通过参与学术写作回应博士生需求的写作务虚

IF 0.9 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Qualitative Research in Education Pub Date : 2022-02-28 DOI:10.17583/qre.9195
Émilie Tremblay-Wragg, C. Vincent, S. Mathieu-C., Christelle Lison, Annabelle Ponsin, Catherine E. Déri
{"title":"通过参与学术写作回应博士生需求的写作务虚","authors":"Émilie Tremblay-Wragg, C. Vincent, S. Mathieu-C., Christelle Lison, Annabelle Ponsin, Catherine E. Déri","doi":"10.17583/qre.9195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During dissertation writing, PhD candidates face challenges engaging with academic writing, among other things, which leads to their participation in writing retreats with their peers. Developing a better understanding of PhD candidates’ needs to optimize engagement with writing is important for improving the overall doctoral experience and reduce attrition. We then conducted a qualitative longitudinal experimental study with PhD candidates from Canadian universities: 15 respondents who participated in a writing retreat and 15 respondents who never participated in such event. Based on our findings, this article presents a complementary perspective to the theoretical model of engagement with writing by Murray (2015). Thereon, we expand on the intersectionality of components (cognitive, physical, social) to illustrate the influence of structured writing activities. These intersections highlight the benefits of writing retreats to answer the needs of PhD candidates to engage with writing: planning dedicated writing periods, implementing effective work methods in environments enabling concentration, and engaging with collective writing activities. By way of supplementing the most recent literature on the subject, we suggest that the participation in structured writing retreats serves as a pedagogical benchmark for graduate programs to offer students comparable conditions in support of their writing requirements to enhance academic success.","PeriodicalId":42606,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative Research in Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Writing Retreats Responding to the Needs of Doctoral Candidates Through Engagement with Academic Writing\",\"authors\":\"Émilie Tremblay-Wragg, C. Vincent, S. Mathieu-C., Christelle Lison, Annabelle Ponsin, Catherine E. Déri\",\"doi\":\"10.17583/qre.9195\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During dissertation writing, PhD candidates face challenges engaging with academic writing, among other things, which leads to their participation in writing retreats with their peers. Developing a better understanding of PhD candidates’ needs to optimize engagement with writing is important for improving the overall doctoral experience and reduce attrition. We then conducted a qualitative longitudinal experimental study with PhD candidates from Canadian universities: 15 respondents who participated in a writing retreat and 15 respondents who never participated in such event. Based on our findings, this article presents a complementary perspective to the theoretical model of engagement with writing by Murray (2015). Thereon, we expand on the intersectionality of components (cognitive, physical, social) to illustrate the influence of structured writing activities. These intersections highlight the benefits of writing retreats to answer the needs of PhD candidates to engage with writing: planning dedicated writing periods, implementing effective work methods in environments enabling concentration, and engaging with collective writing activities. By way of supplementing the most recent literature on the subject, we suggest that the participation in structured writing retreats serves as a pedagogical benchmark for graduate programs to offer students comparable conditions in support of their writing requirements to enhance academic success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative Research in Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative Research in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.9195\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative Research in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17583/qre.9195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在论文写作过程中,博士生在参与学术写作等方面面临挑战,这导致他们与同龄人一起参加写作务虚会。更好地了解博士生的需求,优化写作参与度,对于提高博士生的整体经验和减少流失非常重要。然后,我们对加拿大大学的博士生进行了一项定性纵向实验研究:15名受访者参加了写作务虚会,15名受访者从未参加过此类活动。基于我们的研究结果,本文对Murray(2015)的写作参与理论模型提出了一个补充视角。因此,我们扩展了组成部分(认知、身体、社会)的交叉性,以说明结构化写作活动的影响。这些交叉点突出了写作务虚会的好处,以满足博士生参与写作的需求:计划专门的写作时间,在能够集中注意力的环境中实施有效的工作方法,以及参与集体写作活动。作为对该主题最新文献的补充,我们建议,参加结构化写作务虚会可以作为研究生项目的教学基准,为学生提供可比的条件,以支持他们的写作要求,从而提高学术成就。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Writing Retreats Responding to the Needs of Doctoral Candidates Through Engagement with Academic Writing
During dissertation writing, PhD candidates face challenges engaging with academic writing, among other things, which leads to their participation in writing retreats with their peers. Developing a better understanding of PhD candidates’ needs to optimize engagement with writing is important for improving the overall doctoral experience and reduce attrition. We then conducted a qualitative longitudinal experimental study with PhD candidates from Canadian universities: 15 respondents who participated in a writing retreat and 15 respondents who never participated in such event. Based on our findings, this article presents a complementary perspective to the theoretical model of engagement with writing by Murray (2015). Thereon, we expand on the intersectionality of components (cognitive, physical, social) to illustrate the influence of structured writing activities. These intersections highlight the benefits of writing retreats to answer the needs of PhD candidates to engage with writing: planning dedicated writing periods, implementing effective work methods in environments enabling concentration, and engaging with collective writing activities. By way of supplementing the most recent literature on the subject, we suggest that the participation in structured writing retreats serves as a pedagogical benchmark for graduate programs to offer students comparable conditions in support of their writing requirements to enhance academic success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Qualitative Research in Education
Qualitative Research in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
4
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Role of Social Networks to Counteract Stigmatization Toward Gay and Bisexual Men Regarding Monkeypox Experiencias de Jóvenes en Contextos de Vulnerabilidad Social durante la COVID-19: Narrativas Combinadas con Foto-Elicitación Democratizing Taste on Classical Music for All Necesidades y propuestas para la intervención con menores y violencia de género desde la educación The Mediation of Music in the Development of Intrapersonal and Action Skills in Early Teacher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1