30: full sun with kaolinite at 30 g/L; 2) K60: full sun with kaolinite at 60 g/L; 3) SUN: full sun without kaolinite; and 4) SHADE: under a sunscreen with 60 % shade without kaolinite. The studied variables were dry mass, dry mass distribution, leaf characteristics, leaf physiological parameters, albedo, leaf temperature, and seedling mortality. Except for mortality, the variables were analyzed using a simple factorial design in generalized complete blocks and randomly using the Welch-James statistical test with bootstrapping. Mortality was assessed using a logistic binary response model with a X<sup>2</sup> test. The results showed that in comparison to the SHADE treatment, the SUN and K60 treatments resulted in more dry mass; in turn, the K60 treatment resulted in better RDM/TLA. In comparison to the SHADE treatment, both the K30 and K60 treatments resulted in greater increases in net photosynthesis rates, and in comparison, to the SUN treatment, these treatments also resulted in a greater increase in stomatal conductance, although only when the leaf abaxial temperature was greater than 30 °C. This result may have occurred based on the greater light reflection and the lower leaf temperatures obtained with kaolinite, in the K60 treatment. However, the seedlings that grew in full sun with and without kaolinite died three times more often than the seedlings in the shade. The previous suggests that it is not convenient to establish nurseries in full sun, with or without kaolinite, despite the physiological advantages and tolerance to high temperatures at the plant level.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":17560,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response to applying kaolinite particles in coffee variety Cenicafé 1 seedlings during the nursery stage\",\"authors\":\"Carlos Andres Unigarro ,&nbsp;Luis Carlos Imbachi Quinchua ,&nbsp;Myriam Cañon Hernandez ,&nbsp;José Ricardo Acuña Zornosa\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jssas.2023.02.001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The application of kaolinite has been shown to be a viable strategy for protecting crops against excessive solar radiation and high temperatures. In coffee, this could occur during the nursery stage when the seedlings grow directly in full sun. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of kaolinite particles when applied to coffee seedlings in full sun during the nursery stage and those of seedlings with no kaolinite applied grown directly in full sun and in shade. Two <em>Coffea arabica</em> L. variety Cenicafé 1 nurseries were established, and the following treatments were stablished: 1) K30: full sun with kaolinite at 30 g/L; 2) K60: full sun with kaolinite at 60 g/L; 3) SUN: full sun without kaolinite; and 4) SHADE: under a sunscreen with 60 % shade without kaolinite. The studied variables were dry mass, dry mass distribution, leaf characteristics, leaf physiological parameters, albedo, leaf temperature, and seedling mortality. Except for mortality, the variables were analyzed using a simple factorial design in generalized complete blocks and randomly using the Welch-James statistical test with bootstrapping. Mortality was assessed using a logistic binary response model with a X<sup>2</sup> test. The results showed that in comparison to the SHADE treatment, the SUN and K60 treatments resulted in more dry mass; in turn, the K60 treatment resulted in better RDM/TLA. In comparison to the SHADE treatment, both the K30 and K60 treatments resulted in greater increases in net photosynthesis rates, and in comparison, to the SUN treatment, these treatments also resulted in a greater increase in stomatal conductance, although only when the leaf abaxial temperature was greater than 30 °C. This result may have occurred based on the greater light reflection and the lower leaf temperatures obtained with kaolinite, in the K60 treatment. However, the seedlings that grew in full sun with and without kaolinite died three times more often than the seedlings in the shade. The previous suggests that it is not convenient to establish nurseries in full sun, with or without kaolinite, despite the physiological advantages and tolerance to high temperatures at the plant level.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17560,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658077X23000127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1658077X23000127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

应用高岭石已被证明是一种可行的策略,以保护作物免受过度的太阳辐射和高温。在咖啡中,这可能发生在苗圃阶段,当幼苗直接在充足的阳光下生长时。本研究的目的是评价高岭石颗粒在育苗阶段在充分阳光下施用时的效果,以及不施用高岭石的幼苗在充分阳光和阴凉处的生长效果。建立了2个小咖啡品种cenicaf 1苗圃,确定了以下处理:1)K30:高岭石浓度为30 g/L的全日照处理;2) K60:高岭石60g /L全日照;3)太阳:不含高岭石的全太阳;4)遮荫:使用不含高岭石的60%遮荫防晒霜。研究变量为干质量、干质量分布、叶片特性、叶片生理参数、反照率、叶片温度和幼苗死亡率。除死亡率外,所有变量均采用广义完全块的简单析因设计,随机采用Welch-James统计检验。死亡率评估采用logistic二元反应模型和X2检验。结果表明:与SHADE处理相比,SUN和K60处理的干质量更大;反过来,K60处理导致了更好的RDM/TLA。与SHADE处理相比,K30和K60处理的净光合速率增加幅度更大,与SUN处理相比,这些处理的气孔导度增加幅度也更大,尽管只有在叶背温度大于30℃时才会增加。这一结果可能是基于K60处理中高岭石获得的更大的光反射和更低的叶片温度。然而,在有高岭石和没有高岭石的充足阳光下生长的幼苗的死亡率是阴凉处幼苗的三倍。上述结果表明,尽管在植株水平上具有生理优势和耐高温能力,但无论有无高岭石,都不便于在阳光充足的条件下建立苗圃。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response to applying kaolinite particles in coffee variety Cenicafé 1 seedlings during the nursery stage

The application of kaolinite has been shown to be a viable strategy for protecting crops against excessive solar radiation and high temperatures. In coffee, this could occur during the nursery stage when the seedlings grow directly in full sun. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the effects of kaolinite particles when applied to coffee seedlings in full sun during the nursery stage and those of seedlings with no kaolinite applied grown directly in full sun and in shade. Two Coffea arabica L. variety Cenicafé 1 nurseries were established, and the following treatments were stablished: 1) K30: full sun with kaolinite at 30 g/L; 2) K60: full sun with kaolinite at 60 g/L; 3) SUN: full sun without kaolinite; and 4) SHADE: under a sunscreen with 60 % shade without kaolinite. The studied variables were dry mass, dry mass distribution, leaf characteristics, leaf physiological parameters, albedo, leaf temperature, and seedling mortality. Except for mortality, the variables were analyzed using a simple factorial design in generalized complete blocks and randomly using the Welch-James statistical test with bootstrapping. Mortality was assessed using a logistic binary response model with a X2 test. The results showed that in comparison to the SHADE treatment, the SUN and K60 treatments resulted in more dry mass; in turn, the K60 treatment resulted in better RDM/TLA. In comparison to the SHADE treatment, both the K30 and K60 treatments resulted in greater increases in net photosynthesis rates, and in comparison, to the SUN treatment, these treatments also resulted in a greater increase in stomatal conductance, although only when the leaf abaxial temperature was greater than 30 °C. This result may have occurred based on the greater light reflection and the lower leaf temperatures obtained with kaolinite, in the K60 treatment. However, the seedlings that grew in full sun with and without kaolinite died three times more often than the seedlings in the shade. The previous suggests that it is not convenient to establish nurseries in full sun, with or without kaolinite, despite the physiological advantages and tolerance to high temperatures at the plant level.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences
Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
17 days
期刊介绍: Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences is an English language, peer-review scholarly publication which publishes research articles and critical reviews from every area of Agricultural sciences and plant science. Scope of the journal includes, Agricultural Engineering, Plant production, Plant protection, Animal science, Agricultural extension, Agricultural economics, Food science and technology, Soil and water sciences, Irrigation science and technology and environmental science (soil formation, biological classification, mapping and management of soil). Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences publishes 4 issues per year and is the official publication of the King Saud University and Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences and is published by King Saud University in collaboration with Elsevier and is edited by an international group of eminent researchers.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Mapping nutrient and soil fertility indexes for Durum Wheat in the La Mina region of Algeria The effect of microplastic contaminated compost on the growth of rice seedlings Soil quality and land capability evaluation for agriculture in Balat area, El Dakhla Oasis, western Desert, Egypt Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1