教师数字监控工具对学生成绩影响的最佳证据荟萃分析

IF 2.8 3区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Effectiveness and School Improvement Pub Date : 2022-11-16 DOI:10.1080/09243453.2022.2142247
J. Faber, R. Feskens, A. Visscher
{"title":"教师数字监控工具对学生成绩影响的最佳证据荟萃分析","authors":"J. Faber, R. Feskens, A. Visscher","doi":"10.1080/09243453.2022.2142247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this study the effects of the use of digital student monitoring tools for teachers (DMTs) on student achievement (primary and secondary schools, mathematics, reading, and language) were investigated through a meta-analysis (n = 14). The studies were also coded for feedback and intervention features, which resulted in three groups of combinations of DMTs and interventions. The meta-analytic findings indicate that the use of a DMT overall has a moderate effect (ES = .12) on student achievement for studies in which student achievement is measured by means of researcher-independent tests. Positive effects were also found for the use of DMTs in primary education (ES = .14), reading (ES = .17), mathematics (ES = .10), and for two groups of DMT-intervention combinations (ES = .25 and .13). Our results are encouraging but should be interpreted with caution, given the small number of studies that met our stringent inclusion criteria.","PeriodicalId":47698,"journal":{"name":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A best-evidence meta-analysis of the effects of digital monitoring tools for teachers on student achievement\",\"authors\":\"J. Faber, R. Feskens, A. Visscher\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09243453.2022.2142247\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this study the effects of the use of digital student monitoring tools for teachers (DMTs) on student achievement (primary and secondary schools, mathematics, reading, and language) were investigated through a meta-analysis (n = 14). The studies were also coded for feedback and intervention features, which resulted in three groups of combinations of DMTs and interventions. The meta-analytic findings indicate that the use of a DMT overall has a moderate effect (ES = .12) on student achievement for studies in which student achievement is measured by means of researcher-independent tests. Positive effects were also found for the use of DMTs in primary education (ES = .14), reading (ES = .17), mathematics (ES = .10), and for two groups of DMT-intervention combinations (ES = .25 and .13). Our results are encouraging but should be interpreted with caution, given the small number of studies that met our stringent inclusion criteria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"School Effectiveness and School Improvement\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"School Effectiveness and School Improvement\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2142247\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Effectiveness and School Improvement","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2022.2142247","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本研究中,通过荟萃分析(n = 14)调查了教师使用数字学生监控工具(dmt)对学生成绩(小学和中学、数学、阅读和语言)的影响。这些研究也对反馈和干预特征进行了编码,这导致了三组dmt和干预的组合。荟萃分析结果表明,DMT的使用总体上对学生成绩有中等影响(ES = .12),其中学生成绩是通过研究者独立的测试来衡量的。在小学教育(ES = 0.14)、阅读(ES = 0.17)、数学(ES = 0.10)和两组dmt干预组合(ES = 0.17)中也发现了dmt的积极影响。25和0.13)。我们的结果令人鼓舞,但考虑到符合我们严格的纳入标准的研究数量较少,应谨慎解读。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A best-evidence meta-analysis of the effects of digital monitoring tools for teachers on student achievement
ABSTRACT In this study the effects of the use of digital student monitoring tools for teachers (DMTs) on student achievement (primary and secondary schools, mathematics, reading, and language) were investigated through a meta-analysis (n = 14). The studies were also coded for feedback and intervention features, which resulted in three groups of combinations of DMTs and interventions. The meta-analytic findings indicate that the use of a DMT overall has a moderate effect (ES = .12) on student achievement for studies in which student achievement is measured by means of researcher-independent tests. Positive effects were also found for the use of DMTs in primary education (ES = .14), reading (ES = .17), mathematics (ES = .10), and for two groups of DMT-intervention combinations (ES = .25 and .13). Our results are encouraging but should be interpreted with caution, given the small number of studies that met our stringent inclusion criteria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
School Effectiveness and School Improvement
School Effectiveness and School Improvement EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: School Effectiveness and School Improvement presents information on educational effectiveness, practice and policy-making across primary, secondary and higher education. The Editors believe that the educational progress of all students, regardless of family background and economic status, is the key indicator of effectiveness and improvement in schools. The journal strives to explore this idea with manuscripts that cover a range of subjects within the area of educational effectiveness at the classroom, school or system level, including, but not limited to: •Effective pedagogy •Classroom climate •School ethos and leadership •School improvement and reform programmes •Systemwide policy and reform
期刊最新文献
Advancing the field of educational effectiveness and equity School leadership and students’ decisions about further education: exploring the roles of goal setting and school socioeconomic composition Against the odds: predictors of academic success and excellence in majority-minority schools Effects of the comprehensive school reform program Success for All on students’ reading skills in Dutch schools High-quality teachers in low-quality schools: understanding the variation in teaching quality in low-achieving Chilean schools
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1