用CIPP量表评估可选英语预备课程

IF 0.4 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.14812/cuefd.1142778
Fatma Betül Temi̇z, Ahmet Başal
{"title":"用CIPP量表评估可选英语预备课程","authors":"Fatma Betül Temi̇z, Ahmet Başal","doi":"10.14812/cuefd.1142778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The quality of English language education in universities is vital in preparing individuals for the increasingly globalized world. Assessing the efficacy of English teaching programs is therefore crucial to ensuring such quality. Consequently, this study aims to evaluate the optional English preparatory program of a state university using the CIPP model dimensions: context, input, process, and product. The current study employs a mixed-methods research approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data to address the research questions. The study sample comprised 247 preparatory graduate and 77 preparatory students, as well as 6 lecturers. In the quantitative part, The CIPP scale (Context, Input, Process, and Product), developed by the researchers based on item analysis, second-order exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis, criterion validity, and content validity, was used to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the English preparatory program based on responses of participants to the items in four dimensions of the scale. The qualitative aspect of the study involved obtaining responses from participant students through open-ended questions and conducting semi-structured interviews with lecturers. These responses were analyzed, and the resulting excerpts were used to support and complement the findings obtained from the quantitative findings. The results indicate that the participants were highly satisfied with the optional nature of the program and held positive perceptions of it. However, some improvements, particularly in the physical conditions of the program's context dimension, such as the library, laboratory, and school building, were required. The findings from the input and process dimensions reveal the importance of increasing target language use and prioritization of speaking skills in the product dimension. The developed CIPP scale, which is statistically reliable and valid, can be utilized by researchers to evaluate English preparatory programs using the CIPP model. The study concludes by offering several key recommendations for creating a more effective English preparatory program based on the findings.","PeriodicalId":41750,"journal":{"name":"Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of an Optional English Preparatory Program with CIPP Scale\",\"authors\":\"Fatma Betül Temi̇z, Ahmet Başal\",\"doi\":\"10.14812/cuefd.1142778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The quality of English language education in universities is vital in preparing individuals for the increasingly globalized world. Assessing the efficacy of English teaching programs is therefore crucial to ensuring such quality. Consequently, this study aims to evaluate the optional English preparatory program of a state university using the CIPP model dimensions: context, input, process, and product. The current study employs a mixed-methods research approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data to address the research questions. The study sample comprised 247 preparatory graduate and 77 preparatory students, as well as 6 lecturers. In the quantitative part, The CIPP scale (Context, Input, Process, and Product), developed by the researchers based on item analysis, second-order exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis, criterion validity, and content validity, was used to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the English preparatory program based on responses of participants to the items in four dimensions of the scale. The qualitative aspect of the study involved obtaining responses from participant students through open-ended questions and conducting semi-structured interviews with lecturers. These responses were analyzed, and the resulting excerpts were used to support and complement the findings obtained from the quantitative findings. The results indicate that the participants were highly satisfied with the optional nature of the program and held positive perceptions of it. However, some improvements, particularly in the physical conditions of the program's context dimension, such as the library, laboratory, and school building, were required. The findings from the input and process dimensions reveal the importance of increasing target language use and prioritization of speaking skills in the product dimension. The developed CIPP scale, which is statistically reliable and valid, can be utilized by researchers to evaluate English preparatory programs using the CIPP model. The study concludes by offering several key recommendations for creating a more effective English preparatory program based on the findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41750,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.1142778\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.1142778","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

大学英语教育的质量对于个人为日益全球化的世界做好准备至关重要。因此,评估英语教学计划的有效性对于确保这种质量至关重要。因此,本研究旨在使用CIPP模型维度:语境、输入、过程和产品来评估一所州立大学的可选英语预备课程。本研究采用混合方法研究方法,结合定量和定性数据来解决研究问题。研究样本包括247名预备研究生和77名预备生,以及6名讲师。在定量部分,CIPP量表(上下文、输入、过程和产品),由研究人员基于项目分析、二阶探索性因素分析、可靠性分析、标准有效性和内容有效性开发,用于根据参与者对量表四个维度项目的反应来确定英语预备课程的优势和劣势。该研究的定性方面包括通过开放式问题获得参与者学生的回答,并对讲师进行半结构化访谈。对这些反应进行了分析,所得摘录用于支持和补充定量研究结果。结果表明,参与者对该项目的可选性质非常满意,并对其持有积极的看法。然而,还需要一些改进,特别是在项目背景维度的物理条件方面,如图书馆、实验室和学校建筑。来自输入和过程维度的研究结果揭示了在产品维度中增加目标语言使用和优先考虑口语技能的重要性。开发的CIPP量表在统计上是可靠和有效的,研究人员可以利用CIPP模型来评估英语预备课程。该研究最后提出了几个关键建议,以期根据研究结果创建一个更有效的英语预备课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Evaluation of an Optional English Preparatory Program with CIPP Scale
The quality of English language education in universities is vital in preparing individuals for the increasingly globalized world. Assessing the efficacy of English teaching programs is therefore crucial to ensuring such quality. Consequently, this study aims to evaluate the optional English preparatory program of a state university using the CIPP model dimensions: context, input, process, and product. The current study employs a mixed-methods research approach, combining quantitative and qualitative data to address the research questions. The study sample comprised 247 preparatory graduate and 77 preparatory students, as well as 6 lecturers. In the quantitative part, The CIPP scale (Context, Input, Process, and Product), developed by the researchers based on item analysis, second-order exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis, criterion validity, and content validity, was used to determine the strengths and weaknesses of the English preparatory program based on responses of participants to the items in four dimensions of the scale. The qualitative aspect of the study involved obtaining responses from participant students through open-ended questions and conducting semi-structured interviews with lecturers. These responses were analyzed, and the resulting excerpts were used to support and complement the findings obtained from the quantitative findings. The results indicate that the participants were highly satisfied with the optional nature of the program and held positive perceptions of it. However, some improvements, particularly in the physical conditions of the program's context dimension, such as the library, laboratory, and school building, were required. The findings from the input and process dimensions reveal the importance of increasing target language use and prioritization of speaking skills in the product dimension. The developed CIPP scale, which is statistically reliable and valid, can be utilized by researchers to evaluate English preparatory programs using the CIPP model. The study concludes by offering several key recommendations for creating a more effective English preparatory program based on the findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal
Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Müzikal Yetenek İnançlarına İlişkin Bir Ölçek Uyarlama Çalışması Türkiye’de İngilizceyi Yabancı Dil Olarak Öğrenenlerin Yabancı Dil Benlik Sistemlerinin Kesitsel Desenle İncelenmesi Mesleğe Yeni Başlayan Türkçe Öğretmenlerinin Karşılaştığı Sorunlar: Öğretmen Eğitimi Programı Temelinde Bir İncelenme Umut, Öz-Yeterlik ve Benlik Saygısının Ergenlerin Kariyer Kaygıları Üzerindeki Yordayıcı Rolü Kriz Danışmanlığı Dersinin Psikolojik Danışma Öz-yeterliği ve Krize Müdahaleye Hazırlık Düzeyine Etkisi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1