自由市场短视的危害

Q4 Business, Management and Accounting Restaurant Business Pub Date : 2019-10-11 DOI:10.26643/rb.v118i10.9573
Yogesh Hole, S. Hole, M. Bhaskar
{"title":"自由市场短视的危害","authors":"Yogesh Hole, S. Hole, M. Bhaskar","doi":"10.26643/rb.v118i10.9573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the academy and business of knowledge creation and diffusion, the marketing academics fell into Levitt (1960) trap described as Marketing Myopia, which means the company focuses more on their products instead of understanding the customer needs. This review paper’s purpose is to evaluate the marketing academic practices to recognize what precisely they preach. Does Marketing Myopia orient really create confusion and collapse of industries as the main business field of knowledge generation and dissemination? In the methodology, design, and approach, the paper evaluates critically the epistemology of marketing myopia literature emphasizes the performance of marketing knowledge in the production and industry field. Hence, the paper finds whether the knowledge of marketing science can be regarded as valid. Unfortunately, Marketing academicians have turned myopic to understand what marketing knowledge is all about, as they feel it has become a production-oriented, having the objective to produce the optimum. Certainly, there is an urgent need to drive action research, using practitioner tools underlining marketing facts. Hence, this paper tries to investigate the theory of marketing with critically observing its validity, scope, and methods and highlights every aspect of marketing academic literature. \nIt is concluded that industries and companies hold a myopic view and attitude concerning their business, mainly because of the fact that they assume many things, ignorant of the market changing trends and hence oblivious of future tendencies of their own resources. Therefore, they should alter their attitude to bring strategic changes to improve business for success.","PeriodicalId":35351,"journal":{"name":"Restaurant Business","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Damages of Liberal Marketing Myopia\",\"authors\":\"Yogesh Hole, S. Hole, M. Bhaskar\",\"doi\":\"10.26643/rb.v118i10.9573\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the academy and business of knowledge creation and diffusion, the marketing academics fell into Levitt (1960) trap described as Marketing Myopia, which means the company focuses more on their products instead of understanding the customer needs. This review paper’s purpose is to evaluate the marketing academic practices to recognize what precisely they preach. Does Marketing Myopia orient really create confusion and collapse of industries as the main business field of knowledge generation and dissemination? In the methodology, design, and approach, the paper evaluates critically the epistemology of marketing myopia literature emphasizes the performance of marketing knowledge in the production and industry field. Hence, the paper finds whether the knowledge of marketing science can be regarded as valid. Unfortunately, Marketing academicians have turned myopic to understand what marketing knowledge is all about, as they feel it has become a production-oriented, having the objective to produce the optimum. Certainly, there is an urgent need to drive action research, using practitioner tools underlining marketing facts. Hence, this paper tries to investigate the theory of marketing with critically observing its validity, scope, and methods and highlights every aspect of marketing academic literature. \\nIt is concluded that industries and companies hold a myopic view and attitude concerning their business, mainly because of the fact that they assume many things, ignorant of the market changing trends and hence oblivious of future tendencies of their own resources. Therefore, they should alter their attitude to bring strategic changes to improve business for success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35351,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Restaurant Business\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Restaurant Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26643/rb.v118i10.9573\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Business, Management and Accounting\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Restaurant Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26643/rb.v118i10.9573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

在知识创造和传播的学术和商业领域,营销学者陷入了Levitt(1960)的陷阱,被称为营销近视,这意味着公司更多地关注他们的产品,而不是了解客户的需求。这篇综述文章的目的是评估营销学术实践,以准确地认识到它们所宣扬的内容。作为知识生成和传播的主要业务领域,营销近视真的会造成行业的混乱和崩溃吗?在方法论、设计和方法上,本文对营销近视文学的认识论进行了批判性评价,强调营销知识在生产和工业领域的表现。因此,本文确定了营销科学知识是否可以被视为有效。不幸的是,营销学者们已经变得目光短浅,无法理解营销知识的全部内容,因为他们觉得营销知识已经成为一种以生产为导向的知识,其目标是生产出最佳产品。当然,迫切需要推动行动研究,使用强调营销事实的从业者工具。因此,本文试图通过批判性地观察市场营销理论的有效性、范围和方法来研究市场营销理论,并突出市场营销学术文献的各个方面。结论是,行业和公司对自己的业务持有短视的看法和态度,主要是因为他们承担了很多事情,对市场变化趋势一无所知,因此对自己资源的未来趋势视而不见。因此,他们应该改变态度,带来战略变革,以提高业务的成功率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Damages of Liberal Marketing Myopia
In the academy and business of knowledge creation and diffusion, the marketing academics fell into Levitt (1960) trap described as Marketing Myopia, which means the company focuses more on their products instead of understanding the customer needs. This review paper’s purpose is to evaluate the marketing academic practices to recognize what precisely they preach. Does Marketing Myopia orient really create confusion and collapse of industries as the main business field of knowledge generation and dissemination? In the methodology, design, and approach, the paper evaluates critically the epistemology of marketing myopia literature emphasizes the performance of marketing knowledge in the production and industry field. Hence, the paper finds whether the knowledge of marketing science can be regarded as valid. Unfortunately, Marketing academicians have turned myopic to understand what marketing knowledge is all about, as they feel it has become a production-oriented, having the objective to produce the optimum. Certainly, there is an urgent need to drive action research, using practitioner tools underlining marketing facts. Hence, this paper tries to investigate the theory of marketing with critically observing its validity, scope, and methods and highlights every aspect of marketing academic literature. It is concluded that industries and companies hold a myopic view and attitude concerning their business, mainly because of the fact that they assume many things, ignorant of the market changing trends and hence oblivious of future tendencies of their own resources. Therefore, they should alter their attitude to bring strategic changes to improve business for success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Restaurant Business
Restaurant Business Business, Management and Accounting-Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Restaurant Business is the leading media brand in the commercial foodservice industry, with a focus on entrepreneurship, innovation and growth. Restaurant Business understands the new state of media like no other, recognizing the importance and nuances of each, and helping you retrieve the information you need, wherever, whenever. Each product of Restaurant Business concisely shows growth-minded restaurateurs how to capitalize on trends, new concepts, changes in consumer tastes, new purchasing strategies and peers’ best practices. Our editors track ideas and trends as they develop within key channel segments including high-volume independents, multiunit operators, emerging chains and the top 100 chains, plus their top franchisees.
期刊最新文献
A Strategic Review on Economic Dispatch Distribution and Environmental Considerations Organizational Agility and HRM Practices: Theoretical Framework and Perspective A Study On Consumer Awareness And Influence Towards Jaisuryas Departmental Stores In Salem City A Study On Stress Management Among Doctors And Nurses Working In Government Hospitals In Salem And Dharmapuri District Holistic Performance Assessment of Indian Private sector Banks: An Empirical Study with Multiple Model Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1