{"title":"欧盟能源法的地方性","authors":"Simon Vanhove","doi":"10.54648/eelr2020046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article identifies ‘locality’ as an overarching concept in EU energy law. This has two consequences. First, it highlights the need for coherent law-making on EU level, specifically by avoiding multiplication of similar-but-not-identical concepts. Second, I argue locality can be considered a specific expression of subsidiarity. To support these claims, this article takes Belgium as a case study for diverse interpretations of this locality concept in Member State law. This is done by an analysis of both regional legislation and the regulator’s decision practice. Furthermore, I revisit theory on the EU constitutional principle of subsidiarity. Finally, a counter-example is offered: the second generation of network codes and guidelines will increasingly impact ‘local’ aspects of the electricity markets. In conclusion, locality serves a double theoretical role: it offers a descriptive classification for EU energy law and provides a substantive hermeneutic tool for subsidiarity assessments.\nEU energy law, Clean Energy Package, subsidiarity, locality, proximity, single market, integration, harmonization, network codes and guidelines","PeriodicalId":53610,"journal":{"name":"European Energy and Environmental Law Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Locality in EU Energy Law\",\"authors\":\"Simon Vanhove\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/eelr2020046\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article identifies ‘locality’ as an overarching concept in EU energy law. This has two consequences. First, it highlights the need for coherent law-making on EU level, specifically by avoiding multiplication of similar-but-not-identical concepts. Second, I argue locality can be considered a specific expression of subsidiarity. To support these claims, this article takes Belgium as a case study for diverse interpretations of this locality concept in Member State law. This is done by an analysis of both regional legislation and the regulator’s decision practice. Furthermore, I revisit theory on the EU constitutional principle of subsidiarity. Finally, a counter-example is offered: the second generation of network codes and guidelines will increasingly impact ‘local’ aspects of the electricity markets. In conclusion, locality serves a double theoretical role: it offers a descriptive classification for EU energy law and provides a substantive hermeneutic tool for subsidiarity assessments.\\nEU energy law, Clean Energy Package, subsidiarity, locality, proximity, single market, integration, harmonization, network codes and guidelines\",\"PeriodicalId\":53610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Energy and Environmental Law Review\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Energy and Environmental Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/eelr2020046\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Energy and Environmental Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eelr2020046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article identifies ‘locality’ as an overarching concept in EU energy law. This has two consequences. First, it highlights the need for coherent law-making on EU level, specifically by avoiding multiplication of similar-but-not-identical concepts. Second, I argue locality can be considered a specific expression of subsidiarity. To support these claims, this article takes Belgium as a case study for diverse interpretations of this locality concept in Member State law. This is done by an analysis of both regional legislation and the regulator’s decision practice. Furthermore, I revisit theory on the EU constitutional principle of subsidiarity. Finally, a counter-example is offered: the second generation of network codes and guidelines will increasingly impact ‘local’ aspects of the electricity markets. In conclusion, locality serves a double theoretical role: it offers a descriptive classification for EU energy law and provides a substantive hermeneutic tool for subsidiarity assessments.
EU energy law, Clean Energy Package, subsidiarity, locality, proximity, single market, integration, harmonization, network codes and guidelines