残疾学生约束和隔离的国家趋势和学校水平预测因素

IF 0.6 4区 教育学 Q4 EDUCATION, SPECIAL Exceptionality Pub Date : 2020-02-25 DOI:10.1080/09362835.2020.1727327
Nicholas A. Gage, Danielle L. Pico, Lauren L. Evanovich
{"title":"残疾学生约束和隔离的国家趋势和学校水平预测因素","authors":"Nicholas A. Gage, Danielle L. Pico, Lauren L. Evanovich","doi":"10.1080/09362835.2020.1727327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The use of restraint and seclusion in schools puts students at risk of injury or, in extreme cases, even death. As a result, advocacy organizations and the U.S. Department of Education have developed and proliferated policy and legislative recommendations to reduce such use. Nevertheless, incidents of restraint and seclusion continue to occur, and more frequently with students with disabilities. In this study, we leveraged the most recent U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights Data to examined the prevalence of restraint and seclusion use for students with and without disabilities and school-level predictors of increased restraint and seclusion incidents. We found that students with disabilities are seven times more likely to be restrained and four times more likely to be secluded. We also found that students in special education schools are almost guaranteed to receive a restraint or seclusion. The results are then contextualized using prior research and policy recommendations.","PeriodicalId":46668,"journal":{"name":"Exceptionality","volume":"30 1","pages":"1 - 13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2020.1727327","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"National Trends and School-Level Predictors of Restraint and Seclusion for Students with Disabilities\",\"authors\":\"Nicholas A. Gage, Danielle L. Pico, Lauren L. Evanovich\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09362835.2020.1727327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The use of restraint and seclusion in schools puts students at risk of injury or, in extreme cases, even death. As a result, advocacy organizations and the U.S. Department of Education have developed and proliferated policy and legislative recommendations to reduce such use. Nevertheless, incidents of restraint and seclusion continue to occur, and more frequently with students with disabilities. In this study, we leveraged the most recent U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights Data to examined the prevalence of restraint and seclusion use for students with and without disabilities and school-level predictors of increased restraint and seclusion incidents. We found that students with disabilities are seven times more likely to be restrained and four times more likely to be secluded. We also found that students in special education schools are almost guaranteed to receive a restraint or seclusion. The results are then contextualized using prior research and policy recommendations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46668,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Exceptionality\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-02-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/09362835.2020.1727327\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Exceptionality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1727327\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exceptionality","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09362835.2020.1727327","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

摘要在学校里使用约束和隔离会使学生面临受伤的风险,在极端情况下甚至死亡。因此,倡导组织和美国教育部制定并推广了减少此类使用的政策和立法建议。尽管如此,约束和隔离事件仍在发生,残疾学生的情况更为频繁。在这项研究中,我们利用美国教育部民权数据办公室的最新数据,研究了残疾和非残疾学生使用约束和隔离的普遍性,以及学校层面约束和隔离事件增加的预测因素。我们发现,残疾学生受到约束的可能性是其他学生的七倍,与世隔绝的可能性是他们的四倍。我们还发现,特殊教育学校的学生几乎可以保证受到约束或隔离。然后,使用先前的研究和政策建议,将结果置于背景中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
National Trends and School-Level Predictors of Restraint and Seclusion for Students with Disabilities
ABSTRACT The use of restraint and seclusion in schools puts students at risk of injury or, in extreme cases, even death. As a result, advocacy organizations and the U.S. Department of Education have developed and proliferated policy and legislative recommendations to reduce such use. Nevertheless, incidents of restraint and seclusion continue to occur, and more frequently with students with disabilities. In this study, we leveraged the most recent U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Civil Rights Data to examined the prevalence of restraint and seclusion use for students with and without disabilities and school-level predictors of increased restraint and seclusion incidents. We found that students with disabilities are seven times more likely to be restrained and four times more likely to be secluded. We also found that students in special education schools are almost guaranteed to receive a restraint or seclusion. The results are then contextualized using prior research and policy recommendations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Exceptionality
Exceptionality EDUCATION, SPECIAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
Experiences of Teachers of Students with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities During the COVID-19 Pandemic The Effectiveness of Teaching High-Risk Cooking Skills with Video Models to Individuals with Intellectual Disability Legal Analysis of the Interpretation of Adapted Physical Education in US Law Examining Similarities and Differences in Parent Advocacy During Early Intervention and School Services What Does a Useful Practitioner Journal Article Look Like? Perceptions of Preservice Teacher Candidates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1