计量领域专家能力评价结果的广义比较

O. Velychko, T. Gordienko
{"title":"计量领域专家能力评价结果的广义比较","authors":"O. Velychko, T. Gordienko","doi":"10.33955/2307-2180(4)2018.61-66","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the results of research of known methods and methods for assessing the competence of experts in the field of metrology according to established criteria. The results are processed using special techniques and software tools, taking into account the uncertainty of the data and the application of the analytical hierarchy method. A comparative analysis of the results is carried out to assess the convergence and suitability of the methods.","PeriodicalId":52864,"journal":{"name":"Metrologiia ta priladi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Generalized Comparison of the Results of Evaluation of Experts Competence in the Field of Metrology\",\"authors\":\"O. Velychko, T. Gordienko\",\"doi\":\"10.33955/2307-2180(4)2018.61-66\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article presents the results of research of known methods and methods for assessing the competence of experts in the field of metrology according to established criteria. The results are processed using special techniques and software tools, taking into account the uncertainty of the data and the application of the analytical hierarchy method. A comparative analysis of the results is carried out to assess the convergence and suitability of the methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metrologiia ta priladi\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metrologiia ta priladi\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.33955/2307-2180(4)2018.61-66\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metrologiia ta priladi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33955/2307-2180(4)2018.61-66","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了已知方法的研究结果,以及根据既定标准评估计量领域专家能力的方法。考虑到数据的不确定性和层次分析法的应用,使用特殊的技术和软件工具对结果进行处理。并对结果进行了对比分析,以评价方法的收敛性和适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Generalized Comparison of the Results of Evaluation of Experts Competence in the Field of Metrology
The article presents the results of research of known methods and methods for assessing the competence of experts in the field of metrology according to established criteria. The results are processed using special techniques and software tools, taking into account the uncertainty of the data and the application of the analytical hierarchy method. A comparative analysis of the results is carried out to assess the convergence and suitability of the methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊最新文献
State Primary Standard of Gas Volume and Flow Rate Units for the Pressure Range of 1 MPa to 5 MPa (PVTt-15) THE ARTICLE IS ELLIMINATED Evaluation of the Signal Power Spectrum in Directional Receiving Systems Non-Selective Magnetoelectric Thermal Radiation Receiver Based on Cadmium Antimonide Features, Opportunities and Application of Control Cards Accumulated Sum. Part 2. Numerical Method for Assessing the Disorder of a Technological Process
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1